Lakerjones wrote:I don't even want to think of a roster change with our starters right now. This is a dream team on paper that's been totally ruined by crappy coaching. Don't touch the starting 5.
The only roster move I desperately want to see is us bringing in a quality backup Point Guard. We've needed one since the beginning of the season. Blake hasn't cut it. Duhon's basically just as bad (although I thought he looked better than Blake in his limited preseason minutes). Morris is a disaster.
And now that Steve Nash is injured and will miss some significant time, this issue has just become more glaring.
Rooscooter wrote:juninho wrote:i don't think we will make any trades, this core will compete for next two years and then we will reload in 2014 summer.
I don't think Pau will be here next year even if we win it all...... his "expiring" contract will be the largest of all time and I'm sure we'd try and turn it into a couple pieces while trying to get out from under it.
I'm not convinced at all that we quit trying to trade Pau because we got Nash..... I think it's because nobody wanted him at that price and we couldn't even "give" him away...... I think the "he'll mesh well with Nash" stuff is cover for what the league already knows..... and Laker fans are beginning to realize.... He just isn't the same player he was 3 years ago.....
I'd love Granger and West from Indiana.... both expire at the same time and the money is about right (we may have to toss in Ebanks) but that would give us a much more compatible starting line up and a PF that absolutely thrived in the pick and roll with the punk that's in the other home locker room.....


The Original 81 wrote:What if we move Pau to the bench? Start Jamison. Gives Howard more room and provides better balance than what we currently have. Also allows Pau to be the primary low post scorer and facilitator for the bench.
Blake/Meeks/Ebanks/Hill/Pau
karacha wrote:For all those trades to happen, we would need a team that's actually willing to take Pau now... and you know, he's kind of expensive. If Pau was a 10-11M player, it would be easier to live his his current level of performance.
I do think playing less minutes would help him somewhat. And a coach who could inspire him to playmore in the post, because he can be a beast there.


Rooscooter wrote:juninho wrote:i don't think we will make any trades, this core will compete for next two years and then we will reload in 2014 summer.
I don't think Pau will be here next year even if we win it all...... his "expiring" contract will be the largest of all time and I'm sure we'd try and turn it into a couple pieces while trying to get out from under it.
I'm not convinced at all that we quit trying to trade Pau because we got Nash..... I think it's because nobody wanted him at that price and we couldn't even "give" him away...... I think the "he'll mesh well with Nash" stuff is cover for what the league already knows..... and Laker fans are beginning to realize.... He just isn't the same player he was 3 years ago.....
I'd love Granger and West from Indiana.... both expire at the same time and the money is about right (we may have to toss in Ebanks) but that would give us a much more compatible starting line up and a PF that absolutely thrived in the pick and roll with the punk that's in the other home locker room.....
Doc Brown wrote:Not saying we should trade Pau for him, but....
I'd love a guy like Varejao on the team. Always plays 100%, always rebounds, always plays defense and never needs a play called for him on the offensive end. He's started off great this season.
It’s really no surprise, but the Bulls are having no luck trying to move Richard Hamilton, whose $5 million in 2012-13 is fully guaranteed. New York Daily News
escobar8 wrote:i wouldnt mind that trade...i think people a lil bit overrating pau here...
he sucked for last two years...he knows to disappear over the season and even in play offs...while geting 20mil...
he is slow and weakminded...and people are allways finding excuses for him...
is he one of the most skilled and one of the most smartest big men in the game...???yes he is...but that doesnt mean much when other players are runing around you, while he is not capable to punish other players on offense...he is now much better version of luke walton( dont want to realy compare them...its more like example of good IQ player but with out athletic abilities)botom line he is weak and slow...j.smith can solve that problems...i know we are losing skiled big man but thats why have nash...imagine Pnr between nash and smith or dwight...thats unstopable...we need fresh blood...plus he would be only 3-4 option...he might be perfect adition while playing under nash kobe and howard...plus i dont think pau would make atl any better...maybe its time to go to club who drafted him in the first place...
therealdeal wrote:So what does Pau Gasol have to do before Laker fans are ready to stop throwing him under the bus? He's played well to start the season and we're putting it on him that we're losing? We're trying to get Smith for him?
If Pau expires and we have a chance to get Smith, that's maybe one thing but trading Pau for him? Jesus, no.
And moving him to the bench would be worse. Not only is he playing fewer minutes and playing less effectively, but you have 19 million dollars on the bench losing any potential trade value. That's insanity.
Pau isn't the problem here. Not by a long shot.

therealdeal wrote:So what does Pau Gasol have to do before Laker fans are ready to stop throwing him under the bus? He's played well to start the season and we're putting it on him that we're losing? We're trying to get Smith for him?
If Pau expires and we have a chance to get Smith, that's maybe one thing but trading Pau for him? Jesus, no.
And moving him to the bench would be worse. Not only is he playing fewer minutes and playing less effectively, but you have 19 million dollars on the bench losing any potential trade value. That's insanity.
Pau isn't the problem here. Not by a long shot.
therealdeal wrote:So what does Pau Gasol have to do before Laker fans are ready to stop throwing him under the bus? He's played well to start the season and we're putting it on him that we're losing? We're trying to get Smith for him?
If Pau expires and we have a chance to get Smith, that's maybe one thing but trading Pau for him? Jesus, no.
And moving him to the bench would be worse. Not only is he playing fewer minutes and playing less effectively, but you have 19 million dollars on the bench losing any potential trade value. That's insanity.
Pau isn't the problem here. Not by a long shot.
Users browsing this forum: Kobe8Fan, OX1947, Yahoo [Bot] and 19 guests