| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
la3346

Joined: 30 May 2006 Posts: 2775
|
Posted: Mon Jul 10, 2006 8:53 pm Post subject: Bynum's athleticism deceptive? |
|
|
Check out this dunk by Tyrus Thomas:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ldgQbvC_tfg&search=tyrus%20thomas
Pretty impressive right? But then compare that with this
and you'll see that Bynum's hands are actually a bit higher than Thomas'(pause Thomas' dunk, at no point, his hands are higher than Bynum's.)
Here's the video of Bynum's dunk:
http://rapidshare.de/files/25417031/SPL-070906-1stHalf.mpg.html
You can tell that Thomas were running at full steam while Bynum is standing still.
Now Tyrus Thomas has a standing reach of 9'0 and a max vertical of 39", and a max jumping reach of 12'3(you can get this just by adding those two together). According to Mitch, Bynum can reach 9 inches above the top of the backboard inner square, which is 22 inches high(it's actually 18 inches, but the lines add 2 inches each), which would make his max reach 12'7.
Now Bynum is rumored to have a 33" standing vertical and a 37" max vertical, add them together and it would come out 12'3 for standing vertical and 12'7 for max reach. Well, 12'3 is Thomas running(max) reach, and we can see in the video that Thomas's running jump(max) reach is equal to Bynum's standing vertical reach, so clearly he's not lying.
What's even more impressive is that Howard has a max reach of 12'6, so Bynum can actually reach 1" higher than Howard.
However, if you look at the video of Bynum's dunk, Bynum sure didn't "look" explosive. What I'd like to see is someone to throw Bynum a lob pass while he gets a full head of steam, perhaps then we'll see his explosiveness. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
trodgers Clublakers Moderator

Joined: 22 Oct 2004 Posts: 22095 Location: Tallahassee
|
Posted: Mon Jul 10, 2006 9:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting stuff. When I first heard about Bynum's vertical, I was blown away. A guy that big with that kind of leaping ability on top of his mass is ridiculous. _________________
PM me to join!
Or play some football:
http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=324001 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
10scott10

Joined: 03 May 2006 Posts: 4748 Location: looking for the royal room entrance
|
Posted: Mon Jul 10, 2006 10:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| k0pr0phage wrote: |
| Interesting stuff. When I first heard about Bynum's vertical, I was blown away. A guy that big with that kind of leaping ability on top of his mass is ridiculous. |
what is his vert? _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
killacam

Joined: 29 Oct 2005 Posts: 617
|
Posted: Mon Jul 10, 2006 10:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| /\says rite there, 33" standing, 37" max |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
the sauce

Joined: 27 Jun 2005 Posts: 751 Location: Bay Area
|
Posted: Mon Jul 10, 2006 11:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Fascinating. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MoneyMike
Joined: 15 Feb 2005 Posts: 435 Location: Alaska
|
Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 2:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
pretty sick for a big man  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MasterRaider
Joined: 14 Jul 2004 Posts: 3084
|
Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 3:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| What was Shaq's coming out of college? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dagreatkobe

Joined: 27 Aug 2005 Posts: 1458 Location: Los Angeles
|
Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 5:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| im sorry but i think tyrus can get up higher than that... bynum has great athleticsm, but tyrus is explosive... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
abeer3
Joined: 18 Feb 2005 Posts: 4469
|
Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 6:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
| dagreatkobe wrote: |
| im sorry but i think tyrus can get up higher than that... bynum has great athleticsm, but tyrus is explosive... |
so, you choose to ignore the evidence?
not that bynum strikes me as a great athlete, but if those numbers are from the pre-draft camps, they're pretty reliable. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
la3346

Joined: 30 May 2006 Posts: 2775
|
Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 8:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
| dagreatkobe wrote: |
| im sorry but i think tyrus can get up higher than that... bynum has great athleticsm, but tyrus is explosive... |
I think the difference is Thomas is running and "hangs" in the air longer, giving the appearance of explosiveness. Think about it, Thomas relies on his vertical to get the same reach, so he's able to stay airborne longer than Bynum, both on his way up and down. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Stearnfxr
Joined: 19 Jun 2006 Posts: 435
|
Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 11:02 am Post subject: Re: Bynum's athleticism deceptive? |
|
|
| I wish you wouldn't use that crap rapid share, can't you use Utube? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kb the assassin

Joined: 04 Apr 2006 Posts: 887 Location: Cali4nia
|
Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 11:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
| MoneyMike wrote: |
pretty sick for a big man  |
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
21_Blessings

Joined: 02 Nov 2003 Posts: 1556 Location: Living vicariously through my Lakers Dyansty DVDs
|
Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 3:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think Bynum's problem is he doesn't know how to use his athleticism and body correctly yet. He is still raw.
Playing more minutes will alleviate that problem, but will probably take 2-3 more years.
Bynum looked very good in that video. All that criticism from game 1 about 'holding the ball' was not any of those highlights. Bynum looked very decisive and his passing was crisp.
Also, Farmar  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mm708

Joined: 17 Jun 2005 Posts: 182
|
Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 5:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| How does rapidshare work? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Freakout
Joined: 06 May 2005 Posts: 282
|
Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 5:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Anyone else's video lockup at the 40 second mark? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Murdock

Joined: 28 Nov 2005 Posts: 569
|
Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 8:43 pm Post subject: Re: Bynum's athleticism deceptive? |
|
|
| la3346 wrote: |
Check out this dunk by Tyrus Thomas:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ldgQbvC_tfg&search=tyrus%20thomas
Pretty impressive right? But then compare that with this
and you'll see that Bynum's hands are actually a bit higher than Thomas'(pause Thomas' dunk, at no point, his hands are higher than Bynum's.)
Here's the video of Bynum's dunk:
http://rapidshare.de/files/25417031/SPL-070906-1stHalf.mpg.html
You can tell that Thomas were running at full steam while Bynum is standing still.
Now Tyrus Thomas has a standing reach of 9'0 and a max vertical of 39", and a max jumping reach of 12'3(you can get this just by adding those two together). According to Mitch, Bynum can reach 9 inches above the top of the backboard inner square, which is 22 inches high(it's actually 18 inches, but the lines add 2 inches each), which would make his max reach 12'7.
Now Bynum is rumored to have a 33" standing vertical and a 37" max vertical, add them together and it would come out 12'3 for standing vertical and 12'7 for max reach. Well, 12'3 is Thomas running(max) reach, and we can see in the video that Thomas's running jump(max) reach is equal to Bynum's standing vertical reach, so clearly he's not lying.
What's even more impressive is that Howard has a max reach of 12'6, so Bynum can actually reach 1" higher than Howard.
However, if you look at the video of Bynum's dunk, Bynum sure didn't "look" explosive. What I'd like to see is someone to throw Bynum a lob pass while he gets a full head of steam, perhaps then we'll see his explosiveness. |
Yo man can you tell where i can find 2nd half ... and where do you post the videos of SPL of other games ... thnx |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tai Mai Shu

Joined: 23 Jun 2004 Posts: 590 Location: North Hollywood, CA
|
Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 9:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mm708 wrote: |
| How does rapidshare work? |
click the "Free" button...then wait like 30 seconds, enter the code int he box and download. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Triumph Jelani

Joined: 18 Oct 2004 Posts: 3872 Location: Las Vegas
|
Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 11:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
get back on the block & show me something. _________________

F' KG, RAY, & PAUL. I'm rollin' with KB, LO, Drew, Pau, & Fish |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
damNzzi~

Joined: 12 Apr 2005 Posts: 519
|
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 5:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think people read too much into vertical stuff nowadays...
I think it mattered alot before, because the tempo of the game was slower. If a guy could jump high, he would dunk on people. Guys had some time to gather and do their moves.
In today's league i think that vertical is VERY overrated facet of a player's athleticism. Explosiveness is WAY more important, because people get faster,stronger and the game is played at faster pace.
Why do you think Amaré dunked on people like nothing? It isn't like he has out-of-this-world vertical jumping ability...
The guy is SUPER-explosive. He can explode any second and dunk on someone. Same goes for guys like Kobe,T-Mac and Shaq (just for example) whom can explode anytime. We have seen Kobe explode for a block in a millisecond.
Bynum isn't by any means explosive (amare-like), but his vertical is pretty fine. That's why it takes time for him to dunk. He can't and won't just explode in traffic and facialise people. It's just not his game because his physicue doesn't allow it.
What if he would be explosive? There's another Shaq for you right there. Elite size, good vertical and vgood work ethic.
It's just that you can't have it all. Shaq didn't have the work ethic.  _________________ Kobe wanted a team of his own. Now let's see how it will work out....
-- The Passion of the Kobe |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mpresev

Joined: 22 Jun 2006 Posts: 187
|
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 6:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Frankly, besides Shaq. Who is the 2nd best Center? to me it's Bynum even though he hasn't really played yet I just know he is the next best center... WE might see this this year. _________________ "I smoke but do not inhale" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KB24@CL Clublakers Moderator

Joined: 22 Jun 2004 Posts: 39618 Location: always in the near...
|
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 6:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| mpresev wrote: |
| Frankly, besides Shaq. Who is the 2nd best Center? to me it's Bynum even though he hasn't really played yet I just know he is the next best center... WE might see this this year. |
Ever heared of the Chinese Wall? well most likely not because then you would no that Shaq isn´t the best C in the league. _________________
"It is not how big you are, it is how big you play"
"Basketball doesn't build character. It reveals it"
"Be strong in body, clean in mind, lofty in ideals" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
damNzzi~

Joined: 12 Apr 2005 Posts: 519
|
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 7:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| mpresev wrote: |
| Frankly, besides Shaq. Who is the 2nd best Center? to me it's Bynum even though he hasn't really played yet I just know he is the next best center... WE might see this this year. |
Stop posting, please.
Zo'
Shaq
Yao
Gasol
Amare
Miller
J'Oneal
Kaman
Kandiman
Bogut
Magloire
Wallace
Krstic
etc etc.
All better than Bynum  _________________ Kobe wanted a team of his own. Now let's see how it will work out....
-- The Passion of the Kobe |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KB24@CL Clublakers Moderator

Joined: 22 Jun 2004 Posts: 39618 Location: always in the near...
|
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 7:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
I agree with all but Kandiman...Bynum > Kandiman _________________
"It is not how big you are, it is how big you play"
"Basketball doesn't build character. It reveals it"
"Be strong in body, clean in mind, lofty in ideals" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
High IQ

Joined: 20 Mar 2004 Posts: 12066 Location: EU Latvia Riga
|
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 9:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
hell even Mihm is somehow better than Bynum RIGHT NOW. _________________ R.I.P. TI |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
karacha

Joined: 01 Nov 2005 Posts: 15499
|
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 9:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
^
Why even Mihm - Mihm is a legit starter, and many teams in the league could use him irght now. Bynum has more potential than Mihm, sure - but Mihm has a lot of experience as a backup center and as a starter.
I believe Bynum will develop into a very solid starting NBA center. Everything over that is just gravy. Because good real centers are rare. If you look at the list above - sure it's true. Most of those guys are better players than Socks (right now). But how many legit centers do we see there?
Shaq, Yao, Miller, Kaman, Krstic, maybe Ben... that's pretty much it.
In the worst case, Bynum should be very good defensive center. Someone who can alter and block shots and push people around. Because he will be a huge 300-pound man soon. _________________
www.myspace.com/karacha |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
la3346

Joined: 30 May 2006 Posts: 2775
|
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 10:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Sorry, but Mihm isn't capapble of averaging 17, 9 and 3, in any league. I'd be surprised if Bynum doesn't take his spot, if not even start, by the end of the season. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bb7793

Joined: 08 Nov 2005 Posts: 1322 Location: Ya momma's house
|
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 10:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Hopefully not a Jerome james clone |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KB24@CL Clublakers Moderator

Joined: 22 Jun 2004 Posts: 39618 Location: always in the near...
|
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 10:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| bb7793 wrote: |
| Hopefully not a Jerome james clone |
Jerome James averages 5 and 3. i think if Bynum now plays anything close to 20 minutes he can put up better numbers than 5 and 3. thats for sure. _________________
"It is not how big you are, it is how big you play"
"Basketball doesn't build character. It reveals it"
"Be strong in body, clean in mind, lofty in ideals" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|