| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Darth Bynumite

Joined: 17 Jan 2008 Posts: 2156 Location: London, England
|
Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 3:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Sky wrote: |
Jesus, one more out of control solo 1-on-3 layup attempt trying to draw the foul brick oops easy 2 the other way play from Fish and I will finally succeed in getting my hands through the tv screen and around Derek's neck. You cannot finish! CANNOT! You SUCK at it. You've ALWAYS sucked at it. You are not a finisher, you are not a highwire athlete. Stop trying to be a hero, stop the blasted forced finishes you KNOW won't succeed and play within your freaking limits! |
The problem is, sometimes he gets space and he takes it to the hoop and he STILL can't finish at the hoop. I mean it's just part of Basketball, when you get space and room, take it to the basket. In Fisher's case though, he should just stay away from the Basket all together. I think Fisher has to learn, as you said, that he's a shooter and that's it.vHe knows the triangle, he shoots well, gets critical turnovers and provides leadership. That's Fisher's game. Fisher taking Kobe shots and taking it to the hoop is like Kwame doing anything offensively, it's just not his game.
I agree. _________________ "I'll do whatever it takes to win games, whether it's sitting on a bench waving a towel, handing a cup of water to a teammate, or hitting the game-winning shot. " - Kobe Bryant. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LakerzDQ

Joined: 26 Mar 2008 Posts: 591
|
Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 3:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't understand why Fisher can't finish even the easiest of layups. I don't expect him to do circus shots, but sometimes he can't even finish a completely open layup.
but he's been doing great vs. Deron Williams so far. This is the playoffs, where Fisher steps his game up. I love him so far in the playoffs. he's gonna be huge for us down the stretch. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
7co7dy

Joined: 09 May 2008 Posts: 161 Location: in the gym working on my J
|
Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 8:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| LakerzDQ wrote: |
I don't understand why Fisher can't finish even the easiest of layups. I don't expect him to do circus shots, but sometimes he can't even finish a completely open layup.
but he's been doing great vs. Deron Williams so far. This is the playoffs, where Fisher steps his game up. I love him so far in the playoffs. he's gonna be huge for us down the stretch. |
that's what Fish is for and it's also exactly why I was glad we signed him, for the payoffs. _________________ uhh, i'll write a signature when I think of something cool. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
karacha

Joined: 01 Nov 2005 Posts: 15732
|
Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 9:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
About Fish and layups... he should really just take a mid-range jumper instead of driving, even when he has space. Layup is a low % shot for Derek. Just hit the open J, 2 pts is 2 pts anyway. _________________
www.myspace.com/karacha |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
djblisk
Joined: 31 Mar 2007 Posts: 188
|
Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 10:08 am Post subject: superb |
|
|
| Fisher's defense has been superb these playoffs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nosebleedbum
Joined: 16 Jul 2003 Posts: 1748
|
Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 10:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Fisher's defense has been superb these playoffs. |
On iverson, no. On Deron yes. AI still avg 25 for the series.
Deron is one of those matchup more suited for Fish's style of bump and grind, flop D. With Chris Paul or Parker, Fish isn't going to be as much of a factor. He doesn't have the foot speed to get in front of those guys. Deron likes the J as much as he likes driving and has respect for Fish. Parker/ Paul/ Iverson are speed demons who get to the basket and have no problems waving bye-bye to Fish. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jimbo327
Joined: 05 Aug 2003 Posts: 10272 Location: Where Else?
|
Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 3:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I think the only reason Fish has played good defense in this series because he knows what D Will likes to do. You can sometimes see that Fish anticipates a certain move before D Will even makes it. Because we all know that Fish didn't get any quicker over the years. Fish also knows when to bump Deron to try to get him to run a different play. You can see Deron bump back to get back into the space he wanted to run a certain play, but Fish almost always beats him to that space and holds his body to not allow D Will to set up the offense. This is why I think Fish has an edge in this series because he knows how the Utah Jazz operates and their offensive schemes. I'm just surprised this knowledge wasn't transferred to Farmar. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PnOySneakerBoi24

Joined: 27 Jan 2008 Posts: 1159 Location: Walnut
|
Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 4:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hes leading in steals during postseason i believe _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kop5789
Joined: 20 Apr 2008 Posts: 504
|
Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 4:44 pm Post subject: Re: superb |
|
|
| djblisk wrote: |
| Fisher's defense has been superb these playoffs. |
IMO, no one on this team has played superb defense so far. Odom has been the closest(and statistically, our best defender during the regular season.) He's pretty much the reason why the point guards haven't gone off on us, but even then, I would only qualify it as very good. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kop5789
Joined: 20 Apr 2008 Posts: 504
|
Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 4:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| nosebleedbum wrote: |
| Quote: |
| Fisher's defense has been superb these playoffs. |
On iverson, no. On Deron yes. AI still avg 25 for the series.
Deron is one of those matchup more suited for Fish's style of bump and grind, flop D. With Chris Paul or Parker, Fish isn't going to be as much of a factor. He doesn't have the foot speed to get in front of those guys. Deron likes the J as much as he likes driving and has respect for Fish. Parker/ Paul/ Iverson are speed demons who get to the basket and have no problems waving bye-bye to Fish. |
Actually, the numbers show that Fish did a better job on Iverson than on Williams(which is my observation as well.) Points aren't everything. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mapabu1
Joined: 02 Jul 2007 Posts: 2601
|
Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 4:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Fisher's D has been very good so far |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AndrewB17

Joined: 12 May 2008 Posts: 295 Location: Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 4:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Fisher's defense has been great the 1st 2 games against Williams, but in Games 3 & 4 he quickly picked up 2 fouls and brought Famar off the bench. I do believe this series would have been 3-1 or 4-0 if Fisher didn't get in foul trouble. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kop5789
Joined: 20 Apr 2008 Posts: 504
|
Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 5:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mapabu1 wrote: |
| Fisher's D has been very good so far |
If you considered giving up 22, 11 and 5 to D-Will, all above his average good. The unfortunate thing is that it might fool some fans, but it's not fooling Jerry Sloan, who saw that he can exploit Fish quite often. That's why we couldn't get those "critical stops." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
L4L Clublakers Moderator

Joined: 18 Jun 2007 Posts: 9230 Location: Trade Rumors Forum
|
Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 6:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
^^Farmar literally assisted Williams in racking up a majority of those numbers. Fisher is currently +33.3 points per 100 possessions, in the playoffs, because of how terrible Farmar has been. A great degree of that is offensive, but 6.6 points per 48 minutes is nothing to sneeze at and that is the amount more we give up with Farmar in the game at this point. For what its worth, Farmar is currently -37.7 points per 100 possessions.
I hope you don't still think Fisher is a cancer. _________________
All-NBA Challenge Roster:
PG: Steve Nash, Stephon Marbury, Delonte West
SG: Ray Allen, Francisco Garcia, DeShawn Stevenson
SF: Paul Pierce, Shane Battier, Ruben Patterson
PF: Kevin Garnett, Kurt Thomas, Andray Blatche
C: Kendrick Perkins, Joel Przybilla, Rasho Nesterovic |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MC

Joined: 27 Jul 2005 Posts: 2553
|
Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 6:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kop5789 wrote: |
| mapabu1 wrote: |
| Fisher's D has been very good so far |
If you considered giving up 22, 11 and 5 to D-Will, all above his average good. The unfortunate thing is that it might fool some fans, but it's not fooling Jerry Sloan, who saw that he can exploit Fish quite often. That's why we couldn't get those "critical stops." |
You're kidding right
Critical stops in game 4 was not the issue, hitting shots in the overtime was
I think Farmar has more to do with Williams numbers than Fisher does in this series.
What happens when Fisher is in the game is that he's beating Williams to his comfort zones resulting in less waltzes into the paint. When Williams is on his game he is penetrating and doing his damage from the paint. When he owns the paint it creates the easy opportunities to get Boozer going and gives players like Okur the space to get off their perimeter shots. Fisher has made it tough on Williams in getting to the paint allowing the Laker bigs to react and help, when Farmar is in the game it's a free buffet in the paint and Williams is taking complete advantage. Farmar does not have the familiarity nor the physical strength to beat and hold the comfort zone spots away from Williams, especially in his horrible zombie like play as of late. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
davriver290

Joined: 17 Jun 2006 Posts: 2923
|
Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 7:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kop5789 wrote: |
| mapabu1 wrote: |
| Fisher's D has been very good so far |
If you considered giving up 22, 11 and 5 to D-Will, all above his average good. The unfortunate thing is that it might fool some fans, but it's not fooling Jerry Sloan, who saw that he can exploit Fish quite often. That's why we couldn't get those "critical stops." |
First two games williams couldnt play well until the very end when it didnt matter. And Fisher wasnt in foul trouble, Fisher IS TAKING ADVANTAGE OF Williams, the poor guy is struggling when Fisher is guarding him.
Williams had those stats because Farmar basically lets D Will do whatever he pleases. _________________ There are so many emotions at the end of the season, nobody likes to talk about it. But one of them is fear, fear that you come this far and it can all end. The dream could die. But me? I like the fear, it means I'm close. It means...... I'm ready.
-Kobe Bryant and Shaquille Oneal. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kop5789
Joined: 20 Apr 2008 Posts: 504
|
Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 7:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Farmar hasn't been playing nearly enough to say that the majority of Deron's damage has been on him. As a matter of fact, from what I've seen, our D seems to be slightly better with Farmar than with Fisher. The problem is that Farmar is sucking so much offensively that it looks like that he's playing worse D, but in reality, it's the total difference in offense and defense that makes him look worse.
I don't know where L4L got his numbers but we can always go back and break it down game-by-game "THIS" series. I would bet that, defensively only, we give up slightly more per minute to D-Will with Fisher on the floor than with Farmar on the floor. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JSM Clublakers Site Manager

Joined: 28 Apr 2003 Posts: 70472 Location: Atlanta
|
Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 7:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kop5789 wrote: |
| As a matter of fact, from what I've seen, our D seems to be slightly better with Farmar than with Fisher. |
No comment. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kop5789
Joined: 20 Apr 2008 Posts: 504
|
Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 7:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
JSM, I trust what I saw. The difference between Farmar and Fisher isn't the defense, it's the offense. Fisher is shooting 57% in this series, while Farmar is shooting a whopping 6.7%. That gives the appearance that Fisher is playing better D than Farmar, when in fact, it's his offense that's better.
Now I can't say for sure who's playing better defense without access to the numbers, but from what I've seen, our D is slightly better with Farmar than with Fisher. Even if I'm off a little bit, I can assure you that the difference between the two isn't the defense. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Thizz

Joined: 02 Dec 2004 Posts: 3698 Location: where you from?....oakland... smokin
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kop5789
Joined: 20 Apr 2008 Posts: 504
|
Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 7:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| But man, how do you shoot 6.3%(I guess 6.7 was a little generous) from the field? I knew he was doing bad, but didn't think it was THIS bad. I mean, even Smush managed to shoot in the "teens." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kop5789
Joined: 20 Apr 2008 Posts: 504
|
Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 8:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, I found the numbers, and the numbers showed that Fisher IS playing better D than Farmar, however, both are well-below average(Fisher allowing 19 PER against, Farmar 23, where 15 against is the average.) In addition, these numbers don't separate the 1st and 2nd rounds. And I never said that Fisher didn't play good D in the 1st round. After all, the numbers Iverson put up proved it(personally, I thought it was just okay, just that Iverson didn't dig hard enough, though in the end, all that matter are the numbers.) So if Fisher played good D in the 1st round, then the numbers for his 2nd round must be worse than what the current numbers showed. If we assumed that Farmar played better D in the 1st round than 2nd round, then his numbers for the 2nd round must be better than what the current average showed. Take that into account and one can say that Fisher and Farmar's D in the 2nd round is probably a wash.
In addition, I shouldn't have had to defend this Farmar vs Fisher argument in the first place, since the argument is falsely based on the premise that Fisher is playing good defense against D-Will, and that all the bad defense is being played by Farmar. Yet the numbers are showing that neither is playing good defense. In other words, once I can prove that Fisher is not playing good D, then that argument wouldn't exist. If it exists, it should be stated as: Fisher's D has been bad, but Farmar has been worse, which doesn't really negate my original argument, which is that Fisher is not playing good D on Williams. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
L4L Clublakers Moderator

Joined: 18 Jun 2007 Posts: 9230 Location: Trade Rumors Forum
|
Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 1:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You specifically stated, "If you consider __insert XXX statline from D-Will" to be good defense (all the numbers were above his averages), then, sure, D-Fish is playing good defense. The fact the numbers were above average has much less to do with Fish than it does with Farmar. 82games.com is my source by the way.
Regular Season(when playing PG):
Deron Williams: 54.4 eFG%, 24.3 points per 48, 23.4 PER
Allen Iverson: 48.0 eFG%, 30.9 points per 48, 25.4 PER
Post Season:
Deron Williams: 59.1 eFG%, 23.9 points per 48, 23.2 PER
Allen Iverson: 45.7 eFG%, 30.7 points per 48, 22.3 PER
PGs against Fisher in the post season:
43.9 eFG%, 19.7 points per 48, 20.0 PER
PGs against Farmar in the post season:
53.0 eFG%, 26.0 points per 48, 22.8 PER
The numbers speak for themselves. These guys are racking up serious digits on high efficiency when Farmar is in the game.
Though I do agree that Fisher has played worse defensively in this round. A wash though when compared to Farmar? Not a chance. _________________
All-NBA Challenge Roster:
PG: Steve Nash, Stephon Marbury, Delonte West
SG: Ray Allen, Francisco Garcia, DeShawn Stevenson
SF: Paul Pierce, Shane Battier, Ruben Patterson
PF: Kevin Garnett, Kurt Thomas, Andray Blatche
C: Kendrick Perkins, Joel Przybilla, Rasho Nesterovic
Last edited by L4L on Wed May 14, 2008 2:00 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pound4pound1

Joined: 07 Mar 2007 Posts: 3567 Location: 818 LAKER NATION
|
Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 1:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| oh syet! we have a L4L sighting |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jimbo327
Joined: 05 Aug 2003 Posts: 10272 Location: Where Else?
|
Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 2:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kop, you need some glasses if you think Farmar played any kind of defense. I saw Farmar laying out the red carpet in the paint for Deron. There was absolutely zero defense being played when Farmar vs Deron. Deron got to all the spots he wanted, he ran the pick and roll, he took it to the rack any time he felt like it. Hell, half the time, Farmar wasn't even in the frame during Deron's layup drill. And to actually compare Farmar's defense to Fisher, that's laughable. Fisher has been denying Deron from the easy drives, he's been making him change directions and staying in front of Deron for the majority of the game. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chicano Guest
|
Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 2:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| pound4pound1 wrote: |
| oh syet! we have a L4L sighting |
It's about time we had some sweet stats up in here again. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|