knm131 wrote:leftymo wrote:two0one7 wrote:
So you're no longer a Laker fan because of one poor game. Got it.
typo, meant to write Houston. (instead of anyone)
But tell me one thing. Why can't you keep this on the Lakers? Answer that.
If you're so concerned about keeping this on the Lakers, why did you write a post "3 more for Houston"?
I don't see how that's at ALL related to the Lakers, especially from someone so concerned about keeping the thread about the Lakers.
shehatesme wrote:I hope Manchester United wins or get a draw tomorrow so they can get to the ECL final. lol that's the only thing to look forward to now.
OCLakersFan247 wrote:leftymo-you keep ignoring my posts and i think i know why. you just keep giving adding negative posts...whats the deal? too busy making yourself cry over this loss?
leftmyo wrote:knm131 wrote:If you're so concerned about keeping this on the Lakers, why did you write a post "3 more for Houston"?
I don't see how that's at ALL related to the Lakers, especially from someone so concerned about keeping the thread about the Lakers.
knm can't read either eh? 3 more for Houston is the wakeup call that the Lakers aren't in control of this series. They've lost homecourt and don't play defense. Losing game 1 was a bad defeat. It's not like losing game 3...
OCLakersFan247 wrote:leftymo-you keep ignoring my posts and i think i know why. you just keep giving adding negative posts...whats the deal? too busy making yourself cry over this loss?
MrAdam wrote:OCLakersFan247 wrote:leftymo-you keep ignoring my posts and i think i know why. you just keep giving adding negative posts...whats the deal? too busy making yourself cry over this loss?
His takes on The Lakers have been some of the most sensible on this forum all year. Everything he's said tonight's been echoed in previous gameday posts.
Let the man state his case.
leftymo wrote:OCLakersFan247 wrote:leftymo-you keep ignoring my posts and i think i know why. you just keep giving adding negative posts...whats the deal? too busy making yourself cry over this loss?
Maybe the Lakers can win one in Houston to try and salvage this series.
knm131 wrote:leftmyo wrote:knm131 wrote:If you're so concerned about keeping this on the Lakers, why did you write a post "3 more for Houston"?
I don't see how that's at ALL related to the Lakers, especially from someone so concerned about keeping the thread about the Lakers.
knm can't read either eh? 3 more for Houston is the wakeup call that the Lakers aren't in control of this series. They've lost homecourt and don't play defense. Losing game 1 was a bad defeat. It's not like losing game 3...
Let's keep the topic about the Lakers though. Thanks!
postaboy wrote:let's hope the hawks whoop the cavs tomorrow
MrAdam wrote:OCLakersFan247 wrote:leftymo-you keep ignoring my posts and i think i know why. you just keep giving adding negative posts...whats the deal? too busy making yourself cry over this loss?
His takes on The Lakers have been some of the most sensible on this forum all year. Everything he's said tonight's been echoed in previous gameday posts.
Let the man state his case.
knm131 wrote:MrAdam wrote:OCLakersFan247 wrote:leftymo-you keep ignoring my posts and i think i know why. you just keep giving adding negative posts...whats the deal? too busy making yourself cry over this loss?
His takes on The Lakers have been some of the most sensible on this forum all year. Everything he's said tonight's been echoed in previous gameday posts.
Let the man state his case.
If by sensible you mean laughable, then I concur 100%.
He also said he wouldn't win 50 games last season.
OCLakersFan247 wrote:MrAdam wrote:OCLakersFan247 wrote:leftymo-you keep ignoring my posts and i think i know why. you just keep giving adding negative posts...whats the deal? too busy making yourself cry over this loss?
His takes on The Lakers have been some of the most sensible on this forum all year. Everything he's said tonight's been echoed in previous gameday posts.
Let the man state his case.
I'm not saying he can't state his case. I'm asking himw hy he has to bomb the forum wtih extremely negative posts. We just lost a game and everyone is down and no one wants to keep hearing negative things about the lakers. im not saying he has to sugar coat the loss. we lost, we payed badly. lets move on. why do we needa see stats about how the lakers r 6-8 when they go down 0-1? Thats common sense..how many teams in the NBA are above .500 whent ehy lose the first game in a series? probably not that many. Emotins are at teh highest after a loss especially on this board. half the bandwagonw ill leave tonight only to return after game 2. you can bet my life on that. Everyone here knows the lakers played poorly...from kobe to sasha...everyone played badly and came out flat. My issue with his posts? he is giving up on a team that he seems to say he cares about and loves to watch. its disheartening as another laker fan seeing another fan give up so easily (and yes this is QUITE easily the quickest ive seen anyone give up). Why do we need those type of comments around after a loss? Tell me that. Why? wat value does it add? Just like bias comments like oh well be aite lakers in 4 for the rest of the playoffs. those r ignorant posts too. im asking people to have a level head for ONCE after aloss. i do this every time we lose and it never seems to change.
leftymo wrote:postaboy wrote:let's hope the hawks whoop the cavs tomorrow
not happening.
cavs play defense.
last year's NBA champs won game 1 every time.
leftymo wrote:cataclismic proportions (if that's even a word!)


lalfan wrote:leftymo wrote:postaboy wrote:let's hope the hawks whoop the cavs tomorrow
not happening.
cavs play defense.
last year's NBA champs won game 1 every time.
exactly, offense comes and goes but defense is always there even when your shots not falling. we definitely could use a solid defensive effort tonite. but mentioning defense and phil jackson in the same sentence just makes want to puke.
leftymo wrote:
knm can't read either eh? 3 more for Houston is the wakeup call that the Lakers aren't in control of this series. They've lost homecourt and don't play defense. Losing game 1 was a bad defeat. It's not like losing game 3...
leftymo wrote:
I added stats that don't look too good, but its only one game. LA did overcome Philly in 2001 after a long hiatus.
8+24= Magic wrote:Lets go Dodgers!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests