Snakell Beast wrote:
RetroNikes wrote:It's not about a disagreement, it's about you not making any sense.
You can disagree with my prediction about the level of value Nash adds to the team when he comes back, but to say I am not making any sense is not only an unnecessarily insulting thing to say, it also completely misrepresents the situation.
YOU might think it makes no sense for me to say that age and offensive role, when combined with an ADMITTEDLY slow recovery from a very painful and serious structural injury, should cause a drop in FG%... but I believe it to be true. If you can point me to some statistical analysis that conclusively disproves my contention, or some data that at least shows a statistically significant trend in favor of your argument, then I might change my perception...otherwise, it will continue to be my opinion...regardless of your insults.
There have been a number of players (including other athletes like Michael Phelps) who have improved their shooting or playing technique while rehabbing from injury. But it is also true that it takes time to "get back in the groove," so my impression is that he might not be very effective until after playing for a while.. maybe a month or so?