Antawn Jamison Discussion: Cockroach

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby JGC on Wed Oct 31, 2012 11:00 pm

V1n5anity wrote:
Doc Brown wrote:
Texas Lakers Fan wrote:
V1n5anity wrote:Jamison: 0-2 FG, 0-2 3pt, 2-2 ft, 2 pts, 1 reb, 0 ast, 0 stl, 0 blk

Harden: 14-25 FG, 4-10 3pt, 5-6 ft, 37 pts, 12 ast, 6 reb, 4 stl, 1 blk

Comparing a starter to a bench player. Great job showing your retardation again.


Dude you were the one that compared the two of them and said Jamison would match Harden.


KeepFlipFlopping at it again...


Ouch. V1n5anity, I don't often agree with many of your posts, but that was hilarious. Nice work.
JGC

 
Posts: 3781
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 9:07 am

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby v1n5anity on Wed Oct 31, 2012 11:15 pm

JGC wrote:
V1n5anity wrote:
Doc Brown wrote:
Texas Lakers Fan wrote:
V1n5anity wrote:Jamison: 0-2 FG, 0-2 3pt, 2-2 ft, 2 pts, 1 reb, 0 ast, 0 stl, 0 blk

Harden: 14-25 FG, 4-10 3pt, 5-6 ft, 37 pts, 12 ast, 6 reb, 4 stl, 1 blk

Comparing a starter to a bench player. Great job showing your retardation again.


Dude you were the one that compared the two of them and said Jamison would match Harden.


KeepFlipFlopping at it again...


Ouch. V1n5anity, I don't often agree with many of your posts, but that was hilarious. Nice work.


:man10: thanks

and the reason you don't agree with my posts is because I mostly only post when I disagree with something that is usually popular opinion. Like when I said Dwight is better than Kobe. I mean I can come on here and say things like "damn, Kobe is playing very efficiently", and I'm sure you'd start agreeing with more of my posts lol. But what's the point of a forum anyway, if everyone is agreeing? :man12:

I suppose that's why you disagree with most of my posts. At least that's my best guess lol.
User avatar
v1n5anity

 
Posts: 508
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2011 9:33 pm

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby kray28 on Wed Oct 31, 2012 11:30 pm

Jamison should be benched. He's basically done.
Image
User avatar
kray28

 
Posts: 21241
Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 8:16 pm
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby v1n5anity on Wed Oct 31, 2012 11:32 pm

I still think Jamison can be effective, but he needs to play the 4.

Nash
Meeks
Metta
Jamison
Dwight

something like that should make him more effective.
User avatar
v1n5anity

 
Posts: 508
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2011 9:33 pm

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby BDG on Wed Oct 31, 2012 11:33 pm

My question is -- are we even looking to get him involved in the game?

When have we run a play for him? When have we even given it to him to go iso?

How is he supposed to get into a rhythm when he only plays in 6 minute stretches and isn't getting touches?

Jamison is supposed to create mismatches because he's a stretch 4. If you don't even play him at that position then just don't bother playing him at all. There's no point.
Image
Slava laughed at the suggestion his skills might be affected by the down time. "Are you kidding?" he said. "Basketball is like ball. It's all a circle."

BEST VIDEO EVER ... AND AND THE SECOND BEST.
User avatar
BDG
Retired Admin
 
Posts: 40952
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 10:45 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby therealdeal on Thu Nov 01, 2012 9:07 am

^ That.

I haven't seen us give him a chance to do his thing. Not once. It's as much a waste as having Hill on the bench right now. Give the man a damn chance.
Stu : "Yeah, that's an old fashioned whoopin'."
therealdeal
CL Global Moderator
 
Posts: 40322
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 3:03 pm

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby Kit on Thu Nov 01, 2012 10:03 am

Jamison needs to post up and little more and create for our shooters. But Mike Brown is too busy doing nothing else.
Kit

 
Posts: 1755
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:26 pm

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby escobar8 on Thu Nov 01, 2012 10:13 am

I wouldnt mind having him start and giving gasol manu type bench player role...
User avatar
escobar8

 
Posts: 9768
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 11:35 am
Location: Croatia

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby kray28 on Thu Nov 01, 2012 10:27 am

Jamison is just stealing minutes from a better player sitting on the bench.
Image
User avatar
kray28

 
Posts: 21241
Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 8:16 pm
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby DJ-RaZ-Q#24 on Thu Nov 01, 2012 10:29 am

kray28 wrote:Jamison is just stealing minutes from a better player sitting on the bench.



Who's that guy?!
User avatar
DJ-RaZ-Q#24

 
Posts: 1925
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 5:52 am
Location: Stuttgart, Germany

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby kray28 on Thu Nov 01, 2012 10:32 am

DJ-RaZ-Q#24 wrote:
kray28 wrote:Jamison is just stealing minutes from a better player sitting on the bench.



Who's that guy?!


When he's playing at the 3, it would be Ebanks.

When he's playing at the 4, it would be either Hill or Sacre. Yes, both are better than Jamison.
Image
User avatar
kray28

 
Posts: 21241
Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 8:16 pm
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby XXIV on Thu Nov 01, 2012 12:08 pm

^ Sacre at the 4 is just laughable. He would get torched.
XXIV

 
Posts: 6386
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2010 11:20 am
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby therealdeal on Thu Nov 01, 2012 12:37 pm

Jamison is better than both Ebanks and Hill.

He's not asserting himself out there. That's the problem. Not his talent level.

And yes, Sacre at the 4 is an awful, awful idea.
Stu : "Yeah, that's an old fashioned whoopin'."
therealdeal
CL Global Moderator
 
Posts: 40322
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 3:03 pm

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby SK8 on Thu Nov 01, 2012 12:43 pm

I don't blame Jamison at all. He is not the only one who have no idea what is happening in the game.
The second place means you're the first loser
ex Uncle Drew
User avatar
SK8

 
Posts: 1507
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 11:26 am

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby karacha on Thu Nov 01, 2012 12:48 pm

Again, Jamison needs to play the 4, stretch the floor for Dwight, let Pau rest, and he needs "green light" to shoot the ball. He can even create his own shot. Although it looks goofy, it usually works.
"It's not realistic to get younger and better when you only have the veteran's minimum to offer free agents." :mhihi:

-Troll Kupchak
User avatar
karacha
CL Global Moderator
 
Posts: 37447
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 3:20 pm

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby kenzo on Thu Nov 01, 2012 12:49 pm

How can he not be? Honest question.
User avatar
kenzo

 
Posts: 5970
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 4:06 pm
Location: Poland

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling or Lost in Shuffle?

Postby Finwë on Thu Nov 01, 2012 6:39 pm

I agree with the first couple of posts, it's not like he was put in positions to succeed and fell short.
Brown's inconsistent rotations + a complex offense that hasn't yet been really picked up + playing with 3-4 other bench players who can't create and don't really draw defensive attention + not having plays called for him = really difficult to produce.

Having said that, I do worry a bit about Jamison, but on the defensive end. It's been said before and I think it's true: he's too slow to guard 3s and many times too light/small to guard 4s.
But we all knew this, and hoped that he'd compensate it with offensive production -> which is why it's increasingly important to put him in positions to succeed and help the team (That's mostly on you, Brown.)
"The first time I ever saw my uniform hanging in the locker I put it on right away, and it just felt like I was putting on golden armour. From that day forward, I just called it 'the golden armour', it just felt like there was something mystical and magical about it" - Kobe Bryant.
User avatar
Finwë

 
Posts: 8078
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 4:32 pm

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby Finwë on Thu Nov 01, 2012 6:41 pm

lakerswiz wrote:Eh, I've seen him get the ball plenty. He just sucks to be honest.

He had Jarred Jeffries on him last night. I could have scored on Jeffries every time down the floor.

Nothing, not one play, from Jamison has shown me that he'll be the factor off the bench that we thought he would.

Isn't Jeffries supposed to be a good defensive player though? I know he's not a good offensive player (lol), and I always thought the reason he got minutes was he hustled and played D.
"The first time I ever saw my uniform hanging in the locker I put it on right away, and it just felt like I was putting on golden armour. From that day forward, I just called it 'the golden armour', it just felt like there was something mystical and magical about it" - Kobe Bryant.
User avatar
Finwë

 
Posts: 8078
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 4:32 pm

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby kray28 on Thu Nov 01, 2012 6:48 pm

therealdeal wrote:Jamison is better than both Ebanks and Hill.

He's not asserting himself out there. That's the problem. Not his talent level.

And yes, Sacre at the 4 is an awful, awful idea.


He's tougher physically and a better defender than Jamison, and he has a better mid range shot than HIll. Why would he not work at the four?
Image
User avatar
kray28

 
Posts: 21241
Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 8:16 pm
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling or Lost in Shuffle?

Postby Phil XI on Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:40 pm

He's just lost in Princeton. UNC isn't really known for the brightest bulbs in the light store.
Get 17!!
User avatar
Phil XI

 
Posts: 1680
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 11:23 pm
Location: Thanks Ron for Gm7! You'll always be a Laker Legend!

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling

Postby therealdeal on Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:46 pm

kray28 wrote:
therealdeal wrote:Jamison is better than both Ebanks and Hill.

He's not asserting himself out there. That's the problem. Not his talent level.

And yes, Sacre at the 4 is an awful, awful idea.


He's tougher physically and a better defender than Jamison, and he has a better mid range shot than HIll. Why would he not work at the four?

Because he's insanely slow. We've seen Pau get blown by because he's not quick enough. I like Sacre a lot, but quick is not how I would describe him.
Stu : "Yeah, that's an old fashioned whoopin'."
therealdeal
CL Global Moderator
 
Posts: 40322
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 3:03 pm

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling or Lost in Shuffle?

Postby JoelMyersScrotalSack on Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:53 pm

If Jamison could be a true stretch 4 and knock down 3s at a high percentage he would actually be kind of useful. The problem is that he can't contribute anything offensively right now and is so bad defensively that he's a complete net negative out there. I said this guy was garbage before we even signed him, but thankfully they didn't overpay him even though some people here actually thought he was worth more than the vet min
User avatar
JoelMyersScrotalSack

 
Posts: 6778
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 2:10 am

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling or Lost in Shuffle?

Postby dj vitus on Thu Nov 01, 2012 10:50 pm

I liked what I saw in Jamison the last game. He actually went for rebounds and loose balls. Hopefully he can get that 3 point stroke back, because they all seemed kinda flat.
"Why are they blocking out all the good stuff? They let Sarah Jessica Parker's face on TV and she looks like a foot!!"
User avatar
dj vitus

 
Posts: 9480
Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Walnut, CA by way of Laaaas Vegas!

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling or Lost in Shuffle?

Postby The Rock on Thu Nov 01, 2012 10:55 pm

If its not working for him at the 3 why not put him at the 4? Is Brown that inflexible?
Image

Props to sidthekid871
User avatar
The Rock
CL Twitter Team
 
Posts: 19991
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 11:10 pm
Location: Smackdown Hotel

Re: Antawn Jamison Discussion: Struggling or Lost in Shuffle?

Postby vtandon on Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:31 pm

The 3 spot is the biggest (and probably only, at this point) issue I have against MB right now. The bench isn't full of scrubs who can't produce. Apart from Ebanks, they're all proven at their position. C'mon now..
User avatar
vtandon

 
Posts: 619
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 11:50 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

PreviousNext

Return to NBA Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 12 guests

cron
Advertise Here | Privacy Policy | ©2008 Sculu Sports. Come Strong.