Lakerjones wrote:I don't get this at all, unless as mentioned by some that Mitch is planning on some moves. Otherwise it makes zero sense. Even more, why the hell didn't we cut Ebanks?
Got to be a move in the works, no matter what Shelbourne was told. I know I'm contradicting myself with her earlier reports with the Dwight/Kobe situation, but when it comes to Mitch there's always a plan.
I've got to believe this means we're looking to trade someone. We might not be signing someone (although Kenyon would be nice right about now), but I think this has to mean a trade.
What I don't get is why we didn't try to at least trade the kid for a draft pick or something...