




Uncle_Meat wrote:Kobe 7 turnovers? Sum ting wong...

lakers_09tv wrote:Why we didn't try to sign Redd?




lakers_09tv wrote:Uncle_Meat wrote:Kobe 7 turnovers? Sum ting wong...
Thats not even his high for the season.



karacha wrote:Only down by 15. We're winning this now.

snackdaddy wrote:Losing tonight should not come as a surprise. Its a road game for one and they won 3 in a row for two. They can't put together games with any kind of consistency. I don't get the game where I'm at, but I did notice a big discrepancy in free throws.
I still think we're gonna be on the bad end of calls from now on. Connect the dots. The Lakers success was a major topic when owners talked during the lockout. They don't want teams like the Lakers winning year after year. They want parity.
Reading what Tim Donaghy said about the NBA's memos to refs, with suttle hints on how to ref games, I'll bet the memo was clear the Lakers can no longer be a dynasty.

snackdaddy wrote:Losing tonight should not come as a surprise. Its a road game for one and they won 3 in a row for two. They can't put together games with any kind of consistency. I don't get the game where I'm at, but I did notice a big discrepancy in free throws.
I still think we're gonna be on the bad end of calls from now on. Connect the dots. The Lakers success was a major topic when owners talked during the lockout. They don't want teams like the Lakers winning year after year. They want parity.
Reading what Tim Donaghy said about the NBA's memos to refs, with suttle hints on how to ref games, I'll bet the memo was clear the Lakers can no longer be a dynasty.
Rooscooter wrote:bruddahmanmatt wrote:The numbers say otherwise, and the eye test would seem to support this as well. MWP doesn't need to work nearly as hard to get himself open because teams constantly double off of him since he sucks and yet he can't even hit wide open shots. Barnes' activity at the very least keeps the defense a bit more honest. You're cherry picking and looking at one game when we both know that if we were forced to pick between the two, Matt would be the obvious choice. That decision is made even easier when you take their contracts into account as well.
Why are we arguing about two scrubs?...... On any given day one might stink a little less than the other. The fact is, at this point, neither is a starter and on a lot of teams neither would even get playing time.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest