"JoelMyersScrotalSack"
LeBron is better than all those players you mentioned and has been the best player in the league for years now with no one really there to threaten him (again only Durant but I don't think he's better).
Hmm, arguable but thats not the point now is it. Being the "best" player doesn't mean championships. I made an example that you obviously missed when I listed a few players who are considered All Time Greats that don't have a single ring, not one, none, zip, zilch and nada. Kobe Bryant was considered the best in basketball for several years and got bounced two years in a row by the Suns. Point? Being the "best" doesn't mean winning.
The reason LeBron is going to win multiple rings is because he's the best player in the league and probably will be for the next 3-4 years.
That is awesome. Question. If Lebron James has been the best player in the league and was for the past few years as you stated..... How come he only has one ring? Was he letting others just win or did that time just not count? Maybe he was waiting to hit his prime which in NBA years is 27-32 as I hear it. Is that it, was Lebron waiting to hit his prime so that is why he got one ring finally?
Even when he's not the best player in the league he'll still have more opportunities to win championships.
Hmmm, you didn't say have a chance. Hell Gary Payton had many chances to win and finally got one on his very last chance. So are you saying the so-called Greatest to Ever Play the game LBJ is going to become a tailcoat rider to a Championship? Thats a pretty steep fall for GOAT don't you think?
I don't know what you find so ridiculous about this, the best player in the league almost always walks away with multiple championships and history has shown that. Kobe, Duncan, Shaq, Jordan, Hakeem, Magic, Bird, Kareem, Russell, etc.
You are right they all did and Lebron could very well get multiple rings. However, the point that you missed (again) is that one Championship let alone multiple is not a given. How is that hard to comprehend?
Why do you think LeBron will be the exception?
Here let me see:
1. Nothing is a given especially Championship oppertunities.
2. Injuries change a lot of things... Do the Lakers lose in 04 if Malone is healthy?
3. As great as Lebron is there are others as good (see your own statement about KD)
4. Other teams have a say in it.... Do the Heat win if Russel Westprick doesn't go full-retard in the Finals?
Also when you throw in blatantly false statements like this
and become the best to ever do it
Are you saying that the Heat will 4-peat? THat is nuts.
Well now this is interesting... I simply used what you said to form that opinion. Hell I don't even have to go to your original post to find where you implied he is the greatest and going to pass everyone not named MJ as a given to show you. Hmm, where shall I go? I know lets look at this statement:
The reason LeBron is going to win multiple rings is because he's the best player in the league and probably will be for the next 3-4 years.
Ahh yes, there that one will work. You see where you say he is the best player and will be for the next 3-4 years? Well, that implies that being the best will get him the rings. Since you alread said he will win mulitiples as if its a given but his window, again according to you is 3-4 years, then it must mean that Miami Heat will in fact 4-peat. You said it. Or is it my insecurites. eh.
Where did I say any of this? It's like you let your insecurity dictate your posts whenever LeBron's greatness is brought up that non sense like this just comes out.
Speaking of insecurities... It looks like my inability to, as boss said in Shawshank Redemtion, swallow whats put in my mouth has gotten the best of me again. Obviously, I was so insecure that I attacked your post with a bunch of emoticons and name calling with no real content. Oh wait, I did give you content. Pointed out the over statements of your post that you stated as "facts" which cannot be proven or supported. You call it insecurities and logical people call it wiping the crap off the bottom of my shoe. You don't want me to call your post for what it is then don't leave it on the ground for me to step on. I rather be insecure and right than have false insecurities making wild statements that can't be supported. But thats just me.