Its like Dr. Buss is guarding the Celtic rim this second half. Nothings dropping

phoenixrisingla wrote:Thats the beauty of stats, they say exactly what they say.
Saw these numbers last week and its really depressing how they illustrate how ineffective/inefficient Dwight is this year.
http://www.82games.com/1213/ROLRTG8.HTM
These are interesting as well. Measures how much a player scores vs the opponent at his position and also scoring =/- while in/out of the game.

khmrP wrote:phoenixrisingla wrote:Thats the beauty of stats, they say exactly what they say.
Saw these numbers last week and its really depressing how they illustrate how ineffective/inefficient Dwight is this year.
http://www.82games.com/1213/ROLRTG8.HTM
These are interesting as well. Measures how much a player scores vs the opponent at his position and also scoring =/- while in/out of the game.
so I guess we shouldn't be worried if he leaves or not, seeing as how he does nothing for us anyways in terms of winning
phoenixrisingla wrote:khmrP wrote:phoenixrisingla wrote:Thats the beauty of stats, they say exactly what they say.
Saw these numbers last week and its really depressing how they illustrate how ineffective/inefficient Dwight is this year.
http://www.82games.com/1213/ROLRTG8.HTM
These are interesting as well. Measures how much a player scores vs the opponent at his position and also scoring =/- while in/out of the game.
so I guess we shouldn't be worried if he leaves or not, seeing as how he does nothing for us anyways in terms of winning
Your sarcasm is VERY clever, but yes.
I'm not sure if you noticed, but he IS playing and we're NOT winning.
khmrP wrote:phoenixrisingla wrote:khmrP wrote:phoenixrisingla wrote:Thats the beauty of stats, they say exactly what they say.
Saw these numbers last week and its really depressing how they illustrate how ineffective/inefficient Dwight is this year.
http://www.82games.com/1213/ROLRTG8.HTM
These are interesting as well. Measures how much a player scores vs the opponent at his position and also scoring =/- while in/out of the game.
so I guess we shouldn't be worried if he leaves or not, seeing as how he does nothing for us anyways in terms of winning
Your sarcasm is VERY clever, but yes.
I'm not sure if you noticed, but he IS playing and we're NOT winning.
Kobe is playing and has the highest +/- and we're not winning so what does that tell us?
phoenixrisingla wrote:That we have to much minus to make up for all of Kobe's plus.
This is an INDIVIDUAL stat. If you cant see the distinction between playing well in a loss and playing poorly in a loss then I'm not sure what to say...
I think Kobe could be doing more in terms of leadership, but at least he's playing well and seems like he wants to be here.

khmrP wrote:phoenixrisingla wrote:That we have to much minus to make up for all of Kobe's plus.
This is an INDIVIDUAL stat. If you cant see the distinction between playing well in a loss and playing poorly in a loss then I'm not sure what to say...
I think Kobe could be doing more in terms of leadership, but at least he's playing well and seems like he wants to be here.
Pau has a net + can you explain that to me, seeing as how I dont seem to understand this stat cause eye test I dont suggest that one bit as per your rebuttal here in regards to playing hard and wanting to be here stuff.
432J wrote:what is this, hockey?
it doesn't tell you anything
Its like Dr. Buss is guarding the Celtic rim this second half. Nothings dropping
phoenixrisingla wrote:khmrP wrote:phoenixrisingla wrote:That we have to much minus to make up for all of Kobe's plus.
This is an INDIVIDUAL stat. If you cant see the distinction between playing well in a loss and playing poorly in a loss then I'm not sure what to say...
I think Kobe could be doing more in terms of leadership, but at least he's playing well and seems like he wants to be here.
Pau has a net + can you explain that to me, seeing as how I dont seem to understand this stat cause eye test I dont suggest that one bit as per your rebuttal here in regards to playing hard and wanting to be here stuff.
Are you being serious?
I dont have to explain it to you. That stat is a representation of what actually happened.
You can say its meaningless if you dont like what the numbers say, but this is why we have stats. So we can have a recording of events/outcomes that occurred without the filter of subjective interpretation.
I'm not saying that you can say "leader in +/- is the best player in the league" but to say they are meaningless is equally asinine.
khmrP wrote:
so if stats dont lie, can you honestly say we're better off with Pau then Howard right now?
phoenixrisingla wrote:khmrP wrote:
so if stats dont lie, can you honestly say we're better off with Pau then Howard right now?
This is where it gets tricky, using stats to make bigger statments like that.
In my personal opinion, I think that Pau is a better low post scoring threat than Howard is. However I think that Howard is a better P&R big (although we're not using him that way enough).
I guess if I had to pick I'd go with Pau.
khmrP wrote:phoenixrisingla wrote:khmrP wrote:
so if stats dont lie, can you honestly say we're better off with Pau then Howard right now?
This is where it gets tricky, using stats to make bigger statments like that.
In my personal opinion, I think that Pau is a better low post scoring threat than Howard is. However I think that Howard is a better P&R big (although we're not using him that way enough).
I guess if I had to pick I'd go with Pau.
Pau WAS good in the post but we will see how this stat lives up to real world application when Pau is back in the middle w/o Howard soon enough.


Chillbongo wrote:So Kobe & MWP playing among the best on our team this year.....and them having the highest +/- doesn't tell us anything?
Pau's +/- stems from his assists & facilitating. Do you guys watch basketball? You know that a player's impact on the court can be made outside of points right?
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], noobiew, wcsoldier81 and 14 guests