Its like Dr. Buss is guarding the Celtic rim this second half. Nothings dropping

Its like Dr. Buss is guarding the Celtic rim this second half. Nothings dropping
Phil XI wrote:Is this a trick question?
Obviously, its Douglas, who has been in an NBA rotation on a regular basis.
Too bad LA was picking him for another GM, who could actually see the talent.

Its like Dr. Buss is guarding the Celtic rim this second half. Nothings dropping
therealdeal wrote:So does Darius Johnson-Odom not count since we bought his pick?
trodgers wrote:^ That's a fair question. I guess just like maybe Douglas shouldn't count for us, maybe DJO should count for us. Is DJO better than Glock, Morris, and Ebanks?
without even seeing him play more than 10 minutes as an NBA player I might put him above Morris or Ebanks. therealdeal wrote:trodgers wrote:^ That's a fair question. I guess just like maybe Douglas shouldn't count for us, maybe DJO should count for us. Is DJO better than Glock, Morris, and Ebanks?
Hm... I might put him above those guyswithout even seeing him play more than 10 minutes as an NBA player I might put him above Morris or Ebanks.
I'm not as enamored with Goudelock as everyone else is. The guy was one of the worst defenders in the league when he played. He was okay as a PG, but truly detrimental as a SG. And since he can't create for others at an NBA level he was a bad PG too. I think DJO has a chance to be much better than Goudelock.
If DJO doesn't count (and you're right he probably shouldn't if we keep Douglas out) then I'm going with *gulp* Ebanks. I'm sick of the kid and I think he squandered away some real potential to be a solid role player, but he's the best out of the group thus far. I think Morris can probably pass him though and Goudelock if he ever gets back into the league can too.
therealdeal wrote:The difference between Morris and Goudelock defensively is the difference between a 100 year old redwood tree and a potted flower.
Morris's defense ranges from good to great. Goudelock's ranges from utterly dreadful to not very good.
Offensively, Morris is actually doing an adequate job of spacing the floor which is really all that Goudelock would do here. But the difference there wouldn't be enough to make up for Morris's contributions on defense.
i think i remember when they drafted him he was averaging .5 ppg in the d league
JGC wrote:therealdeal wrote:The difference between Morris and Goudelock defensively is the difference between a 100 year old redwood tree and a potted flower.
Morris's defense ranges from good to great. Goudelock's ranges from utterly dreadful to not very good.
Offensively, Morris is actually doing an adequate job of spacing the floor which is really all that Goudelock would do here. But the difference there wouldn't be enough to make up for Morris's contributions on defense.
Good and fair points. The added bonus on Morris is with his height we can stick him on SGs when the situation calls for it.


Frank Dux wrote:Did the Lakers do the impossible? 5 drafts and maybe only one rotation player?
JGC wrote:Frank Dux wrote:Did the Lakers do the impossible? 5 drafts and maybe only one rotation player?
We traded away all of our picks though. We turned picks in to Jordan Hill, Ramon Sessions, etc.
Frank Dux wrote:Did the Lakers do the impossible? 5 drafts and maybe only one rotation player?
Users browsing this forum: CaCHooKa Man, Doc Brown, karacha, LakerFan1235, lakerfan2, wcsoldier81, Weezy and 13 guests