| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Johnnyboy
Joined: 25 Oct 2005 Posts: 713
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
scissors

Joined: 09 Apr 2007 Posts: 1220
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| still need a point guard. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
davriver290

Joined: 17 Jun 2006 Posts: 2923
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
um, lakers are trying to get Camby. _________________ There are so many emotions at the end of the season, nobody likes to talk about it. But one of them is fear, fear that you come this far and it can all end. The dream could die. But me? I like the fear, it means I'm close. It means...... I'm ready.
-Kobe Bryant and Shaquille Oneal. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Johnnyboy
Joined: 25 Oct 2005 Posts: 713
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 10:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ^^That's the point. Get Camby and ship him for the oneal trade. That way you keep Bynum. And of course we need a PG. But there is no quick solution for that other than the MLE which wouldn't get us anything spectacular. But Odom/Bynum +19 is WAY to much for oneal. The trade above lets you keep Bynum, and we still improve as a team. That means Management is happy and kobe/fans are happy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mark McNamara

Joined: 08 Nov 2004 Posts: 1268 Location: L.A.
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 11:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Indy's rebuilding. Why would they want Camby and his contract instead of Bynum? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Geno

Joined: 09 Apr 2007 Posts: 189 Location: Downtown, Los Angeles
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 11:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Mark McNamara wrote: |
| Indy's rebuilding. Why would they want Camby and his contract instead of Bynum? |
Well their new coach said he wanted to make the playoffs next season so maybe they're better off with a veteran DPOY then an unproven 19 year old. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Johnnyboy
Joined: 25 Oct 2005 Posts: 713
|
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 12:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
^ exactly.
You can't just have a bunch of rookies running around. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|