
Ariza3 wrote:CDR went for 49pts/8ast/7rb. wow.
trodgers wrote:Anyone interested in....
eWINS?!?!?!
Lakers: 7-3
I miss that guy.Ariza3 wrote:CDR went for 49pts/8ast/7rb. wow.

Alcindor wrote:Ariza3 wrote:CDR went for 49pts/8ast/7rb. wow.
can't believe we kept Ebanks and let this guy go

Lakerjones wrote:I thought the offense looked a lot better against the Rockets than the game before against the Suns. It looked less forced somehow. Maybe they're just getting used to the uptempo more. It was flowing this game.
Oh yeah, and we're finally .500!!
Alcindor wrote:Ariza3 wrote:CDR went for 49pts/8ast/7rb. wow.
can't believe we kept Ebanks and let this guy go

kenzo wrote:Alcindor wrote:Ariza3 wrote:CDR went for 49pts/8ast/7rb. wow.
can't believe we kept Ebanks and let this guy go
Blame is on Brown for this one. 100%
Doc Brown wrote:I think the only mistake on Brown's part with the whole CDR was not giving him more run, when it both practice (reported) and game, he was doing really well.
lakerswiz wrote:I could see that.
But at the same time, front office chose Darius Johnson Odom over him, who we saw even less of during preseason.
Blaming Brown for this one is just over the top silly.
Doc Brown wrote:No I agree with you LJ and I agree with Wiz. They already invested 500k in DJO before he was even on the team. It was basically a guaranteed deal for him money wise.
Overall it was a matter of too many guaranteed deals and not enough room. IMO if everyone (Blake/Duhon/Morris/Ebanks/Clark) had non-guaranteed deals like Glock/CDR, our roster would look a little different. It is what it is.
Ohh well we are putting up ridiculous offensive numbers right now and winning. Can't really complain.
fkmikebrown wrote:missed like a gajillion free throws and still won
defense was really good when it mattered
over 0.500 now


Users browsing this forum: banners, Google [Bot], karacha, MSNbot Media, TIME and 18 guests