Pig Miller wrote:Why Wouldn't Chicago just amnesty boozer? No reason to trade 2 picks just to b get him off the books. Your boozer scenario sounds really far fetched
Their owner is cheap & doesn't want to pay Boozer 15M to play somewhere else.. It's been reported that they will try hard to trade him..
While they might not be willing to part with both of those picks, they might include Gibson who they'll need to dump also. We might even be able to get 1 of the picks depending on the other offers they see.. We'd be taking on a TON of salary for them.. Boozer's 16.8M, 3 years of Taj at 3 yrs/25M..
I don't think Gibson has enough positive value to offset eating Boozer's contract. It would have to be a guy performing on their rookie contract like Butler if they don't want to give up any picks, & as others have stated, they aren't giving up Butler.