khmrP wrote:Horford DOESN"T make MAX and he would be playing his natural position @ PF when/if Pau returns and teagues>>>>>>>>Brooks. No one includes picks but BK has no picks to give anyways now, so again Lopez/Brooks and 3 1st rd picks couldn't get it done and yet you're willing to consider it now without picks?
humphries was included in that deal back then as well. And why are you using that as a standard as a "bad deal"? Lol everyone knows now that orlando were idiots in the what they got in return. They're hardly the standard for good deal making. The whole hroford doesn't make max would make sense if you had someone else you included as a reason why to reduce talent for less money, and another star. But from what I see, your not. And no question teague is currently better than brooks. But Lopez is an all star. We're DEFINITELY "going to be a lottery team" for years to come if we go with horford and that deal. Lol, if lopez can't do it, horford sure can't carry us to the playoffs. But if we get a young superstar pg, they can be a good duo. Also, you like the horford and gasol lineup, but don't see the potential of Brook and gasol? Lol I don't get that logic.