Club Lakers Logo Contest
>> You are now on the new server. Please report problems to clublakers@gmail.com <<
FAQFAQ  SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

President of the United States of America 09
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 23, 24, 25 ... 34, 35, 36  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Lakers Forum Forum Index -> Open Court
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Who Will You Vote For?
Barack Obama
56%
 56%  [ 117 ]
Hilary Clinton
15%
 15%  [ 32 ]
Rudy Giuliani
3%
 3%  [ 8 ]
Ron Paul
14%
 14%  [ 31 ]
Mitt Romney
2%
 2%  [ 5 ]
John Edwards
3%
 3%  [ 7 ]
John McCain
3%
 3%  [ 8 ]
Total Votes : 208

Author Message
BB



Joined: 07 Apr 2008
Posts: 785
Location: Bucharest, Romania

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 1:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Satan, do you believe in communism? Because that's what you're going to that.

In a country like yours, I'd work a normal job and just move some papers there and here. If I get fired, so be it. You'd have social plans for me. lol. Why bother to work as hard as I can when it's not rewarding?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Satan



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 18678
Location: Fist in the air in the land of hypocricy.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 1:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

BB wrote:
Well, not everyone is born intelligent either so let's all act like retards because we're all just as worthy.


I'm not suggesting anyone dumb themselves down, I just think everyone should be rewarded for hard work.


BB wrote:
Life is unfair.


I agree, which is why I believe we shouldn't make it even more unfair by perpetuating a system which rewards the few a the expense of the many.


BB wrote:
And I don't get why you should be at the top of the pyramid or have a shot at being there.


No one should be given a position at the top but what's wrong with an equal playing field that allows all to achieve their potential and rewards all for hard work?


BB wrote:
If I'd be rich, I'd just get an off-shore company and not pay taxes at all. Why would I anyways? It's not like it's worth it.


Yet another reason to limit wealth accumulation. A harmonious society cannot exist when some are not invested in that society.

BB wrote:
And to be honest, I wouldn't want a retirement fund. I'd just save money while I work. I don't see why I'd protect those who are irresponsible and wouldn't save.


If everyone could earn a living wage from their labor, the majority of folks could afford to save money and a public retirement fund would not be necessary. As businesses have shed the responsibility of caring for workers after their retirement, governments have been forced to pick up the slack.


BB wrote:
And I might be insensitive, but I don't care about most of the people.


I think this is the key difference between us. I care about everyone. I want every man, woman and child to have the opportunity to live a good life.

There is also a more realistic view that regardless of me caring about others or not, their lives affect mine. A poor man might rob me out of necessity. An uneducated child might get involved in gangs and kill my child. We're all connected in society whether we like it or not. Helping out those most in need helps us all.


BB wrote:
I know that no matter what happens, I'll get into my 40s with enough money to never work again, from modeling or something else.


I don't suggest economic policies for my personal advantage, I've done well enough for myself in a capitalistic mode.

_________________

Following the rights movements you clamped on with your iron fists, drugs became conveniently available for all the kids, Following the rights movements you clamped on with your iron fists, drugs became conveniently available for all the kids - System of a Down, Prison Song
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Barnstable



Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 5067
Location: Tacoma, WA

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 1:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

John3:16 wrote:
Satan wrote:
John3:16 wrote:
So they all should own a piece of it and make it into what it is, for $200 an hour ?


Hopefully they could do better. MS makes crap software and enjoys it's place in the world due to its ruthless, monopolistic business practices.

Not all of them should make $200/hour either, I'd put that as the ceiling.


Why should someone try to find a cure for cancer when the ceiling is $200 ? Why should people take risks for $200 (or less) an hour? Why should people put in that extra something when it won't be rewarded? Why take pride in what you do when you know it'll never be rewarded?


Are you seriously arguing $200 and hour isn't enough? freak2

That is more than enough of a financial motivation for any ocupation in this country. Anything more is just greed and excess.

People don't need billions of dollars and won't even spend it all in there kids lifetimes.
_________________
Sweet Daddy Barnstable's Bad A** Broads:
(1)Beyonce (2) Jennifer Lopez- Era 2000 (3) Layla Kayleigh (4) K.D. Aubert (5) Stacy Dash (6) Tyra Banks- Era 1998 (7) Shakira (8) Rose McGowan (9) Dolicia Bryan (10) Alyssa Milano

TEAM FARMAR Member Since 11/18/07
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BB



Joined: 07 Apr 2008
Posts: 785
Location: Bucharest, Romania

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 1:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hard work shouldn't be rewarded. Risks and quality of work should be rewarded. I could care the less how hard is for someone to do what I do in 2 hours, in 2 weeks.

And most people are irresponsible and stupid. Why would you reward those at the expense of the others?

And I wouldn't want to be part of ones society where my work is hindered because of the dumb people. I'd just gather enough money with others and buy my own country where I can do whatever. If you want something unfair, look at how overpaid Americans are compared to Chinese, Mexicans and whoever does the same work. Isn't this the biggest unfair factor? I mean, they even do the same thing, yet they make less. It's not the difference in the field as employee or entrepeneur.

It's not a businesses job to take care of what you'll do when you won't work for them anymore. If you'd put in an account those x% you pay to the gov, you'd have money when you'd want to stop working, without all the dumb regulations that govs have for their retirement funds.


You didn't answer to me if you support communist ideas. :P And some other stuff.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Satan



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 18678
Location: Fist in the air in the land of hypocricy.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 1:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

John3:16 wrote:
Why should someone try to find a cure for cancer when the ceiling is $200 ?


Because it would save countless lives? Because they'd be known as one of the greatest medical minds in history? Academic interest?

It's not like $200/hour isn't more than enough to live extremely comfortably.


John3:16 wrote:
Why should people take risks for $200 (or less) an hour? Why should people put in that extra something when it won't be rewarded? Why take pride in what you do when you know it'll never be rewarded?


You make it sound like cash is the only worthwhile reward. A teacher or coach can take pride in positively influencing youth. A policeman for making his community safer. A lawyer for defending justice. A janitor in creating a sanitary environment.





BB wrote:
Satan, do you believe in communism? Because that's what you're going to that.

In a country like yours, I'd work a normal job and just move some papers there and here. If I get fired, so be it. You'd have social plans for me. lol. Why bother to work as hard as I can when it's not rewarding?


I believe that the idea of communism is very attractive but most likely unreachable in my lifetime. Not communism as it has been called in countries like the USSR or China but the final stage Marx spoke of when government would "melt away", true communism. Now if we only had a few million people on this planet...

You make it sound like it our current society we don't have folks who just sit around and push papers without caring about their job or getting fired. Giving them a decent wage might just motivate them to do a better job. Removing wealth as the only objective for working would give them even more motivation.

I'm not suggesting a free ride for those able to work, just a reasonable compensation for their labor.

_________________

Following the rights movements you clamped on with your iron fists, drugs became conveniently available for all the kids, Following the rights movements you clamped on with your iron fists, drugs became conveniently available for all the kids - System of a Down, Prison Song
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
BB



Joined: 07 Apr 2008
Posts: 785
Location: Bucharest, Romania

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Satan, your ideas work only if people would be the same. Guess what? People aren't the same. Even if you'd take all the money away now, in 2-3 generations we'd be back, because most people are just pathetic sheep. Nobody in this world has the same amount of determination, looks, brains, ambition as others. If you put all that too good work in a competitive ambient(10 times the amount for someone with an IQ of 160 over some guy who just cleans the floors with an IQ of 80 and with the same differences in the other categories is just laughable).

Marx also said that a theory is good only when it can be successfully applied in practice(in case you read his books you know this)... Guess what, communism can't be applied in practice because of the differences and things I stated before. In a perfect society in which all the scrubs would be removed, yes, it could be applied. Otherwise, it can't.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Satan



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 18678
Location: Fist in the air in the land of hypocricy.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

BB wrote:
Hard work shouldn't be rewarded. Risks and quality of work should be rewarded. I could care the less how hard is for someone to do what I do in 2 hours, in 2 weeks.


If risk is always rewarded, it's not risk anymore.

Of course quality of work matters, this is where the income range comes into play. The effort one puts in matters just as much though, this is where the minimum comes into play.


BB wrote:
And most people are irresponsible and stupid. Why would you reward those at the expense of the others?


Who's expense? People are being fairly compensated for their labor, not given handouts.

I disagree that most folks are irresponsible and stupid. I think that given the chance, the majority of folks can and will be contributing members of society.


BB wrote:
And I wouldn't want to be part of ones society where my work is hindered because of the dumb people.


How would you be hindered at all?

BB wrote:
I'd just gather enough money with others and buy my own country where I can do whatever.


Well, in my world, their would be no countries or borders. You're out of luck sugar!

BB wrote:
If you want something unfair, look at how overpaid Americans are compared to Chinese, Mexicans and whoever does the same work. Isn't this the biggest unfair factor? I mean, they even do the same thing, yet they make less.


I totally agree. Part of why this would be a worldwide set up for me.

BB wrote:
It's not a businesses job to take care of what you'll do when you won't work for them anymore. If you'd put in an account those x% you pay to the gov, you'd have money when you'd want to stop working, without all the dumb regulations that govs have for their retirement funds.


Hey, I'm all for abolishing federal taxes and keeping taxation local, that way people can live where they agree with local taxes and those local community organizations can contribute to larger organizations if they feel it's necessary or they derive benefit.

Companies traditionally provided for workers after retirement because those workers gave up their best years to those jobs. Obviously the old cannot work as much as the young. Common ownership of the means of production would also ensure that the retired would have adequate financial support.

_________________

Following the rights movements you clamped on with your iron fists, drugs became conveniently available for all the kids, Following the rights movements you clamped on with your iron fists, drugs became conveniently available for all the kids - System of a Down, Prison Song
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Satan



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 18678
Location: Fist in the air in the land of hypocricy.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

BB wrote:
Satan, your ideas work only if people would be the same. Guess what? People aren't the same. Even if you'd take all the money away now, in 2-3 generations we'd be back, because most people are just pathetic sheep. Nobody in this world has the same amount of determination, looks, brains, ambition as others.


I tend to believe that while their are obviously differences, people are essentially very similar to each other, particularly at birth. I also believe that the reverse of what you say is true, the longer a system is in place, the more likely it is to remain in place. After a few generations, people would look back in disbelief at the laughable organization our society has today.


BB wrote:
If you put all that too good work in a competitive ambient(10 times the amount for someone with an IQ of 160 over some guy who just cleans the floors with an IQ of 80 and with the same differences in the other categories is just laughable).


Sorry, I don't follow what you're saying here.

BB wrote:
Marx also said that a theory is good only when it can be successfully applied in practice(in case you read his books you know this)... Guess what, communism can't be applied in practice because of the differences and things I stated before. In a perfect society in which all the scrubs would be removed, yes, it could be applied. Otherwise, it can't.


A good old fashion Stalinist/Maoist purge of the lumpenproletariat!

Like I said earlier, I don't believe that the world as it currently stands is prepared for a true communist society in our lifetimes but I do believe it is eventually attainable, with the proper education and world view. I don't believe there is anything in mankind which is inherently greedy or selfish, outside of pure survival instincts. I feel the socio-economic systems (rule by kings, merchants and now capitalism) that have ruled recent history are to blame.

_________________

Following the rights movements you clamped on with your iron fists, drugs became conveniently available for all the kids, Following the rights movements you clamped on with your iron fists, drugs became conveniently available for all the kids - System of a Down, Prison Song
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
BB



Joined: 07 Apr 2008
Posts: 785
Location: Bucharest, Romania

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Satan, I was taking about things that can be applied. OF course, in my world nobody will be sick, work or pay taxes because robots will do everything, even breathe for us. Ideals are ideals because they're never real. :)

And I didn't mean that risk should always be rewarded. I f'ed up a lot in my life when I took the wrong chances. I bought the wrong things, I lost money. It happens and you learn from it.

And the effort matters as long as it's phesable(sp). He's getting paid as much as his work is worth. Effort and failing at the thing you put your effort in... Why would you reward that?

Ok, how many people know the backgrounds about the candidates that run this year, know their strategies and how they'll affect their lives, can do their taxes without help from others better than some 20 years old model from 5000 miles away... It's pretty said I know more about the 2008 US election than a lot of people there. That's irresponsible. And most people know less about things that will affect their future. It's pretty sad that the American society is irresponsible(some Americans agree with me btw). My expense for instance. I'm smarter than most people, look better than most people and I'm more modest than most people(jk :P)... Why would I get taxed with 40% just because I make what I'm worth? While someone who is dumb and just moves papers gets taxed with 16%. I just put some numbers. lol. sry if I type badly, but I have my hands injured and you're making me write books. :P
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BB



Joined: 07 Apr 2008
Posts: 785
Location: Bucharest, Romania

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

We have persons:
1)IQ:160
He is willing to work overtime, highly competitive, ambitious and determined.
2)IQ:80
Lazy, doesn't like work, takes a lot of time to do a thing.

Why would 1 get paid only 10 more than 2? He'd probably do what 2 does in a month in a day.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Satan



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 18678
Location: Fist in the air in the land of hypocricy.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

BB wrote:
Satan, I was taking about things that can be applied. OF course, in my world nobody will be sick, work or pay taxes because robots will do everything, even breathe for us. Ideals are ideals because they're never real. :)


I like to live in reality but strive for the ideal. I'm not advocating full on communism in this thread but I do stand by the idea of a living wage minimum for workers as well as a ceiling.

BB wrote:
And the effort matters as long as it's phesable(sp). He's getting paid as much as his work is worth. Effort and failing at the thing you put your effort in... Why would you reward that?


AS much as his work is worth to who? If a handful of people control the majority of the wealth, as is the case today, the work of the masses is worth little to those who control the purse strings.

If there is common ownership of the means of production, their is no rewarder or rewardee, the worker labors for his own good. No one is giving anyone else anything, people are earning it.


BB wrote:
It's pretty said I know more about the 2008 US election than a lot of people there. That's irresponsible. And most people know less about things that will affect their future. It's pretty sad that the American society is irresponsible(some Americans agree with me btw).


I agree with all of this. While of course the individual can look for themselves, our society definitely encourages this ignorance. Our news media, controlled by the same corporate interests that are determining the outcomes of the elections, spend time asking if Obama "is black enough" instead of asking what his economic policies are or what he would do about Iraq. We're bombarded with news about gay marriage instead of the deteriorating state of our infrastructure. Our schools don't teach critical thinking, they prepare students to pass tests so the schools continue to get funding.

BB wrote:
My expense for instance. I'm smarter than most people, look better than most people and I'm more modest than most people(jk :P)... Why would I get taxed with 40% just because I make what I'm worth? While someone who is dumb and just moves papers gets taxed with 16%. I just put some numbers. lol. sry if I type badly, but I have my hands injured and you're making me write books. :P


Because you can afford it. Because your contribution leads to a better society for everyone involved, yourself included.
_________________

Following the rights movements you clamped on with your iron fists, drugs became conveniently available for all the kids, Following the rights movements you clamped on with your iron fists, drugs became conveniently available for all the kids - System of a Down, Prison Song
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Satan



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 18678
Location: Fist in the air in the land of hypocricy.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

BB wrote:
We have persons:
1)IQ:160
He is willing to work overtime, highly competitive, ambitious and determined.
2)IQ:80
Lazy, doesn't like work, takes a lot of time to do a thing.

Why would 1 get paid only 10 more than 2? He'd probably do what 2 does in a month in a day.


Why focus on extremes at either end? The majority of folks won't fall under either category but somewhere in between.

I don't seek to reward laziness. At the same time, I think most folks wouldn't be lazy if they were employed in a field they enjoy. I think more people would pursue their interests if they weren't just chasing $$$.

Even if some slip through the cracks and we have a lazy guy making $20/hour, is that worse than some CEO making hundreds of millions of dollars while the company he runs loses money hand over fist?

_________________

Following the rights movements you clamped on with your iron fists, drugs became conveniently available for all the kids, Following the rights movements you clamped on with your iron fists, drugs became conveniently available for all the kids - System of a Down, Prison Song
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
BB



Joined: 07 Apr 2008
Posts: 785
Location: Bucharest, Romania

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I already contribute to the society through my work. Doing it from my wage would be stupid and should be left to charity. In an ideal world, people would do charity all thte time. :P

I'd like to debate more, but my boyfriend wants to go to bed and I'll join. :) Good night.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
John3:16



Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 15301
Location: Begging Mitch to trade O Freaking Dumb

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 5:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Barnstable wrote:
Are you seriously arguing $200 and hour isn't enough? freak2


You're an artist. Paint a nice picture for me and I'll give you $200 for it. Then I'll draw you a stick figure and you pay me $200. Hey, my abilities aren't the same as yours. Don't hold it against me.

freak2
_________________

ATGROO (Anything To Get Rid Of Odumb)
Try not to cry: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kerMm0HG1mk or this one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cyheJ480LYA or this one http://cjcphoto.com/can/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
slimjim



Joined: 31 May 2005
Posts: 8046

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 6:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

life is unfair.
a communist based on theory alone... is fair.

why was karl marx wrong? he theorized a society after our current capitalist one. communism. the final step in the social evolution of humankind.

a small basic summary for background information.
people will be fed up with the inequity of wealth and revolt. they will demand 100% equality. everyone paid the same, no one above anyone.

so... why has this not happened? it seems like a nice idea on paper, what did karl marx theorize wrong? why have we not reached the final stage in human societal evolution?

self-interest, acquiring more capital some argue... is an inherent human trait. it's how we survive, it's our natural instinct. we become stronger, faster, work harder, learn more, improve our lively hoods and those around us... a basic survival instinct.

the weak die off, the strong survive. those that don't collect enough capital? will live shorter and less fulfilling lives.
humans are no longer in such a basic societal state... we more or less have this trait inside us.

implementing a capitalist or a communist or a socialist economic system will not change what we as humans are born with, the instinct to survive.

so here's the problem, bottlenecks will occur with communism. our natural drive for success and self-interest is stunted or hindered.

why bother improving cellphones, TVs, medicine, transportation, etc if our natural drive for success is not rewarded?


in a capitalist society we are rewarded for these basic human instincts, and it is evident, harder workers are generally paid more, more education means more money, faster, stronger athletes are the ones with most capital... we are in control of our lives, you want to work hard? you will be rewarded, you want to be a slob and smoke weed everyday? don't expect anything back.


I'm not gonna get into the 3rd world inequalities.... that deserves a thread of it's own.
_________________

Live, Love, Laugh
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
slimjim



Joined: 31 May 2005
Posts: 8046

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 6:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

BTW,

we are not paid based on quality or quantity of work exclusively.

only one thing is certain... we are paid based on how much we can generate for the company or help society as a whole.

kobe can generate millions for the lakers. he will be paid millions of dollars.
a guy at Macdonald's does not generate millions, so he won't be paid millions.

a college educated guy can potentially generate a lot more than a lazy slob with no education whatsoever... and should be paid accordingly.

this is also why we as a society look down on spoiled rich kids like Nicole Richie and Paris Hilton. they are handed millions of dollars from there parents, but are no where near qualified to generate such an amount.
_________________

Live, Love, Laugh
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kingsama



Joined: 14 Jan 2005
Posts: 4142
Location: Tejas

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 7:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

for someone who sure hates governments satan, you sure seem to want to give them more money and control...
_________________
"God creates out of nothing. Wonderful you say. Yes, to be sure, but he does what is still more wonderful: he makes saints out of sinners."
"The highest and most beautiful things in life are not to be heard about, nor read about, nor seen but, if one will, are to be lived."
- Soren Kierkegaard
Why Lock? Its not even funny what he said. KingSTUPID, how about that CrazylikeCatfish why dont you laugh at that. - wezzy509
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Aonex



Joined: 13 Jun 2003
Posts: 4456
Location: NYC

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sure lot of Ayn Rand reading laissez-faire capitalists on this board. How quickly we forget what took place in the 19th century, before minimum wages, anti-trust regulation, etc. Maybe I missed it, but I don't see where Satan is proposing a full on socialist economic system. Just like social democracies in Europe, there is a middle ground, at least one that can achieve an adequate living wage in our society, so we don't have people living in extreme poverty while living in the wealthiest nation in the world. And as Slim mentioned, we can't discuss capitalism in a vacuum in this globalized day and age... eh, but who cares about the developing world, right?
_________________
WTB witty sig
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Barnstable



Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 5067
Location: Tacoma, WA

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 11:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

John3:16 wrote:
Barnstable wrote:
Are you seriously arguing $200 and hour isn't enough? freak2


You're an artist. Paint a nice picture for me and I'll give you $200 for it. Then I'll draw you a stick figure and you pay me $200. Hey, my abilities aren't the same as yours. Don't hold it against me.

freak2


I never said everyone should get the same pay. I said $200 per hour is enough of a ceiling for any profession in the US.

And remember, I didn't say $200 is enough pay for anything, I said $200 an hour is enough. That's $1,600 for an eight hour day freak2

Nobodies arguing everyone should get paid the same regardless of ability (I don't know why it's always misconstrued as such) just that at a certain point, the amount your making is in excess of what you need and could even spend realistically during your lifetime (and kids lifetime). That excess contributes to crime and the general miserable lifestyle of the poor.

Why should greed be acceptable in society?

And............ yes please......... pay me $200 and hour and I'll paint a detailed closeup of your pubic hair if you want me too mhihi
_________________
Sweet Daddy Barnstable's Bad A** Broads:
(1)Beyonce (2) Jennifer Lopez- Era 2000 (3) Layla Kayleigh (4) K.D. Aubert (5) Stacy Dash (6) Tyra Banks- Era 1998 (7) Shakira (8) Rose McGowan (9) Dolicia Bryan (10) Alyssa Milano

TEAM FARMAR Member Since 11/18/07
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
slimjim



Joined: 31 May 2005
Posts: 8046

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 11:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

kobe bryant.
can generate WAY more than $200 an hour. why should he be paid $200?

there is no reason for a cap on "wages". if someone is willing to pay kobe millions and millions of dollars, it's justified (at least in most cases)
_________________

Live, Love, Laugh
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Coville



Joined: 30 Dec 2004
Posts: 6926

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 11:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Woah go BB. bow
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Coville



Joined: 30 Dec 2004
Posts: 6926

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 11:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kingsama wrote:
for someone who sure hates governments satan, you sure seem to want to give them more money and control...



agree.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Coville



Joined: 30 Dec 2004
Posts: 6926

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 11:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

putting price caps on anything is lunacy.

didn't good old bill do that with flu shots in his term? didn't companies stop making flu shots? wasn't there some massive shortage.

i may be mistaken, but i remember an incident like that..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
slimjim



Joined: 31 May 2005
Posts: 8046

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 11:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Coville wrote:
putting price caps on anything is lunacy.

didn't good old bill do that with flu shots in his term? didn't companies stop making flu shots? wasn't there some massive shortage.

i may be mistaken, but i remember an incident like that..


you can't compare demand/supply price ceilings to wage rate caps. (lemme explain)

if you cut wages... there won't be a shortage of workers... because those highly skilled workers will still have to work to make a living... even if it's way less than they deserve. (kobe for example)

the problem is... what becomes the standard? what becomes the minimum wage? if you put a cap on something... the entire wage system will be drastically changed.

those that were paid $200 dollars before the cap are now making less (for example... $180), because higher skilled workers now hold those positions... the 180's get knocked down a notch to $150, which get knocked down a notch to $130, etc, etc. who's at the bottom? those that need it the most, the ones barely scratching by paycheck to paycheck.

and lastly... my main point...

wage expense will drop as a whole... what does this mean? MORE MONEY MORE PROFIT FOR THE BIG COMPANIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

take money away from the rich? it goes right into the big companies pockets.

you see why all this economic talk is so confusing? there are negatives and positives to everything you do. you solved one problem? okay... you just created another one.

_________________

Live, Love, Laugh


Last edited by slimjim on Fri Apr 25, 2008 11:49 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
John3:16



Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 15301
Location: Begging Mitch to trade O Freaking Dumb

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 11:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Barnstable wrote:
Why should greed be acceptable in society?


Well, ladies and gentlemen we're not here to indulge in fantasy but in political and economic reality. America has become a second-rate power. Its trade deficit and its fiscal deficit are at nightmare proportions. Now, in the days of the free market when our country was a top industrial power, there was accountability to the stockholder. The DarthRekals, the Sirronstuff's, the men that built this great industrial empire, made sure of it because it was their money at stake. Today, management has no stake in the company! All together, these men sitting up here own less than three percent of the company. And where does Mr. Satan put his million-dollar salary? Not in ClubLakers stock; he owns less than zero percent. You own the company. That's right, you, the poster. And you are all being royally screwed over by these, these moderators, with their locks, their rules and no cussing, their fancy titles and secret forums.

Moderator: This is an outrage! You're out of line John!

ClubLakers, Mr. Barnstable, ClubLakers has 33 different moderators each earning over 200 thousand dollars a year. Now, I have spent the last two months analyzing what all these guys do, and I still can't figure it out. One thing I do know is that ClubLakers lost 110 million dollars last year, and I'll bet that half of that was spent in all the locking of valuable threads going back and forth between all these moderators. The new law of evolution in corporate America seems to be survival of the unfittest. Well, in my book you either do it right or you get eliminated. In the last seven threads that I've been involved with, there were 2.5 million members who have made a pretax profit of 12 billion dollars. Thank you. I am not a destroyer of threads. I am a liberator of them! The point is, ladies and gentleman, that greed, for lack of a better word, is good. Greed is right, greed works. Greed clarifies, cuts through, and captures the essence of the evolutionary spirit. Greed, in all of its forms; greed for life, for money, for love, knowledge has marked the upward surge of mankind. And greed, you mark my words, will not only save ClubLakers, but that other malfunctioning corporation called ESPN.

Thank you very much.
_________________

ATGROO (Anything To Get Rid Of Odumb)
Try not to cry: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kerMm0HG1mk or this one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cyheJ480LYA or this one http://cjcphoto.com/can/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BB



Joined: 07 Apr 2008
Posts: 785
Location: Bucharest, Romania

PostPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 2:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

slimjim, Kobe wouldn't exist because they won't be able to pay him for endorsements because it would be over the ceiling of the cap, no endorsements, no fame in basketball, [Swearing is not permitted at Clublakers. You must edit this post prior to submitting.] pay, why would I train my whole life for it etc.

And slimjim is right, as I said earlier it's all about quality of work, aka productivity. Results/paycheck. So yes, we are paid by our quality of work mostly. Of course, I was comparing people in the same field, because wages depend on fields.

Karl Marx was wrong because he didn't realize that by treating everyone as equal, they will become equal, by not by becoming better, but by becoming worse. The equality will be done at the lower level because those at the lower levels can't elevate to the higher ones and those at the higher ones would be treated the same, so they wouldn't care about being on those high levels due to it not being worthy. And this is what happens when you apply communism in practice.

And Satan, you focus on the extremes(really wealthy, really poor, which aren't many) so why wouldn't I? :)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message