Steve Blake Discussion: Out Indefinitely (p. 102)

Re: Steve Blake Discussion

Postby therealdeal on Wed Sep 12, 2012 9:21 am

^ I was going to say the same thing.

Not to mention his first season here he still played pretty bad. Sure, the Triangle had something to do with it, but bad is bad. He hasn't been very good here at all. In fact the term "below average" might be giving him a little too much credit.

I like him, I expect a bigger year from him, but he has a lot to prove this season. He was brought here to give us good veteran presence and as someone who could take minutes away from Fisher (possibly replace him). Let's see if he can lead a 2nd unit on a stacked team.
Stu : "Yeah, that's an old fashioned whoopin'."
therealdeal
CL Global Moderator
 
Posts: 32194
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 3:03 pm

Re: Steve Blake Discussion

Postby Ariza3 on Wed Sep 12, 2012 2:08 pm

And though Nash will likely be sitting when Blake is on the court, some combination of Kobe Bryant, Pau Gasol, Antawn Jamison or Dwight Howard will still be on floor with him.

Blake can knock down an open three-pointer and he's a decent passer, so his job will be to avoid turnovers, get the ball to Bryant, Gasol, Jamison or Howard and be ready to knock down an open shot.

If he can successfully do all the above while Nash catches a breather, Blake will have served his purpose.
User avatar
Ariza3

 
Posts: 4180
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2012 9:28 pm

Re: Steve Blake Discussion

Postby ben_ready on Thu Sep 13, 2012 4:03 pm

He's a bum that's paid well. His Columbus when it came to that contract was genius. His play well, it has been exceptionally garbage yell™
great "scott"! you're too "green", and not "worthy" enough to taste the "magic" "kareem"(cream)/You flew the "coop" "west" so don't fuss just drive the "buss"(bus),while i eat my "chick" n' "stu"(chicken stew) in the aisle,"back 2 back" with "riles" my favorite laker squad
ben_ready

 
Posts: 288
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 3:37 pm
Location: los angeles

Re: Steve Blake Discussion

Postby revgen on Sat Sep 15, 2012 6:58 pm

I have a feeling Blake is going to play better in the Princeton system than he has the last 2 seasons. He always seems to play better with guys who cut and move. Like those sequences he had with Matt Barnes the last 2 seasons.
"Every time he’s hurt, he always plays, he always comes through."

- Metta World Peace on teammate Kobe Bryant
User avatar
revgen
HDTV/Multimedia Guru
 
Posts: 20309
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 10:53 pm
Location: Southern California

Re: Steve Blake Discussion

Postby Ariza3 on Sat Sep 15, 2012 10:58 pm

blake has the court vision of a decent good point guard but not the speed or athleticism to get in the lane or draw defenders and then make the pass or create for himself. so he needs the guys hes playing with to be the athletic guys cutting and stuff. if he has that than he can be a good backup point guard for us.
User avatar
Ariza3

 
Posts: 4180
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2012 9:28 pm

Re: Steve Blake Discussion

Postby therealdeal on Fri Sep 21, 2012 6:28 pm

Steve Blake looked good for the Lakers late last season and in the playoffs, earning many of the crunch time minutes over Ramon Sessions, and earning the trust of his coaches and teammates in the process. Several assistant coaches mentioned how consistent Blake has been in workouts this summer, and noted that he played for Eddie Jordan his first two seasons in the league for Washington. That he and Jamison are familiar with Jordan’s system is a nice benefit for the Lakers.
Stu : "Yeah, that's an old fashioned whoopin'."
therealdeal
CL Global Moderator
 
Posts: 32194
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 3:03 pm

Re: Steve Blake Discussion

Postby vladefan12 on Sat Sep 22, 2012 12:04 pm

Blake will take Nash's starting role by the end of the year. His upside is limitless, and he is so much more athletic than Nash. Not to mention, he is a lock down defender. Nash will have the starting job for the first 20 games, that's it.
User avatar
vladefan12

 
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 11:51 am

Re: Steve Blake Discussion

Postby Texas Lakers Fan on Sat Sep 22, 2012 12:09 pm

vladefan12 wrote:Blake will take Nash's starting role by the end of the year. His upside is limitless, and he is so much more athletic than Nash. Not to mention, he is a lock down defender. Nash will have the starting job for the first 20 games, that's it.

:man10: :man10: :man10: :man10: :man10:
Image
User avatar
Texas Lakers Fan

 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 2:26 am

Re: Steve Blake Discussion

Postby JSM on Tue Oct 02, 2012 10:03 am

Janis Carr of the Orange County Register wrote:Steve Blake was wearing shoes at Lakers Media Day on Monday, which is a good sign.

Eight days ago, Blake suffered a puncture wound to his left foot when he stepped on a spike strip at a beach parking lot in Manhattan Beach, but should be back fully in another two weeks.

“I saw the doctor today and everything is looking great, it’s on pace,” Blake said. “I think it will heal pretty quickly.”

Blake, who was cleared to do spot shooting Monday, said he was headed to his truck in the parking lot to retrieve his cell phone when he briefly became distracted when someone called his name.

“I looked up and as I looked up, that’s when I stepped on the spike,” he said. “It’s an unfortunate situation, bad timing, but I think things always work out for the best.”

While Blake’s foot heals he will miss the early opportunity to work along side MVP point guard Steve Nash in the Lakers’ newly installed Princeton offense. Blake said the eight-time All-Star should have no difficulty picking up the new scheme.

“He’s such a good player, so talented that I think any offense there is, he will do great in,” said Blake, who will back up Nash. “It’s a little bit of a learning curve for everybody. He’s been in Phoenix for quite a long time, so I think it will be an adjustment. But, great players like himself pick things up pretty quickly.”

Blake said he doesn’t think the Lakers will be under any additional pressure this season with Dwight Howard and Nash on the roster. Many are picking the star-studded Lakers to win 70 games and take home the NBA championship.

“The pressure the past two years has been the same. It’s all about winning and winning big,” Blake said. “It’s no different than any other season except for a couple different faces — and we’re very glad to have those faces, that’s for sure.”
User avatar
JSM
ClubLakers.com Administrator
 
Posts: 92649
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2003 3:40 pm
Location: Atlanta

Re: Steve Blake Discussion

Postby wcsoldier81 on Tue Oct 02, 2012 10:11 pm

Meeks has a reputation as a pure shooter, but the Lakers may ask for him to do more than just hit the open looks that will naturally come his way.

“I’m going to be asked to guard the point guards a lot,” Meeks said. “I’m still young and I’m still quick and youthful. If they need me to do that a lot, I’ll do that


http://www.hoopsworld.com/the-la-lakers-cant-win-on-paper

So Blake still may guard the opponent SG ... I hope not
wcsoldier81

 
Posts: 4927
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:20 am

Re: Steve Blake Discussion

Postby XXIV on Tue Oct 02, 2012 10:24 pm

^ Mike Brown is suppose to be a defensive genius but having Blake guard the SG spot last season was really painful to watch. Let's hope he learned his lesson and will never/rarely use a two point guard lineup again.
XXIV

 
Posts: 5502
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2010 11:20 am
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Steve Blake Discussion

Postby wcsoldier81 on Tue Oct 02, 2012 10:46 pm

On second thoughts, Meeks may see time with the 1st unit , defend the PG so we can hide Nash defensively when the opponent SG isn't a big offensive threat and Ko is at the 3 ... that's a possibility too since this lineup makes sense offensively ... I hope that's what the coaching staff envisions here
wcsoldier81

 
Posts: 4927
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:20 am

Re: Steve Blake Discussion

Postby KB24 on Wed Oct 03, 2012 3:33 am

How long before we can take a deep breath after getting rid of Luke's successor.
Image

"It is not how big you are, it is how big you play"
"Basketball doesn't build character. It reveals it"
"Be strong in body, clean in mind, lofty in ideals"
User avatar
KB24
Site Admin
 
Posts: 55204
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2004 10:56 pm
Location: In Heaven

Re: Steve Blake Discussion

Postby lakersyunowin on Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:31 am

i dunno, but when that happens i'll need a new name again
the artist formerly known as fklukewalton, fksteveblake, and fkmikebrown
User avatar
lakersyunowin

 
Posts: 9374
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 7:19 pm

Re: Steve Blake Discussion

Postby davriver290 on Wed Oct 03, 2012 1:07 pm

Lol Steve really gets a lot of crap on this forum. Despite frustrating moments from Blake, he has done exceptionally well. He plays decent defense. He can stroke it. He is overpayed. But he comes and does what he was brought to do. He also looked worse before because of our god awful bench. Even Matt Barnes (who is not bad) looked awful.
Sessions, Kobe, Metta, Gasol, Bynum
User avatar
davriver290

 
Posts: 5464
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 3:14 pm

Re: Steve Blake Discussion

Postby therealdeal on Wed Oct 03, 2012 1:36 pm

davriver290 wrote:Lol Steve really gets a lot of crap on this forum. Despite frustrating moments from Blake, he has done exceptionally well. He plays decent defense. He can stroke it. He is overpayed. But he comes and does what he was brought to do. He also looked worse before because of our god awful bench. Even Matt Barnes (who is not bad) looked awful.

Exceptionally well is pushing it dav. :man10:

He's been adequate and that's what worries people about him. He hasn't shown the promise or ability to be more than that. I think this season if he can stop stepping on sharp objects he can be alright. Most people aren't happy with alright, but I know we can't expect good-great from EVERY position and some of them are just going to be alright. :man10:
Stu : "Yeah, that's an old fashioned whoopin'."
therealdeal
CL Global Moderator
 
Posts: 32194
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 3:03 pm

Re: Steve Blake Discussion

Postby davriver290 on Wed Oct 03, 2012 2:00 pm

I think exceptional is a good word for him. He hasn't been awful but by no means amazing. He's average, and I think that's what we should expect from him. In his Blazers day he was what he is today. Spot up shooter, dribble up the court and make nice crisp passes.
Sessions, Kobe, Metta, Gasol, Bynum
User avatar
davriver290

 
Posts: 5464
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 3:14 pm

Re: Steve Blake Discussion

Postby therealdeal on Wed Oct 03, 2012 2:31 pm

davriver290 wrote:I think exceptional is a good word for him. He hasn't been awful but by no means amazing. He's average, and I think that's what we should expect from him. In his Blazers day he was what he is today. Spot up shooter, dribble up the court and make nice crisp passes.

The word exceptional means unusually great or outstanding. :man3:
Stu : "Yeah, that's an old fashioned whoopin'."
therealdeal
CL Global Moderator
 
Posts: 32194
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 3:03 pm

Re: Steve Blake Discussion

Postby lakerfan2 on Wed Oct 03, 2012 2:50 pm

KB24 wrote:How long before we can take a deep breath after getting rid of Luke's successor.


George > Cook > Radman > Luke > Blake
"we just want to win now...and that's our only goal, is to win. everything else comes second" - d. howard
User avatar
lakerfan2

 
Posts: 7896
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 5:23 pm

Re: Steve Blake Discussion

Postby Lakerjones on Wed Oct 03, 2012 2:54 pm

therealdeal wrote:
davriver290 wrote:I think exceptional is a good word for him. He hasn't been awful but by no means amazing. He's average, and I think that's what we should expect from him. In his Blazers day he was what he is today. Spot up shooter, dribble up the court and make nice crisp passes.

The word exceptional means unusually great or outstanding. :man3:


Yep, I was confused by your use of the term as well. Exceptional means exceeding expectations. To me he still hasn't lived up to fairly modest expectations. That's not exceptional. That's below acceptable. Basically Exceptional = A grade. I think you were looking for "acceptable." Acceptable = C grade.

But to me he's lower than that so far as a Laker. I'd give him a C minus. Not failing, not horrible, but wildly inconsistent in his play and being a solid backup point guard should have been a NO-BRAINER for Steve Blake. He hasn't come close to giving us the stable play that has been his calling card for his career in the league.

I do truly hope he'll turn it around this year. We shall see. I have l defended his performance and ability before but I won't do it any longer.
Lakerjones

 
Posts: 12977
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 12:37 am

Re: Steve Blake Discussion

Postby davriver290 on Wed Oct 03, 2012 3:04 pm

Forgive my vocabulary guys lol. That's what I mean, he's been alright. What else do you expect from Steve Blake?
Sessions, Kobe, Metta, Gasol, Bynum
User avatar
davriver290

 
Posts: 5464
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 3:14 pm

Re: Steve Blake Discussion

Postby Doc Brown on Wed Oct 03, 2012 3:06 pm

davriver290 wrote:Forgive my vocabulary guys lol. That's what I mean, he's been alright. What else do you expect from Steve Blake?


I expect him to to step up and over a spike strip, but I was sadly disappointed.
Rule of Thumb at ClubLakers - Never encourage people to check your post history.
User avatar
Doc Brown

 
Posts: 15025
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 10:11 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Steve Blake Discussion

Postby Lakerjones on Wed Oct 03, 2012 3:07 pm

davriver290 wrote:Forgive my vocabulary guys lol. That's what I mean, he's been alright. What else do you expect from Steve Blake?


^^ Cool. :man10: Yeah, he's been decent, but to me he's been too inconsistent. I want him to step it up a little and really hold it down with the second unit. On the plus side at least he'll have a talented backup shooting guard to work with this year in Meeks. He should also be able to set things up for Jamison. This is the season he really needs to show what he's capable of. If so the past is water under the bridge. But if not, he should be gone next year.
Lakerjones

 
Posts: 12977
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 12:37 am

Re: Steve Blake Discussion

Postby therealdeal on Wed Oct 03, 2012 3:29 pm

Lakerjones wrote:
davriver290 wrote:Forgive my vocabulary guys lol. That's what I mean, he's been alright. What else do you expect from Steve Blake?


^^ Cool. :man10: Yeah, he's been decent, but to me he's been too inconsistent. I want him to step it up a little and really hold it down with the second unit. On the plus side at least he'll have a talented backup shooting guard to work with this year in Meeks. He should also be able to set things up for Jamison. This is the season he really needs to show what he's capable of. If so the past is water under the bridge. But if not, he should be gone next year.

Yeah, I'm just hoping for 2 threes a night and 3 assists and that'd be the best I could expect from him. Some solid defense maybe. He won't be asked to do too much in the Princeton, so that's nice. Hopefully he can lead a fast break or two.
Stu : "Yeah, that's an old fashioned whoopin'."
therealdeal
CL Global Moderator
 
Posts: 32194
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 3:03 pm

Re: Steve Blake Discussion

Postby BigDan24 on Thu Oct 04, 2012 6:31 am

Doc Brown wrote:
davriver290 wrote:Forgive my vocabulary guys lol. That's what I mean, he's been alright. What else do you expect from Steve Blake?


I expect him to to step up and over a spike strip, but I was sadly disappointed.


:man10:
Image
User avatar
BigDan24

 
Posts: 1368
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 1:05 pm
Location: Bonn, Germany

PreviousNext

Return to Lakers Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bigdog2013, Exabot [Bot], slimjim, TIME, XXIV and 20 guests

cron
Advertise Here | Privacy Policy | ©2008 Sculu Sports. Come Strong.