
wcsoldier81 wrote:His D/overall energy is needed but he's an embarrassement at the offensive end ... with Nash in the lineup , he will be open all game long and will keep bricking open 3s ...
I can't think of a worst fit playing next to Nash ... can't run or put the ball off the floor ... we badly need a more athletic and 2 way SF


KeepBynum wrote:wcsoldier81 wrote:His D/overall energy is needed but he's an embarrassement at the offensive end ... with Nash in the lineup , he will be open all game long and will keep bricking open 3s ...
I can't think of a worst fit playing next to Nash ... can't run or put the ball off the floor ... we badly need a more athletic and 2 way SF
How is he an embarassment on the offensive end? Did you not watch the 2nd half of the season? He was terrific on both ends. He was just out of shape due to the lockout.
wcsoldier81 wrote:His D/overall energy is needed but he's an embarrassement at the offensive end ... with Nash in the lineup , he will be open all game long and will keep bricking open 3s ...
I can't think of a worst fit playing next to Nash ... can't run or put the ball off the floor ... we badly need a more athletic and 2 way SF
wcsoldier81 wrote:His D/overall energy is needed but he's an embarrassement at the offensive end ... with Nash in the lineup , he will be open all game long and will keep bricking open 3s ...
I can't think of a worst fit playing next to Nash ... can't run or put the ball off the floor ... we badly need a more athletic and 2 way SF

KB24 wrote:ya I have to agree with wcsoldier
Artest is a horrible fit for Nash...actually to be honest, this entire team is built to play half-court. We have slow front court players, slow back court players and slow wings. We can't shoot or run the court. All we can is post up with Bynum, Gasol, Kobe or Artest.
It will be very challenging to see how Nash makes all this work while not falling asleep on fastbreaks because our lame ducks aren't running the floor hard.
Lakerjones wrote:We need what he brings even if he's getting older. We have no one else who can lock down the other team's best player, and Nash certainly doesn't help that issue. More than ever we need some defensive intensity.
Doc Brown wrote:I'd move Ron depending on who was coming back to play small forward for us.
If that person could shoot consistently, play defense and is younger and more athletic, then yea Ron is expendable to me.


I'm gonna spam the hell out of this idea until more people love it. 


Daniel Artest @TheRealDMArtest
LA can't sign Steve Nash w/out removing a player. I guess Ron is the odd man out. Sucks, but I'll be booking my south beach tickets.
Daniel Artest @TheRealDMArtest
Salary dump flow


gill wrote:I thought Nash fits right into the TPE from LO trade?

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests