Ty Lawson: Lakers Were Easy Work, Clippers Are Dope As Hell

LakerFanIam wrote:

trodgers wrote:Scrub-a-dub-dub.

He's not an All-Star, but 14ppg & 7asst with an Efficiency rating of +14 is hardly a scrub.

He's a borderline starter at the PG spot. In this sort of conversation, he's a scrub. He's an absolute nobody in the NBA.

Doc Brown wrote:Just wait til we get Steve Blake back Ty.

Not to mention Steve Black who will kick their bleep.....

No u

Bryant has a long memory.......

and the Lakers are known to turn things around fast .... either by play or by moves

be careful Ty

Don't poke a sleeping bear

trodgers wrote:

LakerFanIam wrote:

trodgers wrote:Scrub-a-dub-dub.

He's not an All-Star, but 14ppg & 7asst with an Efficiency rating of +14 is hardly a scrub.

He's a borderline starter at the PG spot. In this sort of conversation, he's a scrub. He's an absolute nobody in the NBA.

You & I have a different definition of "scrub" then, I guess...

Chillbongo wrote:He's a small fry. Let him have his glory.

They ain't gonna see past round 2.

lol at this rate we aren't even going to make it to the playoffs

All people talk when they are playing well... Then when they lose they say nothing.

He's right. The Lakers suck. No team should fear us.

The Laker Link wrote:Who said what and why do I care?

Ty Lawson... &, I guess you don't.

But, the real issue is... Teams don't fear The Lakers, at all. We can play it off & say "he's just a scrub", or "how many Championships have they won?" But it doesn't change the fact that no one respects this team right now, nor should they.

LakerFanIam wrote:

The Laker Link wrote:Who said what and why do I care?

Ty Lawson... &, I guess you don't.

But, the real issue is... Teams don't fear The Lakers, at all. We can play it off & say "he's just a scrub", or "how many Championships have they won?" But it doesn't change the fact that no one respects this team right now, nor should they.

Especially after a lot of fans were ready to hold a parade after dwight got here. I think a lot of players resent super teams and i can see why they are glad to see us fail. Like when the miami trio got together...

what has the world come to? no nba team is a afraid of the lakers but everyone is and wont say a word bad about the clippers

ok let him his glory have for now . see ya later little guy. don t care much about that . lakers have right now bigger issues. but i guess he will regret after february 25 th. maybe that wakes our guys up. so thanks for that lawson

Ariza3 wrote:what has the world come to? no nba team is a afraid of the lakers but everyone is and wont say a word bad about the clippers

Like i said if it weren't for Stern and the crybaby owners who made the CBA to handcuff the Lakers and block the CP3 trade, we'd be rolling the league. Once we get both Pau and Kobe's contracts down to a reasonable level (we'll probably even and up trading Pau) the Lakers will be able to do make better moves. Don't worry, they'll pay. They'll all pay..........................

Your average kick em while they're down comment by an average player. Nothing new here.

LakerFanIam wrote:

trodgers wrote:

LakerFanIam wrote:

trodgers wrote:Scrub-a-dub-dub.

He's not an All-Star, but 14ppg & 7asst with an Efficiency rating of +14 is hardly a scrub.

He's a borderline starter at the PG spot. In this sort of conversation, he's a scrub. He's an absolute nobody in the NBA.

You & I have a different definition of "scrub" then, I guess...

Does this make Nash a scrub? =(

I don't remember Nash talking trash about other teams, so irrelevant.

Agree/disagree

1. Some people earn the right to talk about other teams.
2. Ty Lawson has not earned that right.

I says, "Yes" to both. And that's the sense of scrub I'm using here. There's a sense in which no one in the NBA is a scrub. That's not an interesting use of the word. There's another sense in which people who can't crack the rotation are scrubs; that's an interesting sense of the word. But so is the one I'm using.

U mad bros? lol

Did he say anything that wasn't true? How can we possibly be pissed about this?

It's not like Lawson is wrong or anything. So I can't get mad at the dude...

trodgers wrote:I don't remember Nash talking trash about other teams, so irrelevant.

In order to be a scrub you have to talk trash about other teams? So it doesn't have anything to do with performance then? Or is it a talk trash + minimum stat type of prerequisite? Or, maybe we just keep changing it till fits, I dunno, haha.

But Lawson is not a scrub by any stretch.

JGC wrote:

trodgers wrote:I don't remember Nash talking trash about other teams, so irrelevant.

In order to be a scrub you have to talk trash about other teams? So it doesn't have anything to do with performance then? Or is it a talk trash + minimum stat type of prerequisite? Or, maybe we just keep changing it till fits, I dunno, haha.

But Lawson is not a scrub by any stretch.

And Ty is not in Nash's level in any way. I suspect you know that but as usual smug takes over and you make statements like this. Ty can score...ya him. He is just better than a backup which he is having a career year against. If they are so much better they wouldnt feel the need to discuss us plain and simple.

By those standards I guess Luke Walton is not a scrub because he's not a [Swearing is not permitted at Clublakers. You must edit this post prior to submitting.] talker. Or is it cuz Luke earned the right because he's a multi champ?

What he was getting at was that Ty Lawson is a "scrub" in terms of those who have a right to talk trash.

If Russel Westbrook said it, completely different. Dude has the right to talk trash---his team made the Finals and he is a repeating all star.

And Nash's "talking" has nothing to do with his status as a scrub. IT'S TY FREAKIN LAWSON. And yes, even if Nash did say it, he's a 2 time MVP and 5th in assists ALL TIME---not a scrub.

Adam Morrison gets to talk trash cuz he has the rings to back it up.

real talk yo!