Combobreaker wrote:GCMD wrote:Combobreaker wrote:Pretty good analysis Sky. My opinion of Bynum is that no matter how clumsy he looks, he's so long that it's almost impossible for him to fail. It's like Yao. Even now, Yao still looks pretty clumsy, but, in the end, he's still 7'6 and 300 lbs. And one can argue that when healthy, Yao is right up there with the Del Harris Shaq(prime Shaq was just on another level, perhaps matched only by Hakeem in the past 20 years).
Now the biggest difference between Bynum and Yao is that Yao has a fadeaway, but a fadeaway isn't the only way to score. Bynum's weapon could be the traditional hook or even the skyhook. Let's just hope that he works hard enough that it comes sooner than later.
Bynum and Yao???
Can't be serious. Yao has been a pro for about 10 years...about 5 or 6 BEFORE he came to the NBA...
Bynum can't hold Yao's jock. I don't care how long or tall he is...
Yet Yao could only average 13 and 9 when he's 22. As far as not holding Yao's jock, you probably said the same thing about Yao back then when someone compared him to Shaq. If you didn't, it's only because nobody were bold enough to make such a comparison.
Are you serious???
Yao was one of the most anticipated players EVER to come into the league...Bynum was a blip in the radar...all potential, no substance....
Yao struggled his first year but was still one of the best centers in the league...
Bynum is still 2-3 years away from consistency as a starter...
There is no comparison.
Not saying that Bynum won't be great or that he's not ok now...but don't put him in the same sentence as Yao or Shaq...at least about NOW. Maybe in the future but it's not valid right now...

Follow Club Lakers on Twitter


