Whatthef? wrote:Who wants to bet the Lakers have a worse record than the Clippers this year? Dallas goes back to the finals?
Thanks Mitch.





Whatthef? wrote:Who wants to bet the Lakers have a worse record than the Clippers this year? Dallas goes back to the finals?
Thanks Mitch.

Snake Eyes wrote:Whatthef? wrote:Who wants to bet the Lakers have a worse record than the Clippers this year? Dallas goes back to the finals?
Thanks Mitch.
You can't blame Mitch for this. He had no clue that Stern was going to veto the trade that sent LO and co. to their respective destinations.
borri wrote:Yes Stern played a role....but let's not let LO off the hook here.
1. LAL didn't want to trade LO. They had to if they wanted to get CP3. That's part of the business of being an NBA player. It's not like LAL didn't want LO around. They had to do what they had to do. If CP3 wasn't a viable option, no way LO would be in a trade discussion unless there's a good deal out there.
2. It's not like LO wasn't traded before. Sack up.
3. No excuse for LO to act like a vag....
So for me, 50% Stern, 50% LO. Pau didn't act up like a little B....just sayin'.
Shadow wrote:Snake Eyes wrote:Whatthef? wrote:Who wants to bet the Lakers have a worse record than the Clippers this year? Dallas goes back to the finals?
Thanks Mitch.
You can't blame Mitch for this. He had no clue that Stern was going to veto the trade that sent LO and co. to their respective destinations.
As a GM he should of been prepared or had a back up plan, even Phil Jackson called this a year ago. So part of the blame does go for Mitch and the rest of management.

borri wrote:Yes Stern played a role....but let's not let LO off the hook here.
1. LAL didn't want to trade LO. They had to if they wanted to get CP3. That's part of the business of being an NBA player. It's not like LAL didn't want LO around. They had to do what they had to do. If CP3 wasn't a viable option, no way LO would be in a trade discussion unless there's a good deal out there.
2. It's not like LO wasn't traded before. Sack up.
3. No excuse for LO to act like a vag....
So for me, 50% Stern, 50% LO. Pau didn't act up like a little B....just sayin'.

kray28 wrote:Lamar was a salary dump...not much mystery there. If he had acted calmly and like a professional though....I wonder what would have happened? The way he acted gave the Lakers the excuse they needed.
McRoberts is a younger and cheaper version replacement for Lamar.
As for the trade with Houston...it's not a bad trade on its' face, but I question the need to do it. Earlier, I advocated it, but that was before I saw that Pau was handling the trade rumors like a champ. I think he's going to be fine, and I think we are better served with holding onto him.

kray28 wrote:Lamar was a salary dump...not much mystery there. If he had acted calmly and like a professional though....I wonder what would have happened? The way he acted gave the Lakers the excuse they needed.
The Original 81 wrote:LO a bonafide star? I love LO, but YOU my friend can't be serious.

Users browsing this forum: kingjsun, nickvanexel, XXIV and 23 guests