Chillbongo wrote:K-Love comes to mind because he's on the block and we need a big either because Gasol or Howard doesn't fit. And I'm not sure...a hand injury is a lot less severe than a back injury. It could end up worse for Love though, I'll admit that.
At least Kobe's game seriously mimic's Jordan's. Dwight's offensive game is light years, hell eons, from what Shaq's was.

Chillbongo wrote:K-Love comes to mind because he's on the block and we need a big either because Gasol or Howard doesn't fit. And I'm not sure...a hand injury is a lot less severe than a back injury. It could end up worse for Love though, I'll admit that.
At least Kobe's game seriously mimic's Jordan's. Dwight's offensive game is light years, hell eons, from what Shaq's was.
therealdeal wrote:To be fair I'm pretty sure Love has said he'll leave if they don't get him help.
And he was never happy with the way he wasn't offered to be the face of the franchise over Rubio.
khmrP wrote:therealdeal wrote:To be fair I'm pretty sure Love has said he'll leave if they don't get him help.
And he was never happy with the way he wasn't offered to be the face of the franchise over Rubio.
that doesn't mean he's on the block, people are just "assuming." Love just had a face to face with Min FO, maybe they cleared up the issues. Besides that contract setup was actually a good thing for Love, he can get out of there sooner, its still max just not max years.

therealdeal wrote:To be fair I'm pretty sure Love has said he'll leave if they don't get him help.
And he was never happy with the way he wasn't offered to be the face of the franchise over Rubio.
therealdeal wrote:khmrP wrote:therealdeal wrote:To be fair I'm pretty sure Love has said he'll leave if they don't get him help.
And he was never happy with the way he wasn't offered to be the face of the franchise over Rubio.
that doesn't mean he's on the block, people are just "assuming." Love just had a face to face with Min FO, maybe they cleared up the issues. Besides that contract setup was actually a good thing for Love, he can get out of there sooner, its still max just not max years.
Yeah, but they could have given him max years and just allowed him to have options on the last two.
There's a few things we know and this is where the speculation comes from:
1. Love isn't happy there. That's not really debatable, he's said it before and he's said he wants to win/get into the playoffs. As long as they aren't winning, he won't be happy according to his words.
2. Minnesota LOVES Gasol. We all know this and it's been acknowledged multiple times.
3. We have Gasol and they have Love.
My personal speculation would have to have Love demanding out and then I'd think Gasol on a massive expiring contract looks great for that kind of piece back. A guy who wants out on a contract that's not great for a small market team... They end up freeing up money just in time for Rubio...

Chillbongo wrote:dwighthowardsdad wrote:Now, check this out; he's averaging about 17 and 12 and 2 blocks. I just rounded it off; Now, if we sign him and this his is peak, we can always look to trade him. Even signed to a max contract, there will always be potential suitors for Dwight. So, if it doesn't work, and he's signed long-term, he can still be moved, IMO. We did it with Shaq. We'll do it with Dwight. There's always options.
You know, I do agree with your post for the most part. But here's my concern.
Let's say he doesn't become the player that he was in ORL, or even get most of it back. Or continues to have injury issues (all plausible, btw)...we signed him for a max contract based on his potential. If he doesn't live up to that potential or even 75% of it, his value declines greatly....and at that hypothetical point, we could look to trade him as you said, but would get much less in return.
How many teams are going to want to take on that Dwight's 3-4 years @ $60-80M? If we could trade him RIGHT now for a guy like K-Love (after medical clearance from our doctors), pieces and picks...pair him with Gasol for next year and then retool in 2014 with really only Nash on our books...that helps us compete now and later.
I understand your point with Shaq, but you don't really believe they were on the same level right? Shaq dominated. Absolutely dominated...even after toe injury and all. He still was a BEAST...still had more post-game than Dwight, was an anchor, and a great passer. He came motivated to win, and wasn't as mentally fragile. That's why we could do it with Shaq. And even STILL we got LO/Caron/Grant and some other pieces. Grant was a bust...Caron was underdeveloped....and LO was really the only solid return. But for Shaq? The MDE?
lakersin4 wrote:Love & Dwight with Hill & Clark off the bench wouldn't even be fair..

Instant win.

dwighthowardsdad wrote:I would say, IMO, this is the worst Dwight we're going to see. I do believe his averages his points & rebounds will go up; We're not in a league where centers are that strong of a position anymore, so the competition Dwight faces isn't radically going to effect his numbers & effectiveness, IMO. If anything, I think he'll be ready to go next season and his value will increase, IMO. So, if we have to trade him for any reason, I believe we'll be okay.
They're paying an extra $30 million this year alone. The Time Warner deal is reportedly worth 3 billion dollars. We're one of the only two organizations in the league that operate in the black with estimated profits of 37 million dollars a year. We'll have Love & Dwight playing together, IMO.
No, Shaq isn't Dwight. We'll still get something, though if it comes to that. Mitch is a genius...

lakersyunowin wrote:the future is murky. i'm not sold on dwight or d'antoni...we'll just have to see.

Users browsing this forum: cantthinkofone, Google [Bot], jonnyshevanel, lakersin4, Weezy and 13 guests