Antawn Jamison Discussion: Cockroach

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby Lakerjones on Wed Oct 31, 2012 8:53 am

khmrP wrote:
XXIV wrote:
Lakerjones wrote:I think Jamison will be fine as long as Mike Brown plays him correctly. I don't think he should be spending much time at the 3.


So then Jamison won't be fine?

:man10:


:man10: :bow:

Basically, yeah. He's going to be another Brown casualty at this point if he continues to play him out of position. Too bad. He actually played pretty decently last night for the most part on offense. He needs to backup at the 4 though, please. Before the preseason started I thought he might be able to play some at the 3, but I think he can't keep up on the defensive end at that position at all any more. Better to create a mismatch on the other end as he's still pretty quick for a 4.
Lakerjones
CL Global Moderator
 
Posts: 15212
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 12:37 am

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby therealdeal on Wed Oct 31, 2012 9:24 am

He looked good in flashes, but he wasn't what we needed from him. I feel like he's handcuffing himself just as much as Brown is, so that's not an excuse.

He has to be aggressive. And of course he has to get touches. I don't remember seeing him with the ball very often last night.
Stu : "Yeah, that's an old fashioned whoopin'."
therealdeal
CL Global Moderator
 
Posts: 40322
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 3:03 pm

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby artuditu on Wed Oct 31, 2012 12:01 pm

Should play mostly at the 4, and only occasionally at the 3.

He is the evidence that Brown is doing awful rotation, Brown wanted the big 4 playing together, with no place for Jamison at the 4. And then playing almost the whole second unit for garbage time.

The key for rotations should be combining 2-3 of the big 4 with 2-3 of the second unit. That way you can take the best from Kobe and Nash, and give enough rest to Gasol.
User avatar
artuditu

 
Posts: 428
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 8:51 am

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby Ariza3 on Wed Oct 31, 2012 2:56 pm

only reason why he's playing 3 and not 4 is bc mb wants starters in with the bench and in order to have Jordan hill and either Pau or Dwight, Jamison would have to play the 3 and Ebanks gets shafted. so I think that if Nash and Kobe are in with Ebanks Jamison and Hill at the 3,4,5 than I think they'd be Okay. Blake Meeks Jamison Hill and Dwight is also a good unit but doesn't utilize Jamison as much but it did work last night. Blake got 6 assists...that's more than Nash and Blake's playing with the bench. that shows how little nah handles the ball. with the 2nd unit Blake has the ball all the time. that's what Nash needs.
Image
User avatar
Ariza3

 
Posts: 4711
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2012 9:28 pm

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby karacha on Wed Oct 31, 2012 4:47 pm

If we have Dwight in the game, why not play Jamison as a stretch 4? This is what Dwight needs, and what Jamison prefers to play anyway. You can have Nash/Meeks/Ebanks/Jamison/Dwight. Shooters, slasher, post player. Or Blake/Kobe/Ebanks/Jamison/Pau (or Dwight or Hill). You have everything this way: shooting, passing, slashing, finishing and Jamison finally gets green light to chuck shots if Kobe can't for some reason (players like Blake and Pau certainly won't complain about him shooting it). Is this really that complicated? :man3:
"It's not realistic to get younger and better when you only have the veteran's minimum to offer free agents." :mhihi:

-Troll Kupchak
User avatar
karacha
CL Global Moderator
 
Posts: 37447
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 3:20 pm

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby JLaker17 on Wed Oct 31, 2012 4:48 pm

karacha wrote:Is this really that complicated? :man3:


We are talking Mike Brown here...
Image
User avatar
JLaker17

 
Posts: 1316
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 9:15 pm

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby borri on Wed Oct 31, 2012 5:44 pm

karacha wrote:If we have Dwight in the game, why not play Jamison as a stretch 4? This is what Dwight needs, and what Jamison prefers to play anyway. You can have Nash/Meeks/Ebanks/Jamison/Dwight. Shooters, slasher, post player. Or Blake/Kobe/Ebanks/Jamison/Pau (or Dwight or Hill). You have everything this way: shooting, passing, slashing, finishing and Jamison finally gets green light to chuck shots if Kobe can't for some reason (players like Blake and Pau certainly won't complain about him shooting it). Is this really that complicated? :man3:


hell no it's not complicated. Potato head is clueless. I don't think there can any other excuse out there.
User avatar
borri

 
Posts: 8035
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 5:16 pm

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby lotus on Wed Oct 31, 2012 6:11 pm

karacha wrote:If we have Dwight in the game, why not play Jamison as a stretch 4? This is what Dwight needs, and what Jamison prefers to play anyway. You can have Nash/Meeks/Ebanks/Jamison/Dwight. Shooters, slasher, post player. Or Blake/Kobe/Ebanks/Jamison/Pau (or Dwight or Hill). You have everything this way: shooting, passing, slashing, finishing and Jamison finally gets green light to chuck shots if Kobe can't for some reason (players like Blake and Pau certainly won't complain about him shooting it). Is this really that complicated? :man3:

Uh, you left Metta out of these rotations. He has to have the ball 7-10 seconds on each offensive possession to dribble then chuck up a shot. He's the team chucker, not Jamison. At least that's how its been playing out so far.
lotus

 
Posts: 1890
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 8:15 am

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby kobezaballa on Wed Oct 31, 2012 9:46 pm

this dude is washed up garbage
kobezaballa

 
Posts: 359
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 1:24 pm

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby v1n5anity on Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:21 pm

Jamison: 0-2 FG, 0-2 3pt, 2-2 ft, 2 pts, 1 reb, 0 ast, 0 stl, 0 blk

Harden: 14-25 FG, 4-10 3pt, 5-6 ft, 37 pts, 12 ast, 6 reb, 4 stl, 1 blk
User avatar
v1n5anity

 
Posts: 508
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2011 9:33 pm

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby Weezy on Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:24 pm

What the hell happened to this guy? He's a ghost right now, absolutely invisible out there, doesn't even look like he WANTS to be involved.
User avatar
Weezy
CL Global Moderator
 
Posts: 50866
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 11:14 am
Location: Anaheim, CA

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby karacha on Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:25 pm

What kind of comparison is that?! :man3:
"It's not realistic to get younger and better when you only have the veteran's minimum to offer free agents." :mhihi:

-Troll Kupchak
User avatar
karacha
CL Global Moderator
 
Posts: 37447
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 3:20 pm

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby Texas Lakers Fan on Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:26 pm

V1n5anity wrote:Jamison: 0-2 FG, 0-2 3pt, 2-2 ft, 2 pts, 1 reb, 0 ast, 0 stl, 0 blk

Harden: 14-25 FG, 4-10 3pt, 5-6 ft, 37 pts, 12 ast, 6 reb, 4 stl, 1 blk

Comparing a starter to a bench player. Great job showing your retardation again.
Image
User avatar
Texas Lakers Fan

 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 2:26 am

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby Texas Lakers Fan on Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:27 pm

karacha wrote:What kind of comparison is that?! :man3:


A ridiculous one, but are you really surprised?
Image
User avatar
Texas Lakers Fan

 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 2:26 am

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby Doc Brown on Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:28 pm

Texas Lakers Fan wrote:
V1n5anity wrote:Jamison: 0-2 FG, 0-2 3pt, 2-2 ft, 2 pts, 1 reb, 0 ast, 0 stl, 0 blk

Harden: 14-25 FG, 4-10 3pt, 5-6 ft, 37 pts, 12 ast, 6 reb, 4 stl, 1 blk

Comparing a starter to a bench player. Great job showing your retardation again.


Dude you were the one that compared the two of them and said Jamison would match Harden.
Rule of Thumb at ClubLakers - Never encourage people to check your post history.
User avatar
Doc Brown

 
Posts: 19446
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 10:11 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby Weezy on Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:28 pm

Texas Lakers Fan wrote:
V1n5anity wrote:Jamison: 0-2 FG, 0-2 3pt, 2-2 ft, 2 pts, 1 reb, 0 ast, 0 stl, 0 blk

Harden: 14-25 FG, 4-10 3pt, 5-6 ft, 37 pts, 12 ast, 6 reb, 4 stl, 1 blk

Comparing a starter to a bench player. Great job showing your mental retardation again.


That's a personal attack and it's not allowed here. You want to argue keep it civil, if you can't refrain from name calling you will be warned for it.
User avatar
Weezy
CL Global Moderator
 
Posts: 50866
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 11:14 am
Location: Anaheim, CA

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby shoe on Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:28 pm

V1n5anity wrote:Jamison: 0-2 FG, 0-2 3pt, 2-2 ft, 2 pts, 1 reb, 0 ast, 0 stl, 0 blk

Harden: 14-25 FG, 4-10 3pt, 5-6 ft, 37 pts, 12 ast, 6 reb, 4 stl, 1 blk


Randomest Comparison Ever :man3:
Image
User avatar
shoe

 
Posts: 5884
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 1:53 pm
Location: Buffalo, New York

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby Texas Lakers Fan on Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:29 pm

Doc Brown wrote:
Texas Lakers Fan wrote:
V1n5anity wrote:Jamison: 0-2 FG, 0-2 3pt, 2-2 ft, 2 pts, 1 reb, 0 ast, 0 stl, 0 blk

Harden: 14-25 FG, 4-10 3pt, 5-6 ft, 37 pts, 12 ast, 6 reb, 4 stl, 1 blk

Comparing a starter to a bench player. Great job showing your retardation again.


Dude you were the one that compared the two of them and said Jamison would match Harden.

Ugh I never said Jamison was as good as a Harden I said last year that he matched Harden points wise that's it. That's all I said, but this a** clown is comparing a Harden who is now starting to Jamison who is a reserve.
Image
User avatar
Texas Lakers Fan

 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 2:26 am

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby streamline on Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:29 pm

karacha wrote:What kind of comparison is that?! :man3:

:man10: made me laugh...at least it helps the pain go away for a min....lol
streamline

 
Posts: 275
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 9:02 pm

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby OX1947 on Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:34 pm

Texas Lakers Fan wrote:
Doc Brown wrote:
Texas Lakers Fan wrote:
V1n5anity wrote:Jamison: 0-2 FG, 0-2 3pt, 2-2 ft, 2 pts, 1 reb, 0 ast, 0 stl, 0 blk

Harden: 14-25 FG, 4-10 3pt, 5-6 ft, 37 pts, 12 ast, 6 reb, 4 stl, 1 blk

Comparing a starter to a bench player. Great job showing your retardation again.


Dude you were the one that compared the two of them and said Jamison would match Harden.

Ugh I never said Jamison was as good as a Harden I said last year that he matched Harden points wise that's it. That's all I said, but this a** clown is comparing a Harden who is now starting to Jamison who is a reserve.


Look man, you are talking about a 23 year old superstar who is about to hit his prime to a guy who is going to be retiring at the end of the year. harden and jamison shouldnt even be in the same country right now no matter how much they scored last year. The only reason why Harden wasnt starting in OKC was because they had westbrook, not because he wasnt a starter. Harden has been holding his game back since he went to OKC. As you saw tonight, harden will be a mega star for the next decade. Just sayin...
OX1947

 
Posts: 1871
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 12:48 am

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby v1n5anity on Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:36 pm

karacha wrote:What kind of comparison is that?! :man3:


My bad! I guess I should have been more clear. It was a poke at Texas Lakers Fan because he compared the two a few weeks back (when Harden was still on OKC) and said that Jamison could match Harden production wise.

lakers-discussion/espn-predicts-nba-champion-lakers-get-votes-t135634-25.html#p3704353
Last edited by v1n5anity on Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
v1n5anity

 
Posts: 508
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2011 9:33 pm

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby v1n5anity on Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:37 pm

Texas Lakers Fan wrote:
Doc Brown wrote:
Texas Lakers Fan wrote:
V1n5anity wrote:Jamison: 0-2 FG, 0-2 3pt, 2-2 ft, 2 pts, 1 reb, 0 ast, 0 stl, 0 blk

Harden: 14-25 FG, 4-10 3pt, 5-6 ft, 37 pts, 12 ast, 6 reb, 4 stl, 1 blk

Comparing a starter to a bench player. Great job showing your retardation again.


Dude you were the one that compared the two of them and said Jamison would match Harden.

Ugh I never said Jamison was as good as a Harden I said last year that he matched Harden points wise that's it. That's all I said, but this a** clown is comparing a Harden who is now starting to Jamison who is a reserve.


You said "production wise", but even if we're talking about points wise...

edit: you weren't talking about last season, you were talking for this upcoming season.
Last edited by v1n5anity on Wed Oct 31, 2012 11:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
v1n5anity

 
Posts: 508
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2011 9:33 pm

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby v1n5anity on Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:38 pm

Texas Lakers Fan wrote:
V1n5anity wrote:Jamison: 0-2 FG, 0-2 3pt, 2-2 ft, 2 pts, 1 reb, 0 ast, 0 stl, 0 blk

Harden: 14-25 FG, 4-10 3pt, 5-6 ft, 37 pts, 12 ast, 6 reb, 4 stl, 1 blk

Comparing a starter to a bench player. Great job showing your retardation again.


Texas Lakers Fan wrote:
karacha wrote:What kind of comparison is that?! :man3:


A ridiculous one, but are you really surprised?


Lol dude are you kidding me?

some gold:

Texas Lakers Fan wrote:I'd argue our bench is as good if not better than OKC or Miami. Think about it who does Miami or OKC have on their bench that can hurt you consistently? Miami has Ray Allen, Udonis Haslem, and Norris Cole. OKC has James Harden and Nick Collison. We have Jamison who can match Allen and Harden production wise and we also have guys like Meeks who is a very solid shooter and Hill who's a solid defender, rebounder, and hustle player. Not to mention we have the best starting unit in the league by a mile therefore we don't really need great bench production.


Texas Lakers Fan wrote:Jamison averaged 17 & 6 last season. He's been a near 20 ppg scorer. Therefore he clearly can match Harden as far as points scored
User avatar
v1n5anity

 
Posts: 508
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2011 9:33 pm

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby v1n5anity on Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:39 pm

Doc Brown wrote:
Texas Lakers Fan wrote:
V1n5anity wrote:Jamison: 0-2 FG, 0-2 3pt, 2-2 ft, 2 pts, 1 reb, 0 ast, 0 stl, 0 blk

Harden: 14-25 FG, 4-10 3pt, 5-6 ft, 37 pts, 12 ast, 6 reb, 4 stl, 1 blk

Comparing a starter to a bench player. Great job showing your retardation again.


Dude you were the one that compared the two of them and said Jamison would match Harden.


KeepFlipFlopping at it again...
User avatar
v1n5anity

 
Posts: 508
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2011 9:33 pm

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby lakersyunowin on Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:46 pm

lawl
the artist formerly known as fklukewalton, fksteveblake, and fkmikebrown
User avatar
lakersyunowin

 
Posts: 10415
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 7:19 pm

PreviousNext

Return to NBA Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 12 guests

cron
Advertise Here | Privacy Policy | ©2008 Sculu Sports. Come Strong.