easyguy wrote:I'm sorry, if we need Nash to be back to win anything, we have a bigger problem than we have thought. The Lakers should be winning without Nash.
one of the best PGs of all-time and it's outlandish that we need him if we want to be a contender? yeah that makes sense...
I agree with you but I see where easyguy is coming from.
We shouldn't lose to teams like the Pacers, period. Not at home. We have laid many eggs like in Sacramento or against Dallas at home.
Nash is a difference maker but right now we look like a lottery team. With or without Nash, we should be a contender...Nash is supposed to put us over the hump, not help us make the playoffs.
"It is not how big you are, it is how big you play"
"Basketball doesn't build character. It reveals it"
"Be strong in body, clean in mind, lofty in ideals"