puffyusaf#2 wrote:The last two plays where we Iso'd Kobe was my only complaint. I don't care if we run the Iso but no one moved and Kobe turned it over in critical time. Made up for it with 9/9 from the line though. Great game overall.
Helljumper wrote:puffyusaf#2 wrote:Mark should go to the Charles Barkley school of please STFU talking about the Lakers. Shouldn't he be fined for talking about another player under contract on another team?
Just noticed this update on the RealGM article:Update: Mike Bresnahan of the Los Angeles Times reports that the Lakers will not file a complaint against Cuban for his comments. The NBA, however, is reviewing the matter and can fine him for publicly speaking about the status of another team's player.

Weezy wrote:That was fun to see, I like what Kobe has been doing to win, but once in a while vintage Kobe scoring is fun.

JGC wrote:puffyusaf#2 wrote:^damn you defend anything that isn't a Laker.
Inhale. Then exhale. (Not the other way around).
Ok, now ... I never defended anything. I just didn't see anything in there from Cuban where he suggested that the Lakers should amnesty Kobe. He never actually said that, did he? (I mean, maybe he did but he wasn't quoted as such in the article).
I mean, I thought we didn't like it when the media blows things out of proportion. We just went through this. I was just pointing out how the media blew his comments out of proportion with the article title (I'm sure for the same selfish reasons they blow the Kobe/Dwight thing out of proportion).
I don't even understand your comment really. Do you blindly defend everything that is Laker? I don't think you do, do you?




noobiew wrote:40/7/4 tonight, not bad for a 34 yrs old rite



Jazzygirl205 wrote:noobiew wrote:40/7/4 tonight, not bad for a 34 yrs old rite
Charles Barkley has something to say
Melo >>> Kobe... right 
odom1year wrote:Have to give Kobe props for attacking the rim more.

puffyusaf#2 wrote:JGC wrote:puffyusaf#2 wrote:^damn you defend anything that isn't a Laker.
Inhale. Then exhale. (Not the other way around).
Ok, now ... I never defended anything. I just didn't see anything in there from Cuban where he suggested that the Lakers should amnesty Kobe. He never actually said that, did he? (I mean, maybe he did but he wasn't quoted as such in the article).
I mean, I thought we didn't like it when the media blows things out of proportion. We just went through this. I was just pointing out how the media blew his comments out of proportion with the article title (I'm sure for the same selfish reasons they blow the Kobe/Dwight thing out of proportion).
I don't even understand your comment really. Do you blindly defend everything that is Laker? I don't think you do, do you?
LOL.. You are comedy. Inhale. Exhale. You should try it yourself.
Like I said, Damn you defend anything that is against LA. It wasn't a guess it was an observation. I know it is true because you came with your "inhale. exhale" quip. Typical.
Maybe had you said it might be blown out of proportion. You jumped in saying the title was rediculous and Mark never said Amnesty Kobe. Guess the League Office also is blowing it out of proportion too by looking into it to fine him. I know its hard to understand but an owner can not talk about a player who is under contract for another team.
I don't blindly defend anything. It just seems I am always defending cause a few of you only find ways to knock the team at every chance. I am sure you have issue with Kobe shooting 23 times tonight.
noobiew wrote:40/7/4 tonight, not bad for a 34 yrs old rite
Excellent game nonetheless.

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], Kobe8Fan, Sean and 24 guests