8kobe0mvp wrote:parker should start. mckie does not worth $2mil.

FabFourLakers wrote:yea i still dont understand the logic of using half our MLE on mckie when we coulda used the full MLE to sign DA...i was against signing DA for the full MLE bcuz i thot we could get 2 players by splitting the MLE...but this really confuses me...all we got with our MLE was mckie...oh well..i like Mckie but hes not worth 2.5 mil and he never was...i really thot we'd sign him for the LLE...


shakin wrote:One thing is for sure, the Lakers don't have 3 point shooters. Kobe is adequate, Lamar can hit occasionally, Smush probably can knock them down if open... JJ can be effective, but they don't a Kerr/Paxson type of guy that usually helps the triangle out.
The Kobe Era 2K5 wrote:Don't lynch Aaron too much... One weak game and ya'll think that he's crap. Relax, it's only pre-season and McKie is experienced player, so he will be different payer in next games.
Kobe and Lamar didn't played much, so we lost by so many and I think the main reason for so big loss was poor shooting.

mandingo wrote:FabFourLakers wrote:yea i still dont understand the logic of using half our MLE on mckie when we coulda used the full MLE to sign DA...i was against signing DA for the full MLE bcuz i thot we could get 2 players by splitting the MLE...but this really confuses me...all we got with our MLE was mckie...oh well..i like Mckie but hes not worth 2.5 mil and he never was...i really thot we'd sign him for the LLE...
The logic is this. DA wanted more than a 2 year contract. End of story, bottom line. That's why we didn't sign Antonio Daniels either...
Savory Griddles wrote:mandingo wrote:FabFourLakers wrote:yea i still dont understand the logic of using half our MLE on mckie when we coulda used the full MLE to sign DA...i was against signing DA for the full MLE bcuz i thot we could get 2 players by splitting the MLE...but this really confuses me...all we got with our MLE was mckie...oh well..i like Mckie but hes not worth 2.5 mil and he never was...i really thot we'd sign him for the LLE...
The logic is this. DA wanted more than a 2 year contract. End of story, bottom line. That's why we didn't sign Antonio Daniels either...
You're actually wrong about that. DA only wanted a two year deal. His agent said it, he said it, and that's what he signed for with Houston.
We should have used the MLE on Spree and the LLE on McKie. Everyone would have been happy and we would have a backcourt that isn't paper thin. Oh well.
KB8@CL wrote:McKie has excellent stats.
ZERO points, steals, blocks, rebounds, assists, made field goals
2 fouls, 1 TO and 2 missed shots![]()
Lamar with only 4 points![]()
Lakers 3-26 in 2 games from the three point line.
DarthRekal wrote:iWuVkObE8BrYaNT wrote:no!
dont say that!
this'll be my very first time goin to a lakers game..
they have to win!!!!!!!!!
win one for WUVLY!


(but was followed up by Kwame). On D, his lateral movement and activity is decent but, communication, switching, was horrible. Like I said Dunleavy was shooting wide open 3-pt set shots. Scottie PLEASE stay full time Lamar and the Laker Nation needs you!
). He was horrible with the ball in the post with the exception of one jump hook in the baseline. As a passer in the top of the key or the top of the triangle (the old Luc Longley role) he was telegraphing his passes and he looked nervous and indecisive with the ball. He dropped another pass that could have been an easy dunk (deja vu). It's hard to believe this guy has triangle experience. His highlight of the night was a nice tip in basket in the 3rd qtr.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests