His D was pretty awful, maybe he needs time to adjust or maybe he's too slow. You were right though, what you said kept popping into my head when he was out there, he ALWAYS goes under the screen. Even when the screen is like 5 feet behind him and not even in the play he'll make a point to run around it and go behind. I couldn't even count how many open 3's this left Baron or whoever he was guarding with. I guess instead of Smush's not trying we'll have to deal with Fisher's trying, but still sucking on defense this year.Stearnfxr wrote:I'm almost positive that spin move and pass to Bynum was by Critter, not Farmar.
Weezy wrote:I thought you were gonna lay into Fisher way more than that.
gcclaker wrote:Sky,
Sasha put on weight? I couldn't tell... Or were you just confused by the amount of hair he had? OK...seriously. Yes, he is a pest but still gets beat off the dribble. I'm still in shock that he drove to the basket, drew a foul sending him to the charity stripe. Let's see him keep that up...
Fisher went underneath the screen where Troy Hudson hit the trey in the third. I thought to myself...hmmm, wonder what Sky is thinking at that point.
Looking forward to your blogs... Should be incisive with a healthy dose of humor.
Sky wrote:Coby, alabaster white in Hawaii? Hit the sand. My eyes hurt.
Combobreaker wrote:Pretty good analysis Sky. My opinion of Bynum is that no matter how clumsy he looks, he's so long that it's almost impossible for him to fail. It's like Yao. Even now, Yao still looks pretty clumsy, but, in the end, he's still 7'6 and 300 lbs. And one can argue that when healthy, Yao is right up there with the Del Harris Shaq(prime Shaq was just on another level, perhaps matched only by Hakeem in the past 20 years).
Now the biggest difference between Bynum and Yao is that Yao has a fadeaway, but a fadeaway isn't the only way to score. Bynum's weapon could be the traditional hook or even the skyhook. Let's just hope that he works hard enough that it comes sooner than later.


GCMD wrote:Combobreaker wrote:Pretty good analysis Sky. My opinion of Bynum is that no matter how clumsy he looks, he's so long that it's almost impossible for him to fail. It's like Yao. Even now, Yao still looks pretty clumsy, but, in the end, he's still 7'6 and 300 lbs. And one can argue that when healthy, Yao is right up there with the Del Harris Shaq(prime Shaq was just on another level, perhaps matched only by Hakeem in the past 20 years).
Now the biggest difference between Bynum and Yao is that Yao has a fadeaway, but a fadeaway isn't the only way to score. Bynum's weapon could be the traditional hook or even the skyhook. Let's just hope that he works hard enough that it comes sooner than later.
Bynum and Yao???
Can't be serious. Yao has been a pro for about 10 years...about 5 or 6 BEFORE he came to the NBA...
Bynum can't hold Yao's jock. I don't care how long or tall he is...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests