Should the Lakers of Traded the 29th for cash?

TKainZero · by **TKainZero** on Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:24 pm

Was it the best choice?
Some good players fell that could have been nice players.

What do you think?

Pig Miller · by **Pig Miller** on Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:31 pm

yes, it was the best choice

TKainZero · by **TKainZero** on Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:47 pm

I think there were still some decent players on the board.

The money is nice, but the Lakers need to get some young pieces, and do not have a first rounder next year

Kobe Bryant 8 · by **Kobe Bryant 8** on Thu Jun 25, 2009 8:17 pm

Lets see...

Unproven rookie or a better chance to retain key pieces to a title winning team.

Choose.

SignPippenNow · by **SignPippenNow** on Thu Jun 25, 2009 8:44 pm

Kobe Bryant 8 wrote:Lets see...

Unproven rookie or a better chance to retain key pieces to a title winning team.

Choose.

If Odom walks then this won't look nearly as cut and dried.

strikemode14 · by **strikemode14** on Thu Jun 25, 2009 9:35 pm

viewtopic.php?f=30&t=113020

Should the Lakers of Traded the 29th for cash?

Should the Lakers of Traded the 29th for cash?

Re: Should the Lakers of Traded the 29th for cash?

Re: Should the Lakers of Traded the 29th for cash?

Re: Should the Lakers of Traded the 29th for cash?

Re: Should the Lakers of Traded the 29th for cash?

Re: Should the Lakers of Traded the 29th for cash?

Who is online