Shaq in the 02' NBA finals of the sweep of the New Jersey Nets:
37 ppg/ 15 rpg/ 6 apg/ 5 bpg
Tim Dunkin in the competitive 6 games series of the 03' NBA Finals against the New Jersey Nets
26 ppg/ 14 rpg/ 6 apg/ 5 bpg
although both preformances were of MVP Type play, Tim put up his numbers with pure grace and fundumental skill, Shaq on the other hand, put up his numbers by imposing his dominance by sheer streanth and agility. Facing the undeniable facts, Shaq is the "Most Dominant Ever" (MDE), but Tim, Undeniably by his game 6 preformance in the Finals,
20pts/20rbs/10ast/8blks, is still the Big Fundumental, But hasnt done enough or realy hasnt proved himself to the leval of Shaq, to deserve any "self " Given Award, like Shaq's MDE Award that no one even argues with. It all depends on what the question is, on who will come out on top, but in the specific case, Shaq wins by a land slide. In this stage of both of their careers, If you want imeediate championships by force, the obvious pick is Shaq, Which is the exact player all GM's realy want, even San Antonio, (yes they would trade Tim for Shaq any day), but if you are looking out for the long term, you mights want to refer to, in Shaq's words, "The Big Fundumental", Tim Duncin. All in all though, at this point, Shaq will allways win over duncin on who a team would rather have. Thats the real decisive factor. But, if SpursFanatic50 is reading this, your timmy, in about 3 years, will be considered on the same level as but but just with a different style. But u know it and i know it, their has never been anyone quite like Shaquille O'Neil.
Quoting Shaq on one of his spontainious freestyles durring practices:
"I stay paid niggaaa, I live laid niggaaa, I've been rappen ever since the third grade niggaaa".