Jordan Hill Discussion: Back for 2 yr/$18 mil

Re: Jordan Hill Discussion: Back for 2 yr/$18 mil

Postby therealdeal on Sun Aug 17, 2014 9:11 am

halekulani wrote:wow no trade clause for a role player you're over paying?

bigger risk than i anticipated.

It's not a real no trade clause, but a function of the type of contract we gave him. Eric Pincus wrote about it, it's a little confusing for me.
Stu : "Yeah, that's an old fashioned whoopin'."
therealdeal
CL Global Moderator
 
Posts: 40357
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 3:03 pm

Re: Jordan Hill Discussion: Back for 2 yr/$18 mil

Postby lukewaltonsdad on Sun Aug 17, 2014 10:35 am

therealdeal wrote:
lukewaltonsdad wrote:
Davis are redundant ttttherealdeal wrote:Available cash is helpful the way we're trying to rebuild. If Hill earns a new contract, we can give him one. If he doesn't we can move on. Good for finding pieces to build around instead of giving a lot of guaranteed money to somebody we don't trust.

I think Davis could end up hurting Hill's chances of getting a huge paycheck. Davis might not have the same kind of motor as Hill, but he's a better shot blocker and still a proficient rebounder. Davis could end up being the bargain of the summer and could be the young guy we give a contract to.


Hill and Davis are redundant, IMO. I am betting that Jordan will be shopped this trade deadline just as he was last year when he was rumored to be going to Brooklyn. A contending team may need another productive Big; GS is a team that comes to mind. If

Who are you quoting? :man3: :man3:

Also, Hill's contract has a de facto no trade clause in it so we can't trade him without his permission. If he's shopped, he'll only go to the place he wants to go.


I was quoting you, bit I've been posting on my phone and at times, it has a mind of its own. On topic, I'm aware that Jordan would have to approve where he would go; more than likely, it would have to be a contender that would have a need for him and where Jordan still has an opportunity to receive minutes. I'm just pointing out the possibility of moving him which I think we will explore when he's eligible to trade, IMO.
lukewaltonsdad

 
Posts: 804
Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2013 9:14 am

Re: Jordan Hill Discussion: Back for 2 yr/$18 mil

Postby therealdeal on Sun Aug 17, 2014 11:00 am

I figured, I was just giving you a hard time. :man10:

I know we'll explore a trade when the time comes, I'm just not sure who it would be to. I don't think they'll move him unless it's for a stud and who would give us a stud for him?
Stu : "Yeah, that's an old fashioned whoopin'."
therealdeal
CL Global Moderator
 
Posts: 40357
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 3:03 pm

Re: Jordan Hill Discussion: Back for 2 yr/$18 mil

Postby Battle Tested20 on Wed Sep 24, 2014 10:32 pm

Jordan Hill Video Interview w/Scrimmage Highlights 9/24/14

http://www.nba.com/lakers/video/140924jordanhill1on1

Says he's been working on his 17 foot jumper and overall defensive intensity
Image
"I just put my faith in God. Through him we can do all things"
- Kobe Bryant, March 24, 2004
User avatar
Battle Tested20

 
Posts: 11705
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 11:39 pm
Location: San Diego, CA (SDSU)

Re: Jordan Hill Discussion: Back for 2 yr/$18 mil

Postby lakerfan2 on Wed Sep 24, 2014 10:34 pm

Well, he's going to be our anchor. The one thing he's got to do is stay out of foul trouble. His effort and nose for rebounding are excellent, but he's a little small to be an anchor. Still a decent shot blocker however.
#OURHOUSE
User avatar
lakerfan2

 
Posts: 9920
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 5:23 pm

Re: Jordan Hill Discussion: Back for 2 yr/$18 mil

Postby therealdeal on Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:59 am

It's going to be a good thing going from him to Davis at Center every night. They won't be the tallest guys, but they'll work harder than most and defend the rim nicely. They're both very good complements to Boozer and Randle. We're going to have a voracious rebounder on the floor at all times. Nice!
Stu : "Yeah, that's an old fashioned whoopin'."
therealdeal
CL Global Moderator
 
Posts: 40357
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 3:03 pm

Re: Jordan Hill Discussion: Back for 2 yr/$18 mil

Postby flawedandloved on Thu Sep 25, 2014 1:34 pm

scrappy underdogs we are, and if he can stay healthy, there are none better to play that role :jam2:
flawedandloved

 
Posts: 83
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2014 9:37 pm

Re: Jordan Hill Discussion: Back for 2 yr/$18 mil

Postby kidvideo on Fri Oct 03, 2014 10:11 am

Jordan Hill quits drinking to help Lakers win a title.

http://www.runthetriangle.com/dryhill/


Image
The L.W.O. will rise again...
User avatar
kidvideo

 
Posts: 296
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 10:42 pm

Re: Jordan Hill Discussion: Back for 2 yr/$18 mil

Postby lotus on Fri Oct 03, 2014 5:25 pm

lakerfan2 wrote:The one thing he's got to do is stay out of foul trouble.

This is the only thing I'm concerned about.
lotus

 
Posts: 1865
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 8:15 am

Re: Jordan Hill Discussion: Back for 2 yr/$18 mil

Postby JSM on Sat Oct 04, 2014 6:49 am

kidvideo wrote:Jordan Hill quits drinking to help Lakers win a title.

http://www.runthetriangle.com/dryhill/


Image

Without MDA here, alcohol consumption of Laker players and fans drops 28%
User avatar
JSM
ClubLakers.com Administrator
 
Posts: 94034
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2003 3:40 pm
Location: Atlanta

Re: Jordan Hill Discussion: Back for 2 yr/$18 mil

Postby LTLakerFan on Sat Oct 04, 2014 10:14 am

:man10: True
LTLakerFan

 
Posts: 6486
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 10:44 pm
Location: SoCal

Re: Jordan Hill Discussion: Back for 2 yr/$18 mil

Postby SFGOLDRUSHER on Fri Oct 17, 2014 2:42 pm

Liking hill more and more accepting of his salary after seeing some more of him. He always tends to be in the right spots&always gets several offensive rebounds,hustle plays&putbacks with his style. Solid.
User avatar
SFGOLDRUSHER

 
Posts: 75
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 4:28 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Previous

Return to Lakers Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 3 guests

cron
Advertise Here | Privacy Policy | ©2008 Sculu Sports. Come Strong.