therealdeal wrote:hollywood swinger wrote:therealdeal wrote:So because he's not a great player, you enjoy bashing him at the expense of others' opinions? That's ridiculous. Why would you even think to do that? Do you just like to annoy people? How are you different than someone who comes onto the site and bashes the Lakers, the team we collectively follow?
hey i give good players props but when i see a player not producing and not advancing their game yes i do bash them. i don't except mediocracy from players just because they are lakers. if you are a laker you still need to produce i'm not gonna just suck up to a players game because he plays for my favorite team.
He's producing nearly a double double in twenty minutes a game. Your analysis is wrong. Most posters here are showing you statistics that show Jordan Hill is producing just fine. You want to argue he's not great but no one says he is. We're saying he's a solid player that produces when given the opportunity.
okay so if it isn't a pro bias for jordan why do these same people keep saying get rid of pau when he is far more superior and producer than jordan? jordan would get more minutes if his game was more well rounded. he can't shoot and he isn't athletic. your rewarding him for the average things he does because of what he is so poor at. tell me what you think he should do better? how has his game changed since he got here or for that matter got in the league? how has he grown?