Doc Brown wrote:Legendary wrote:What is everyone's opinion on D'Antoni's lineup adjustment?...Starting Earl and bringing Pau off the bench.
Was it a good move? Or will it bite us in the a**?
It's a great move. We have needed someone off the bench for awhile now that can create their own offense. Gasol does that in a different way than say Jamal Crawford, but it's still effective because he's great at orchestrating and dominating on offense when he wants to.
As long as he's playing confident and being the Gasol we want, on offense at least, the 2nd unit will look that much better.
Weezy wrote:I guess if he's getting paid to really do nothing, might as well have him as a figure head for the rest of the staff and a guy to scream at refs.
"I do not know if we are playing (Mike) D'Antoni's system much right now, we are doing our own system a bit, a slow passing game, putting a lot of the ball in the hands of Kobe (Bryant), playing blocks direct from the low post, and from there distributing the ball very well."
... +... 5%
... = 100% 
Jordan-esque wrote:http://www.acb.com/redaccion.php?id=91078
Pau Gasol: "We're playing our own system.""I do not know if we are playing (Mike) D'Antoni's system much right now, we are doing our own system a bit, a slow passing game, putting a lot of the ball in the hands of Kobe (Bryant), playing blocks direct from the low post, and from there distributing the ball very well."
Punk-101 wrote:TBH, I don't think they EVER really ran MDA's offense this year. Maybe because they didn't believe in it from the start or because it was too difficult to learn on the fly without a training camp, or maybe some of both.
MC wrote:Punk-101 wrote:TBH, I don't think they EVER really ran MDA's offense this year. Maybe because they didn't believe in it from the start or because it was too difficult to learn on the fly without a training camp, or maybe some of both.
They weren't running it fully but make no mistake there has been a change in philosophy of play these last 2 games which is the anti-MDA philosophy......
It also lead to way more responsible floor balance on the offensive end which in turn allowed the Lakers to have a CHANCE to get back in transition. That lead to more half court play and an all of a sudden stiffer defense....
Now will MDA continue this path........... that is the question I'm not sure of yet.
lakersin4 wrote:I don't see why Pau has to talk about it like that.. You're getting what you want, no need to throw D'antoni under the bus too. Hopefully D'antoni is a bit more mature about it, & doesn't respond by forcing his O on us again.
Punk-101 wrote:MC wrote:Punk-101 wrote:TBH, I don't think they EVER really ran MDA's offense this year. Maybe because they didn't believe in it from the start or because it was too difficult to learn on the fly without a training camp, or maybe some of both.
They weren't running it fully but make no mistake there has been a change in philosophy of play these last 2 games which is the anti-MDA philosophy......
It also lead to way more responsible floor balance on the offensive end which in turn allowed the Lakers to have a CHANCE to get back in transition. That lead to more half court play and an all of a sudden stiffer defense....
Now will MDA continue this path........... that is the question I'm not sure of yet.
Oh absolutely. My question is why. Trying to run MDA's offense with only 25% fluency looks like s*** so they gave up the 25% because what's the point. Why the lack of the rest of the 75%? No time to learn it? Resistance to learning it? Both? I ask because if MDA isn't fired in the offseason, I wonder if we'll see 100% MDA offense next year.


Jordan-esque wrote:http://www.acb.com/redaccion.php?id=91078
Pau Gasol: "We're playing our own system.""I do not know if we are playing (Mike) D'Antoni's system much right now, we are doing our own system a bit, a slow passing game, putting a lot of the ball in the hands of Kobe (Bryant), playing blocks direct from the low post, and from there distributing the ball very well."
davriver290 wrote:If they aren't running Mike's system, then thats a sign of a good coach. yes this season hasn't been impressive at all and our previous horrendous games are a testament to how bad this run n gun offense didn't work for us... But it shows that he was willing to adapt, and try something new.. Not a bad trait in a coach. Most are very stubborn and can only have it their way..

MC wrote:amazing what happens once you scrap the most irresponsible offense on earth and run the players on this roster to their strengths......... man that inefficient basketball sure seems to be effective and helps balance the floor in order to get back in transition.
Pringle's genius = pathetic hack
The way to win at the level needed is playing anti-MDA ball.....
The floor balance when shots go up has been much better the last 2 games doing it the right way instead of the MDA dumbazz way.

lakerfan2 wrote:The Kobe System?

davriver290 wrote:If they aren't running Mike's system, then thats a sign of a good coach. yes this season hasn't been impressive at all and our previous horrendous games are a testament to how bad this run n gun offense didn't work for us... But it shows that he was willing to adapt, and try something new.. Not a bad trait in a coach. Most are very stubborn and can only have it their way..
Weezy wrote:davriver290 wrote:If they aren't running Mike's system, then thats a sign of a good coach. yes this season hasn't been impressive at all and our previous horrendous games are a testament to how bad this run n gun offense didn't work for us... But it shows that he was willing to adapt, and try something new.. Not a bad trait in a coach. Most are very stubborn and can only have it their way..
A good coach? How can you be a good coach when your team can't start winning until you get out of the way?
Users browsing this forum: Jazzygirl205 and 9 guests