What was Mitch thinking choosing Nash over Sessions

Re: What was Mitch thinking choosing Nash over Sessions

Postby lakers_09tv on Mon Jan 21, 2013 10:55 pm

Weezy wrote:
lakers_09tv wrote:
Armani wrote:
lakers_09tv wrote:Not even close to the Lakers biggest mistake.

Hiring Pringles over Phil Jackson
Hiring Mike Brown
Selling draft picks for cash
Trading our youth for players 30 and over
Not signing Delonte West, Barbosa etc.
Not getting any athletic players wing players

Both Mitch and Jim Buss are overrated.


I am guessing you saw it coming. Please point to your post before this season started that says you saw this coming. :man10:

This was unpredictable. NO ONE saw it coming.

Look at my post history over the years. I've always said these things.

And no I didn't expect us to be this bad. No one did.


Congratulations your pessimism was finally right? :man3: :man10:

They weren't smart decisions by the Lakers front office and I ways always vocal about it. I never understood how no one else saw it that way.

Why did the Suns fall off? They sold their draft picks and traded away their youth for old non-athletic players. We were doing the same things they did. We top it all off by hiring the same coach they had.
Image
Matt Barnes - "I respect all my opponents but I fear no one."

Deron Williams - “I hate ’em, you know,” he said the other day. “I hate the Lakers. They’re so good. I hate them because they win all the time. They’re a tough team. … We definitely talk about it. It’s not a secret. We hate the Lakers.”
User avatar
lakers_09tv

 
Posts: 5798
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 12:30 pm

Re: What was Mitch thinking choosing Nash over Sessions

Postby Weezy on Mon Jan 21, 2013 10:59 pm

I get it, it's just funny to me because if you harp on every single thing the FO does as bad eventually you will be right at some point because every single team goes through a down time. It's not like by complaining for years and years and years even when we're good and winning titles makes you smart when we do start sucking, it was bound to happen no matter what the FO did.
User avatar
Weezy
CL Global Moderator
 
Posts: 50866
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 11:14 am
Location: Anaheim, CA

Re: What was Mitch thinking choosing Nash over Sessions

Postby Vlade_12 on Mon Jan 21, 2013 11:10 pm

we could have won 4 to 5 years straight if management didnt get cheap after winning the ring in 2009

People forget we owned Arizas bird right and we could have landed him and MWP
Howard Gasol
Clark Hill
MWP
Kobe Meeks
Nash Duhon
Playoff rotation! Bring Casspi or Ariza back home for a Title Run Mitch!!!
Vlade_12

 
Posts: 144
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 12:43 pm

Re: What was Mitch thinking choosing Nash over Sessions

Postby odom1year on Mon Jan 21, 2013 11:13 pm

Nash's weakness in defense is a well known issue. No complain here please.
odom1year

 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 9:33 pm

Re: What was Mitch thinking choosing Nash over Sessions

Postby Weezy on Mon Jan 21, 2013 11:13 pm

Vlade_12 wrote:we could have won 4 to 5 years straight if management didnt get cheap after winning the ring in 2009

People forget we owned Arizas bird right and we could have landed him and MWP


Nobody wins 4 or 5 years straight, it just doesn't happen. Teams get too tired after 3, that seems to be the limit, it's just not realistic. Also, management didn't get cheap, we won again in 2010 with what they put together, moves are made that don't always work out, doesn't make them cheap.
User avatar
Weezy
CL Global Moderator
 
Posts: 50866
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 11:14 am
Location: Anaheim, CA

Re: What was Mitch thinking choosing Nash over Sessions

Postby JGC on Mon Jan 21, 2013 11:15 pm

This thread actually sucks harder than the lakers. That says a lot. How are you allowed to do this time and time again?
JGC

 
Posts: 3781
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 9:07 am

Re: What was Mitch thinking choosing Nash over Sessions

Postby kblo247 on Mon Jan 21, 2013 11:16 pm

That his boss wanted him
Image
User avatar
kblo247

 
Posts: 1114
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 11:38 pm

Re: What was Mitch thinking choosing Nash over Sessions

Postby Weezy on Mon Jan 21, 2013 11:20 pm

JGC wrote:This thread actually sucks harder than the lakers. That says a lot. How are you allowed to do this time and time again?



I'm actually going to agree, a thread the other day about Nash 'sucking' was locked, and this topic is going nowhere. Mainly though, Mitch didn't CHOOSE Nash over Sessions, Sessions left to start elsewhere, probably to get away from Mike Brown.
User avatar
Weezy
CL Global Moderator
 
Posts: 50866
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 11:14 am
Location: Anaheim, CA

Previous

Return to Lakers Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], LAKEROC and 10 guests

cron
Advertise Here | Privacy Policy | ©2008 Sculu Sports. Come Strong.