therealdeal wrote:Something that I'm not excited about... where's his athleticism? When we first drafted him he was jumping out of the gym and that was half of why he was compared to Ariza here. I haven't seen that from him and I'd like to.
Weezy wrote:Ya I think it was on the break, he has out in the open hops and offensive rebounding ability, but when dribbling and in traffic he doesn't look so athletic he looks more awkward.
Rooscooter wrote:therealdeal wrote:Something that I'm not excited about... where's his athleticism? When we first drafted him he was jumping out of the gym and that was half of why he was compared to Ariza here. I haven't seen that from him and I'd like to.
I never though he was that athletic to start with.... he's young and has some athleticism but he's never been quick laterally and with the ball he's been pretty slow actually. I remember last year when Cousins was d'ing him up on the perimeter and he couldn't dribble around him..... in fact he dribbled into the corner and then turned it over..... that particular play sticks with me because of just what you said..... he'd really not that fast or quick it seems when you compare him to others on the floor.
His shot looks better..... and that's a good thing. His defense wasn't so hot but we need him to shoot more than defense anyway.
therealdeal wrote:Rooscooter wrote:therealdeal wrote:Something that I'm not excited about... where's his athleticism? When we first drafted him he was jumping out of the gym and that was half of why he was compared to Ariza here. I haven't seen that from him and I'd like to.
I never though he was that athletic to start with.... he's young and has some athleticism but he's never been quick laterally and with the ball he's been pretty slow actually. I remember last year when Cousins was d'ing him up on the perimeter and he couldn't dribble around him..... in fact he dribbled into the corner and then turned it over..... that particular play sticks with me because of just what you said..... he'd really not that fast or quick it seems when you compare him to others on the floor.
His shot looks better..... and that's a good thing. His defense wasn't so hot but we need him to shoot more than defense anyway.
Aw yeah look at this guy complimenting Ebanks. Get used to it Roos.

The Rock wrote:He sucks playing the 2. Just let him stay at the 3. Meeks is shooting well
Doc Brown wrote:The Rock wrote:He sucks playing the 2. Just let him stay at the 3. Meeks is shooting well
But that would give us an advantage though....Mike Brown doesn't roll like that.


therealdeal wrote:I already got the solution: Meeks/Ebanks/Jamison/Hill/Gasol or Howard
Just run the Princeton and we don't need a real PG, just like the triangle.

davriver290 wrote:He's going to be an interesting back up to metta. He's actually been pretty good
davriver290 wrote:He's going to be an interesting back up to metta. He's actually been pretty good
therealdeal wrote:I already got the solution: Meeks/Ebanks/Jamison/Hill/Gasol or Howard
Just run the Princeton and we don't need a real PG, just like the triangle.
therealdeal wrote:No.
Meeks is a decent ball handler though. Good enough that he could fill in for a couple weeks if say Blake and Duhon ran into each other and both fell on spike strips in the parking lot.

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 18 guests