JGC wrote:Well, whether he is incapable of it or not is obviously your opinion.
How?? Where in this season has Dwight shown he's capable of carrying the scoring load?? Are you watching games or just talking without thinking?
I happen to like Dwight and I think he'd be fine to build around, but right now he's NOT PLAYING WELL. At all! Giving him more possessions means more turnovers and more missed free throws. That's it.
JGC wrote:And let the record shows you have said Earl Clark is a bad player.
I did say that. When we first traded for him and he did NOTHING in the league to even warrant a contract. He came here, got an opportunity and is playing DIFFERENTLY than he's ever played before. He's never attacked the basket as much or as effectively, he's never defended so many types of players so effectively, and he's never shot the ball as well as he is now. Never.
Let the record show that as time goes on, people change. Mark the record on that please.
JGC wrote:That doesn't of course, mean you can be right about Howard, you may very well be but even a broken clock is right twice a day. (I'm not saying you're a broken clock, just that you've been wrong before so I have no assurance you aren't wrong again).
This sentence is both insulting and idiotic. Not that I'm calling you those things, just saying that what you're saying is so it might be when you respond again.
JGC wrote:By the way, where did you see that Dwight gets more touches than every player in the NBA except 1?
It's floating around the site and was reported this morning by Collin Cowherd on ESPN 710. The only other big man with more touches is Randolph in Memphis.
JGC wrote:Also, this is where reading comprehension becomes very important. I didn't say I thought Kobe could only play 28 mins/game. You clearly aren't reading. First I said we should determine the MAXIMUM number of minutes that Kobe can play where he can give it his all on BOTH sides of the ball. And then I said that IF that number is as low as 28 mins, then so be it, at least we get a full capacity of Kobe Bryant for those 28 mins.
This is where reading comprehension becomes very important. I never said you thought Kobe could only play 28 mins/game. You clearly aren't reading. First I said that you shouldn't use hyperbole as your point because it robs you of credability. And then I said Kobe Brayant can play effectively 30+ minutes a game. I never said anything else on the subject and any other point you made is some ridiculous way for you to try to "win" an argument. It's paper thin, and intelligent posters can pick through it easily
JGC wrote:So you're saying that's the reason people label me a hater? Is because I said that IF Kobe can only play 28 mins/game,
This is where reading comprehension becomes very important. Here is what I said:
You use hyperbole a lot and if you want to be taken more seriously, you should try not doing that.
I didn't say that the reason people label you a hater is because of this one assertion, it's because of your long history of using hyperbole to try to win arguments. Debates and arguements are best won with facts, not overblown examples.
JGC wrote:Or, are you saying people label me a hater because they completely misread what I wrote? Because I certainly did not say he can only play 28 mins -- if that's what you are suggesting I said then you're either flat out lying or made an honest mistake. Which is it?
Refer to the above. Reading Comprehension. Some people lack it. I'm not saying you lack it, just that some people do.