MWPeace Discussion: amnesty? (pg. 203)

therealdeal wrote: I'll also take it... for now.

But once his defense stops making up for his offense, I want him on the bench or on another team (preferably the former).

Yeah unfortunately he's more up and down than a girl at the wrong time of the month. Of course if we improve he is expendable.

But I'd love to see the number of possession changes he has caused. Or the number of times he's made a momentum basket....like when the game was within a few points in the 2nd half. He does have a knack for that.

I'm also afraid that he becomes a true black hole on the bench, but that's purely speculation.

As for the hypothetical Deng trade...Pau + Metta for Deng & Butler/Belinelli & a pick?

i just remembered that Ebanks is the other option...i'm not so mad anymore

Chillbongo wrote:

therealdeal wrote: I'll also take it... for now.

But once his defense stops making up for his offense, I want him on the bench or on another team (preferably the former).

Yeah unfortunately he's more up and down than a girl at the wrong time of the month. Of course if we improve he is expendable.

But I'd love to see the number of possession changes he has caused. Or the number of times he's made a momentum basket....like when the game was within a few points in the 2nd half. He does have a knack for that.

I'm also afraid that he becomes a true black hole on the bench, but that's purely speculation.

As for the hypothetical Deng trade...Pau + Metta for Deng & Butler/Belinelli & a pick?

Pau alone makes MORE than the entire trio of those Bulls, Boozer would have to be included or routed to a 3rd team.

khmrP wrote:Pau alone makes MORE than the entire trio of those Bulls, Boozer would have to be included or routed to a 3rd team.

Yes of course a third team would be involved. We wouldn't want Chicago's pick and they would never take both MWP & Pau.

Chillbongo wrote:

khmrP wrote:Pau alone makes MORE than the entire trio of those Bulls, Boozer would have to be included or routed to a 3rd team.

Yes of course a third team would be involved. We wouldn't want Chicago's pick and they would never take both MWP & Pau.

I think they would, MWP/Pau both expire next season but the question here though is do we need Deng that badly and do we really hate MWP that badly to eat Boozer contract? My answer, HELL F'N NO!

Nope, don't want Boozer.

Why would we trade Pau for Boozer?

Chillbongo wrote:Nope, don't want Boozer.

Why would we trade Pau for Boozer?

because he's needed to make the salary work, like I said your scenario of Pau for Deng and 1 or 2 low end Bulls players dont work salary wise as both teams re over the cap. Also Bulls wont take on Pau w/o dropping Boozer, so either they amensty him (highly doubt that) or we have to take on more useless contracts then the names you listed.

3rd team. Someone wants Boozer, someone wants Pau.

Chillbongo wrote:3rd team. Someone wants Boozer, someone wants Pau.

Tor who desperately wants to dump Bargani didn't even want Boozer, says alot of Boozer contract/value

I really believe there will be a high probability that MWP will get amnestied this off-season.

I'm not saying I don't like him or that I am for him. Right now I am indifferent (middle of the road). I love his hustle and that magical left hand of his when he steals every ball that comes into contact with it, but this guy can't hit consistent shots. If we had someone in that SF spot that made just half all of misses MWP has had over the course of the month of February we would be in a lot better shape.

Time will tell I guess

I dont see LA amenstying anyone, they didn't do it the 1st time and there's no signs of it this time around outside of writers/fans speculations.

double

I don't know why I get frustrated with Metta anymore. He does this time and time.

Good start, slow midseason, rising end to season. Then he usually shows up for playoffs.

khmrP wrote:I dont see LA amenstying anyone, they didn't do it the 1st time and there's no signs of it this time around outside of writers/fans speculations.

Brian Grant says hi.

Juronimo wrote:

khmrP wrote:I dont see LA amenstying anyone, they didn't do it the 1st time and there's no signs of it this time around outside of writers/fans speculations.

Brian Grant says hi.

so he does

therealdeal wrote:4. Everything else.

Re-signing Jamison should be it's own category, lol.

Seriously though, I think it's probably the next most important thing behind re-signing Clark. Dude was our only consistent bench.

Here's to hoping he put a FAT mortgage on a house in Malibu. He'll want that extra $

khmrP wrote:I dont see LA amenstying anyone, they didn't do it the 1st time and there's no signs of it this time around outside of writers/fans speculations.

The only reason why I brought it up was because now that Jim is in charge and I'm not hating him on this but he might want to control our salary a little and he can do that by using the amnesty clause on Metta.

But Real, I think your right, it will depend on if we can get good, young value back for Gasol if MGT does decide to trade him. Priority #1 though is to resign Howard and then Resign Clark!

WTF is with the league giving him a flagrant foul ... there was no intent on that play in 3rd quarter ...

Buulllllllll