tsd wrote:Andrew Bynum is not a team player. He chose a vacation over surgery and rehab. Let's get rid him before he becomes a lesser-talented Sam Bowie!
therealdeal wrote:Wow that's dumb.
edit : The reasoning, not the idea.
ZenMaster4President wrote:therealdeal wrote:Wow that's dumb.
edit : The reasoning, not the idea.
Sorry, real. It's all dumb.
ZenMaster4President wrote:therealdeal wrote:Wow that's dumb.
edit : The reasoning, not the idea.
Sorry, real. It's all dumb.
Good call.Phil XI wrote:How about Bynum for 22 mil and a 2011 1st rdr between 4 and 14?
Phil XI wrote:Funny you focused on the draft pick. That was just the filler. The carrot was immediate 22mil savings for Dr Buss. That might get his attention, perhaps even MORE than a superstar who will cost him way more than Bynum + 22m.
ZenMaster4President wrote:Phil XI wrote:Funny you focused on the draft pick. That was just the filler. The carrot was immediate 22mil savings for Dr Buss. That might get his attention, perhaps even MORE than a superstar who will cost him way more than Bynum + 22m.
OK. And what is your solution to our thin front court then? Bass saves 22 millions (let's pretend it's the correct number and it's actually possible under the CBA - this stuff is of no importance now), then what? Pau playing 45 minutes a night?
Would you care to elaborate on your plan, please?
nameant wrote:Bynum's career has already trumped Bowie's. Kid has 2 rings and his injury was the reason we don't have 3. Nice try tho.
Phil XI wrote:Well it is actually CBA friendly since two teams have TPEs large enough.
And for the calculation, 13.7 avoid tax plus 8+ remaining salary owed.

Geovany44 wrote:It will never happen. Bynum will always be a Laker it's to risky to trade him.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest