Should the Lakers trade Pau for DWillie and Love?

Weezy · by **Weezy** on Sun Dec 16, 2012 6:34 pm

Should we? Of course. Would Minnesota do it? Hell no.

Center Court · by **Center Court** on Sun Dec 16, 2012 6:44 pm

Punk-101 wrote:No way in hell Minn gives up Love for Pau.

Just how desperate are they though to pair Pau with Rubio?

I think this trade is extremely lopsided in our favor, but maybe Minn considers if they want Pau so badly:

Pau/Blake/Ebanks

for

AK47/Dwill/Pek/Barea

That makes us a VERY deep and balanced team, esp in the MDA offense.

Nash/Barea
Kobe/Meeks
AK47/MWP
Dwill/Jamison
Howard/Pek

That makes Hill the odd man out, unfortunately. Package him with Morris, Clark, Duhon, or whatever junk for a decent draft pick. Or we can keep him to compete with Dwill for the PF spot with Jamison likely gone next year. We can also move Pek at the end of the year for a nice piece.

I'd like to see how Pau plays with Nash first, but I'd do that deal- or close to it. No Barea and then and flip Pek for a back up PG. Start Dwight/AK47/Artest/Kobe/Nash. Dwill is back up 3 and Jamison is backup 4.

V.V.V.V.V. · by **V.V.V.V.V.** on Sun Dec 16, 2012 9:14 pm

Weezy wrote:Should we? Of course. Would Minnesota do it? Hell no.

I have the upmost admiration for the careful reader. :man12:

borri · by **borri** on Sun Dec 16, 2012 9:47 pm

V.V.V.V.V. wrote:
Weezy wrote:Should we? Of course. Would Minnesota do it? Hell no.

I have the upmost admiration for the careful reader.

We all can read your post well. We all ignored the "should" part because well....who the hell wouldn't? It's like asking us guys here...."should you have sex with Kate Upton if she asked you to?"

Better title would have been...."How Dumb Would Minny Be To Trade DWillie and Love for Pau."

odom1year · by **odom1year** on Sun Dec 16, 2012 9:54 pm

They are the future of NBA. Pau is over the hill. You think Mitch is magician ?

khmrP · by **khmrP** on Sun Dec 16, 2012 10:18 pm

borri wrote:
V.V.V.V.V. wrote:
Weezy wrote:Should we? Of course. Would Minnesota do it? Hell no.

I have the upmost admiration for the careful reader.

We all can read your post well. We all ignored the "should" part because well....who the hell wouldn't? It's like asking us guys here...."should you have sex with Kate Upton if she asked you to?"

Better title would have been...."How Dumb Would Minny Be To Trade DWillie and Love for Pau."

much better title, and yes to Upton :man13:

crampledkid · by **crampledkid** on Sun Dec 16, 2012 10:38 pm

Punk-101 wrote:No way in hell Minn gives up Love for Pau.

Just how desperate are they though to pair Pau with Rubio?

I think this trade is extremely lopsided in our favor, but maybe Minn considers if they want Pau so badly:

Pau/Blake/Ebanks

for

AK47/Dwill/Pek/Barea

That makes us a VERY deep and balanced team, esp in the MDA offense.

Nash/Barea
Kobe/Meeks
AK47/MWP
Dwill/Jamison
Howard/Pek

That makes Hill the odd man out, unfortunately. Package him with Morris, Clark, Duhon, or whatever junk for a decent draft pick. Or we can keep him to compete with Dwill for the PF spot with Jamison likely gone next year. We can also move Pek at the end of the year for a nice piece.

i like this.

Should the Lakers trade Pau for DWillie and Love?

Re: Should the Lakers trade Pau for DWillie and Love?

Re: Should the Lakers trade Pau for DWillie and Love?

Re: Should the Lakers trade Pau for DWillie and Love?

Re: Should the Lakers trade Pau for DWillie and Love?

Re: Should the Lakers trade Pau for DWillie and Love?

Re: Should the Lakers trade Pau for DWillie and Love?

Re: Should the Lakers trade Pau for DWillie and Love?

Who is online