A little more perspective.

Lakers Dynasty 2000 · by **Lakers Dynasty 2000** on Mon May 19, 2003 4:43 pm

"For those still sad...

You just watched your team win three rings...

do you realize...

Only four franchises in 56 years have EVER won at least 3, and not just in a row?

Just imagine all those great Sixer teams with Wilt and then Dr. J., all those great Knick teams in the 70's and then the Ewing era, and yet they only managed 4 rings between them. Even Bird only managed 3 total.

We are truly blessed.

Celtics 16
Lakers 14
Bulls 6
Warriors 3
Rockets 2
Pistons 2
76ers 2
Bullets (Wizards) 2
Knicks 2
Spurs 1
Sonics 1
Blazers 1
Bucks 1
Hawks 1
Syracuse Ntls. 1
Rochester Royals 1"

Originally posted by Dutz51, a great, knowledgable Lakers fan.

LakersGyrl2003 · by **LakersGyrl2003** on Mon May 19, 2003 4:50 pm

And we're not a dynasty team.... LMAO :man1:

Lakers Dynasty 2000 · by **Lakers Dynasty 2000** on Mon May 19, 2003 5:11 pm

Yup, Mr. Red A., you better watch out, were only 2 championships behind you :man12:

LakersGyrl2003 · by **LakersGyrl2003** on Mon May 19, 2003 5:12 pm

Yeap.... Dayam, it's like HE wants the glory and F^&k everyone else, u know? I hope he eats his words when he said that winning 3 in a row isn't a dynasty... He's hatin on 2 of the best teams, right there... :man3:

Reddy · by **Reddy** on Mon May 19, 2003 11:07 pm

kobe accepts hte extension we are in for the most rings in history :man11:

LakersGyrl2003 · by **LakersGyrl2003** on Mon May 19, 2003 11:59 pm

Reddy wrote:kobe accepts hte extension we are in for the most rings in history

and u know this REDDY!! :man1:

A little more perspective.

A little more perspective.

Who is online