Darius Morris Discussion

Re: Darius Morris signs QO to stay a Laker - pg 4

Postby Rooscooter on Mon Jul 02, 2012 9:23 pm

^^"on paper".... you have a bench led by low second round picks that would otherwise be out of the league.....

Kobe F***ing Bryant or not..... that team would kill Kobe, Pau and Andrew..... they'd have to play 46 minutes a game apiece to even make the playoffs IMO.....

You seem to WAY overvalue our recent draft picks..... These guys have proved absolutely nothing in this league and some barely cut it in the D-League.... To put it in perspective.... If we had Smush on the bench he'd be our sixth man in that group..... and it wouldn't be that close....
"If the past sits in judgment on the present, the future will be lost." Winston Churchill

“The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present - and is gravely to be regarded." Dwight Eisenhower

"Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it" Thomas Sowell
User avatar
Rooscooter

 
Posts: 23106
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 4:25 pm
Location: Chandler AZ and Andalué

Re: Darius Morris signs QO to stay a Laker - pg 4

Postby therealdeal on Mon Jul 02, 2012 9:54 pm

Wow i don't agree with that at all. Parker was garbage. He was so bad he didn't even make it in a 2nd rate Chinese team.

I know you hate Ebanks, but i don't know why. He proved he can be every bit as effective as Barnes and for a cheap contract he's a good fit. He provides athleticism and a developong midrange game to go along with good defensive instincts.

Gouelock is a good scorer and McRoberts is a decent backup as is Hill. Again, i didn't say great i aaid pretty gpodand i stand by that. I never claimed they'd be champions.
Stu : "Yeah, that's an old fashioned whoopin'."
therealdeal
CL Global Moderator
 
Posts: 40322
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 3:03 pm

Re: Darius Morris signs QO to stay a Laker - pg 4

Postby John3:16 on Mon Jul 02, 2012 10:09 pm

He's perfect for our bench. By "perfect" I mean, he fits right in, because the rest of them can't shoot either and have no business getting PT in the playoffs.
Image
User avatar
John3:16
CL Global Moderator
 
Posts: 31869
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 12:23 am
Location: Anywhere but LD after a loss.

Re: Darius Morris signs QO to stay a Laker - pg 4

Postby Helljumper on Mon Jul 02, 2012 11:09 pm

therealdeal wrote:Wow i don't agree with that at all. Parker was garbage. He was so bad he didn't even make it in a 2nd rate Chinese team.

I know you hate Ebanks, but i don't know why. He proved he can be every bit as effective as Barnes and for a cheap contract he's a good fit. He provides athleticism and a developong midrange game to go along with good defensive instincts.

Gouelock is a good scorer and McRoberts is a decent backup as is Hill. Again, i didn't say great i aaid pretty gpodand i stand by that. I never claimed they'd be champions.


Bolded the only statements I agree with.
Image
User avatar
Helljumper

 
Posts: 14879
Joined: Fri May 14, 2004 4:40 pm
Location: Riverside, CA

Re: Darius Morris signs QO to stay a Laker - pg 4

Postby therealdeal on Mon Jul 02, 2012 11:47 pm

Helljumper wrote:
therealdeal wrote:Wow i don't agree with that at all. Parker was garbage. He was so bad he didn't even make it in a 2nd rate Chinese team.

I know you hate Ebanks, but i don't know why. He proved he can be every bit as effective as Barnes and for a cheap contract he's a good fit. He provides athleticism and a developong midrange game to go along with good defensive instincts.

Gouelock is a good scorer and McRoberts is a decent backup as is Hill. Again, i didn't say great i aaid pretty gpodand i stand by that. I never claimed they'd be champions.


Bolded the only statements I agree with.


You disagree that Ebanks can be as effective as Barnes? The same Barnes that averaged 3.5 points and 3.3 rebounds in the playoffs along with shooting 27% overall and 16% from deep? You don't think Ebanks can do that?

I think he, along with most of the league, can do a lot more. The difference is that Ebanks can be had for cheap while a replacement would be more costly.
Stu : "Yeah, that's an old fashioned whoopin'."
therealdeal
CL Global Moderator
 
Posts: 40322
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 3:03 pm

Re: Darius Morris signs QO to stay a Laker - pg 4

Postby wcsoldier81 on Tue Jul 03, 2012 12:00 am

As of now , only Hill is a good bench player , with Glock having the potential to be a good one if he gets more PT ( and the only bench player who can score to save his live) ...

Our bench was last in PPG last season , and TOP 5 worst in general .

-I don't even know why we kept Morris ... he belongs in the D-League
- Ebanks will have a good game every 6-7 games , most of the time he's Casper on the floor
- McRoberts only had good games against bad/average teams .

This bench makes Laker fans wish our team still had the likes of Vujacic/Farmar/Brown
wcsoldier81

 
Posts: 6420
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:20 am

Re: Darius Morris signs QO to stay a Laker - pg 4

Postby Rooscooter on Tue Jul 03, 2012 12:00 am

therealdeal wrote:Wow i don't agree with that at all. Parker was garbage. He was so bad he didn't even make it in a 2nd rate Chinese team.

I know you hate Ebanks, but i don't know why. He proved he can be every bit as effective as Barnes and for a cheap contract he's a good fit. He provides athleticism and a developong midrange game to go along with good defensive instincts.

Gouelock is a good scorer and McRoberts is a decent backup as is Hill. Again, i didn't say great i aaid pretty gpodand i stand by that. I never claimed they'd be champions.


First... I don't "hate" anyone.......

Second, what does Barnes have to do with Ebanks?

Of the players you listed only one has played any "real" NBA minutes on a team that matters.

Finally... How many of those guys would even make any other team? I'll bet none would get a roster spot on Denver with the exception of McRoberts.....

Our bench is a huge mess......no way around that...
"If the past sits in judgment on the present, the future will be lost." Winston Churchill

“The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present - and is gravely to be regarded." Dwight Eisenhower

"Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it" Thomas Sowell
User avatar
Rooscooter

 
Posts: 23106
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 4:25 pm
Location: Chandler AZ and Andalué

Re: Darius Morris signs QO to stay a Laker - pg 4

Postby Texas Lakers Fan on Tue Jul 03, 2012 12:04 am

Our bench sucks, but fixing isn't very hard. First and foremost resign Jordan Hill. Trade Pau to Minny for Beasley, Williams, and Barea. Two of those three guys will come off the bench. That alone vastly improves our bench. We'd still have the mini MLE to go get another guy like Jason Terry. I think Terry at this stage of his career is chasing rings not money. I think he'd take a paycut. I'd start Williams and bring Beasley off the bench. I'd also resign Ebanks

New bench - JJ Barea, Jason Terry, Devin Ebanks, Michael Beasley, & Jordan Hill.

Best bench in the league imo.
Image
User avatar
Texas Lakers Fan

 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 2:26 am

Re: Darius Morris signs QO to stay a Laker - pg 4

Postby wcsoldier81 on Tue Jul 03, 2012 12:15 am

KeepBynum wrote:Our bench sucks, but fixing isn't very hard. First and foremost resign Jordan Hill. Trade Pau to Minny for Beasley, Williams, and Barea. Two of those three guys will come off the bench. That alone vastly improves our bench. We'd still have the mini MLE to go get another guy like Jason Terry. I think Terry at this stage of his career is chasing rings not money. I think he'd take a paycut. I'd start Williams and bring Beasley off the bench. I'd also resign Ebanks

New bench - JJ Barea, Jason Terry, Devin Ebanks, Michael Beasley, & Jordan Hill.

Best bench in the league imo.


Lakers don't want to trade Pau for a package of solid players ... they are waiting for a home run trade which will never come ..
wcsoldier81

 
Posts: 6420
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:20 am

Re: Darius Morris signs QO to stay a Laker - pg 4

Postby therealdeal on Tue Jul 03, 2012 12:24 am

wcsoldier81 wrote:As of now , only Hill is a good bench player , with Glock having the potential to be a good one if he gets more PT ( and the only bench player who can score to save his live) ...

Our bench was last in PPG last season , and TOP 5 worst in general .

-I don't even know why we kept Morris ... he belongs in the D-League
- Ebanks will have a good game every 6-7 games , most of the time he's Casper on the floor
- McRoberts only had good games against bad/average teams .

This bench makes Laker fans wish our team still had the likes of Vujacic/Farmar/Brown

Morris stayed only because he's cheap and young enough that he can provide a 3rd body that isn't ancient. He's a cheap 3rd stringer. It couldn't really be much worse, but for a 3rd it's not going to get a whole lot better for the price. I agree that he belongs in the D-League.

Ebanks went through a stretch from Jan 29 to April 6 where he didn't log more than 5 minutes in a game. I think it's easy to see why he would be Casper on the floor. He went through 12 games of not playing, played less than 3 minutes, then didn't play again for another 11 games and the one game he played in he played less than 2 minutes. He started the first 4 games and played well the first two, struggled the second two (losing most of his minutes in the 4th game) and then hardly played the rest of the season. I just don't see how anyone can hold it against him that he wasn't consistent. That's not his fault that he isn't getting consistent opportunities, it's Brown's. Especially considering he's one of the better young athletes on our team. Notice I say athlete, not player.

McRoberts played poorly in LA for two reasons I think: 1. Lack of consistent playing time and 2. poor rotations and coaching.

He came here to help fill the void of Lamar Odom who played nearly 30 minutes a game consistently. He wasn't going to get that, but here he got only 14 minutes on average. The season before for Indiana he averaged 7.4 points and 5.3 rebounds with 2.1 assists in 22 minutes. If he were to give us that production here we'd be much better off. Unfortunately Brown is an awful coach. McRoberts lost much of his confidence and ended up struggling immensely from the field. I'm not saying he's great, but he's good for his price.

I miss Farmar, but I still remember how bad Sasha was towards the end there. Brown was an idiot and Phil did an awful job coaching him off the bench. He made him into a Kobe-lite... what the hell was up with that?
Stu : "Yeah, that's an old fashioned whoopin'."
therealdeal
CL Global Moderator
 
Posts: 40322
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 3:03 pm

Re: Darius Morris signs QO to stay a Laker - pg 4

Postby therealdeal on Tue Jul 03, 2012 12:30 am

Rooscooter wrote:
therealdeal wrote:Wow i don't agree with that at all. Parker was garbage. He was so bad he didn't even make it in a 2nd rate Chinese team.

I know you hate Ebanks, but i don't know why. He proved he can be every bit as effective as Barnes and for a cheap contract he's a good fit. He provides athleticism and a developong midrange game to go along with good defensive instincts.

Gouelock is a good scorer and McRoberts is a decent backup as is Hill. Again, i didn't say great i aaid pretty gpodand i stand by that. I never claimed they'd be champions.


First... I don't "hate" anyone.......

Second, what does Barnes have to do with Ebanks?

Of the players you listed only one has played any "real" NBA minutes on a team that matters.

Finally... How many of those guys would even make any other team? I'll bet none would get a roster spot on Denver with the exception of McRoberts.....

Our bench is a huge mess......no way around that...


Barnes was Ebanks' immediate competition for the backup 3 spot. Brown continued to play Barnes regardless of his poor performance. Barnes was/is considered to be a solid backup SF option yet he was awful when it counted. Ebanks deserved/deserves the shot that Barnes had. In the final game when given an opportunity to play Ebanks played well, Barnes did not.

And all of the players I mentioned deserve a shot at more "real" NBA minutes on a team that matters.

Denver is a deep team, so I wouldn't expect our 2nd round picks to make it on their team. McRoberts, Hill, and Ebanks would make other teams in the NBA. Goudelock may not only because he's small and hasn't been able to show anything consistently.

Hill and Ebanks have done enough to garner NBA respect since they're being pursued by multiple teams:
Alex Kennedy ‏@AlexKennedyNBA
Lakers' restricted free agent Devin Ebanks has drawn interest from the Magic, Thunder, Nets, Hawks and 76ers: http://tinyurl.com/7hajg3m


lakers-discussion/rumor-michael-beasley-for-jordan-hill-t134605-120.html
Stu : "Yeah, that's an old fashioned whoopin'."
therealdeal
CL Global Moderator
 
Posts: 40322
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 3:03 pm

Re: Darius Morris signs QO to stay a Laker - pg 4

Postby Helljumper on Tue Jul 03, 2012 12:50 am

therealdeal wrote:
Helljumper wrote:
therealdeal wrote:Wow i don't agree with that at all. Parker was garbage. He was so bad he didn't even make it in a 2nd rate Chinese team.

I know you hate Ebanks, but i don't know why. He proved he can be every bit as effective as Barnes and for a cheap contract he's a good fit. He provides athleticism and a developong midrange game to go along with good defensive instincts.

Gouelock is a good scorer and McRoberts is a decent backup as is Hill. Again, i didn't say great i aaid pretty gpodand i stand by that. I never claimed they'd be champions.


Bolded the only statements I agree with.


You disagree that Ebanks can be as effective as Barnes? The same Barnes that averaged 3.5 points and 3.3 rebounds in the playoffs along with shooting 27% overall and 16% from deep? You don't think Ebanks can do that?

I think he, along with most of the league, can do a lot more. The difference is that Ebanks can be had for cheap while a replacement would be more costly.


Nope, I don't think Ebanks can be as effective as the same Barnes that averaged 7.8 ppg, 5.5 rpg, 2.0 apg, 0.8 bpg, 0.6 spg, on 45% from the field and 33% from the three point line (Damn, I had no idea until writing this post now how good of a year Barnes had statistically. That is AMAZING value for a veteran's minimum pick-up. Too bad he choked it up in the playoffs).

Don't get me wrong though, I do think that Ebanks is a rotation player in this league. I just don't want to pencil him into our rotation yet because that takes away a spot off our bench that needs to go to someone who can score and create for himself.
Image
User avatar
Helljumper

 
Posts: 14879
Joined: Fri May 14, 2004 4:40 pm
Location: Riverside, CA

Re: Darius Morris signs QO to stay a Laker - pg 4

Postby therealdeal on Tue Jul 03, 2012 12:52 am

^ We need a SF off the bench that can create for himself? I disagree. I think we need a SG/PG that can create for himself. Our bench rotation at the guard position is awful after our starters. I think Ebanks after Artest is fine. I would prefer that actually since they provide different things and give the defense a different look.

I would like an OJ Mayo-type (not necessarily him) who can come in, play the PG/SG tweener and give Kobe a rest while giving the D a new look.
Stu : "Yeah, that's an old fashioned whoopin'."
therealdeal
CL Global Moderator
 
Posts: 40322
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 3:03 pm

Re: Darius Morris signs QO to stay a Laker - pg 4

Postby The Rock on Tue Jul 03, 2012 12:57 am

I'm on the fence with Ebanks, neither Brown or Phil gave him a fair amount of PT. If 2 coaches dont see anything special I guess hes not worth having on the team but at the same time hes young, hes been with our guys. He at least plays hard and can knock down an open 15-17 footer (that seems to be his range). We can use some continuity with this team. Last years team didnt look like it gelled too well
Image

Props to sidthekid871
User avatar
The Rock
CL Twitter Team
 
Posts: 19991
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 11:10 pm
Location: Smackdown Hotel

Re: Darius Morris signs QO to stay a Laker - pg 4

Postby Finwë on Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:18 am

The Rock wrote:I'm on the fence with Ebanks, neither Brown or Phil gave him a fair amount of PT. If 2 coaches dont see anything special I guess hes not worth having on the team but at the same time hes young, hes been with our guys. He at least plays hard and can knock down an open 15-17 footer (that seems to be his range). We can use some continuity with this team. Last years team didnt look like it gelled too well

Kobe trusted him, he said so in an interview after the nixed CP3 trade.. I don't think he'd just throw Ebanks' name out there (after Drew, Pau and MWP) if he didn't see real promise.
"The first time I ever saw my uniform hanging in the locker I put it on right away, and it just felt like I was putting on golden armour. From that day forward, I just called it 'the golden armour', it just felt like there was something mystical and magical about it" - Kobe Bryant.
User avatar
Finwë

 
Posts: 8078
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 4:32 pm

Re: Darius Morris signs QO to stay a Laker - pg 4

Postby Rooscooter on Tue Jul 03, 2012 9:12 am

therealdeal wrote:Barnes was Ebanks' immediate competition for the backup 3 spot. Brown continued to play Barnes regardless of his poor performance. Barnes was/is considered to be a solid backup SF option yet he was awful when it counted. Ebanks deserved/deserves the shot that Barnes had. In the final game when given an opportunity to play Ebanks played well, Barnes did not.


Again.... what does Barnes have to do with Ebanks?.... So what if he was "in front" of him..... Barnes has absolutely nothing to do with how Ebanks played..... or didn't to be more correct. Ebanks couldn't even be consistent at the D-League level and sure didn't stand out at that level either in the 3 games I watched....

The Tweet you provided about Ebanks receiving interest..... if another player is connected to the Lakers it's using the Lakers for leverage.... If a Laker player is connected to any other team it's REAL.... I'd let the other teams set the market for a guy that has shown absolutely zip in 2 years other than a few 4 minute stretches. He isn't a spot up shooter, isn't a very good ball handler playing at a position that needs a ball handler, isn't a particularly good on ball defender and can't create shots for himself or others....

therealdeal wrote:And all of the players I mentioned deserve a shot at more "real" NBA minutes on a team that matters.

Why?... shouldn't they "earn" them through good play when they got a chance?... Can you honestly say Morris, in his stretch of playing "deserved" any more time on the floor?.... Ebanks started the season as the starter.... had a good 2 games.... then stunk it up.... he eventually fell all the way to the D-League.... that's pretty hard to do with our bench don't you think?... Goudelock showed the most but in that it's apparent that once the league figured out he could shoot at this level and adjusted that he didn't have any other tricks.... He may be the one of the bunch that has a chance to actually contribute anything other than a jersey filler in this group but I'm not sold that he can be consistent because of his lack of size and tools.

therealdeal wrote:Denver is a deep team, so I wouldn't expect our 2nd round picks to make it on their team. McRoberts, Hill, and Ebanks would make other teams in the NBA. Goudelock may not only because he's small and hasn't been able to show anything consistently.


I actually like McRoberts and I think he might turn out O.K. if we can get a decent group for him to play with... he's a much smarter player than expected. Ebanks hasn't done anything in his 2 years that would make me think he's going to make any other team... I'm not sure what you see in him that you like so much because, to me, he just hasn't shown anything and his skills are not nearly what they need to be at this level. Hill is difficult to gauge..... he hasn't shown diddly up until the last 3 months in his time in the league. In fact he's been traded twice off of teams that could have used a front court player.... I'm not sure he can do what he did for us on a consistent basis going forward.... his last few games in the playoffs were not very impressive. WTS... he's good at rebounding and defense and can give us a good 12 to 15 minutes a game...

The new guys may or may not even get a roster spot..... to say they are part of a group that's "pretty good" is a huge stretch don't you think?....

If we have a bench that looks like this..... one of two things will happen... We will wear Kobe, Pau and Andrew out securing a 4th or 5th seed at best and bow out quickly in the playoffs..... or we will get one of them injured..... The difference in quality between our top 3 and the rest of the team is by far the biggest in the league....
"If the past sits in judgment on the present, the future will be lost." Winston Churchill

“The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present - and is gravely to be regarded." Dwight Eisenhower

"Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it" Thomas Sowell
User avatar
Rooscooter

 
Posts: 23106
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 4:25 pm
Location: Chandler AZ and Andalué

Re: Darius Morris signs QO to stay a Laker - pg 4

Postby therealdeal on Tue Jul 03, 2012 12:07 pm

Rooscooter wrote:Again.... what does Barnes have to do with Ebanks?.... So what if he was "in front" of him..... Barnes has absolutely nothing to do with how Ebanks played..... or didn't to be more correct. Ebanks couldn't even be consistent at the D-League level and sure didn't stand out at that level either in the 3 games I watched....


Barnes playing = less opportunities for Ebanks to play. That's pretty much as simple as I can make it, Roos. He can't get opportunities to play when Brown isn't playing him. Even when Barnes struggled, he stayed with him unlike when Ebanks struggled and he buried him on the bench.

Rooscooter wrote:The Tweet you provided about Ebanks receiving interest..... if another player is connected to the Lakers it's using the Lakers for leverage.... If a Laker player is connected to any other team it's REAL.... I'd let the other teams set the market for a guy that has shown absolutely zip in 2 years other than a few 4 minute stretches. He isn't a spot up shooter, isn't a very good ball handler playing at a position that needs a ball handler, isn't a particularly good on ball defender and can't create shots for himself or others....

Since when does a SF need to be a ball handler? And I didn't say anything about whether or not other teams should set the value for Ebanks, I agree with that. All I'm saying is there is interest in him. There wouldn't be interest if he didn't show promise. There's a difference between a list of teams and simply throwing the Lakers in with another group.

Rooscooter wrote:Why?... shouldn't they "earn" them through good play when they got a chance?... Can you honestly say Morris, in his stretch of playing "deserved" any more time on the floor?....
I was referring more to the recent list I was talking about in that post: Ebanks, McRoberts, Hill, and Goudelock. I never said much about Morris other than that he is an athlete.
Rooscooter wrote:Ebanks started the season as the starter.... had a good 2 games.... then stunk it up.... he eventually fell all the way to the D-League.... that's pretty hard to do with our bench don't you think?...
Not his fault that Brown is an awful coach.
Rooscooter wrote: Goudelock showed the most but in that it's apparent that once the league figured out he could shoot at this level and adjusted that he didn't have any other tricks....

Actually he had that very effective floater. I think most teams figured out that they could simply attack him defensively because he wasn't big or strong enough defensively.
Rooscooter wrote:He may be the one of the bunch that has a chance to actually contribute anything other than a jersey filler in this group but I'm not sold that he can be consistent because of his lack of size and tools.
Agreed. But I think that implies that he deserves a shot right?
Rooscooter wrote:I actually like McRoberts and I think he might turn out O.K. if we can get a decent group for him to play with... he's a much smarter player than expected. Ebanks hasn't done anything in his 2 years that would make me think he's going to make any other team... I'm not sure what you see in him that you like so much because, to me, he just hasn't shown anything and his skills are not nearly what they need to be at this level. Hill is difficult to gauge..... he hasn't shown diddly up until the last 3 months in his time in the league. In fact he's been traded twice off of teams that could have used a front court player.... I'm not sure he can do what he did for us on a consistent basis going forward.... his last few games in the playoffs were not very impressive. WTS... he's good at rebounding and defense and can give us a good 12 to 15 minutes a game...
Agreed on McRoberts, but again I think that means he deserves a shot. Ebanks, again we can agree to disagree about him.

Rooscooter wrote:The new guys may or may not even get a roster spot..... to say they are part of a group that's "pretty good" is a huge stretch don't you think?....
Not really unless we have a vastly different view on "pretty good". To me it means alright, not great, not going to win but can be good from time to time. I stick by that.
Rooscooter wrote:If we have a bench that looks like this..... one of two things will happen... We will wear Kobe, Pau and Andrew out securing a 4th or 5th seed at best and bow out quickly in the playoffs..... or we will get one of them injured..... The difference in quality between our top 3 and the rest of the team is by far the biggest in the league....
I don't disagree except that I think our team could do better with a better coach and they would end up more in the 3-4 range, not the 5.
Stu : "Yeah, that's an old fashioned whoopin'."
therealdeal
CL Global Moderator
 
Posts: 40322
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 3:03 pm

Re: Darius Morris signs QO to stay a Laker - pg 4

Postby Juronimo on Tue Jul 03, 2012 12:12 pm

Doc Brown wrote:Blake / Morris
Kobe / DJO / Glock
MWP / Ebanks
Pau / McFly
Bynum / Hill

:jam2: :jam2: :jam2:


If that's our team next season, we would have the worst bench in the history of organized team sports. I hope we do something to bolster our bench, anything. I'm not holding my breath.
Image

Ferguson, we hear you.
RIP Mike Brown.
User avatar
Juronimo

 
Posts: 6598
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 6:20 pm
Location: Fist in the air on a quest for justice

Re: Darius Morris signs QO to stay a Laker - pg 4

Postby jimbo327 on Wed Jul 04, 2012 2:06 am

If we are going to make a QO to Morris, at least Brown could have given the kid some playing time last year. Sometimes, I don't know what is going on in that potato of his.
Soylent Green is People!
User avatar
jimbo327

 
Posts: 14919
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2003 10:56 pm
Location: Where Else?

Re: Darius Morris signs QO to stay a Laker - pg 4

Postby V.V.V.V.V. on Wed Jul 04, 2012 2:19 am

Morris is cheap, and he was a rook so he does have some upside. It's just a low-risk investment, since he's making less than a mil.
Vi Veri Vniversum Vivus Vici
V.V.V.V.V.

 
Posts: 3141
Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 11:59 pm
Location: Hollywood

Re: Darius Morris signs QO to stay a Laker - pg 4

Postby Pig Miller on Wed Jul 04, 2012 7:49 am

how did this not the front page of the sports headlines?

all this is, is a cheap roster spot. he was terrible last year, hope he improves to at least being a decent garbage time player that half of the board will then proclaim should be getting 35 minutes a game because he scored 4 points in 2 minutes. of course someone will project that to 30 minutes and all of a sudden we have an all-star at a minimum salary.

boom!
Pig Miller

 
Posts: 2882
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 7:24 am

Re: Darius Morris signs QO to stay a Laker - pg 4

Postby Rooscooter on Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:04 am

therealdeal wrote:
Rooscooter wrote:Again.... what does Barnes have to do with Ebanks?.... So what if he was "in front" of him..... Barnes has absolutely nothing to do with how Ebanks played..... or didn't to be more correct. Ebanks couldn't even be consistent at the D-League level and sure didn't stand out at that level either in the 3 games I watched....


Barnes playing = less opportunities for Ebanks to play. That's pretty much as simple as I can make it, Roos. He can't get opportunities to play when Brown isn't playing him. Even when Barnes struggled, he stayed with him unlike when Ebanks struggled and he buried him on the bench.


I guess I'm not making myself clear..... you keep going back to the notion that Brown didn't give Ebanks a chance...... He started the season at the 3..... for a guy that played next to nothing in his first year that seems like a CHANCE or an OPPORTUNITY to me..... What more could a second year, second round pick ask for on the freakin LA Lakers?!.... A starting slot is a starting slot. He had a couple decent stretches and then basically went in the tank.... What's Brown supposed to do..... keep trotting him out there and keep proven vets on the bench?....

Heres a synopsis of his playing time
Regular Season: (12 Starts)
Over 15 minutes: 15 games
Over 20 minutes: 10 games
Over 25 minutes: 7 games
Over 30 minutes: 1 game

Post Season: (6 starts)
Over 15 minutes: 6 games
Over 20 minutes: 2 games

That isn't a chance? He played over 15 minutes in 1/4 of our regular season and 1/2 of our post season games.....

Listen.... I'm not a real fan of what I saw from Brown either.... the amount of time Kobe and Bynum played as well as the long stretches was borderline stupid IMO.... but how he handled Ebanks seemed about right to me.... he didn't show much when given the chance except in very small stretches and without any consistency.

As for my "ball handling" comment.... think Caron Butler, Deng, Marion, Melo, Granger even Paul Pierce.... that level of ball handling is crucial at the SF position...(comparing just ball handling now) Ebanks' handles are pretty poor for a SF.... and because of it he can't create anything for himself or others off the dribble..... he isn't a good shooter either.... so on the offensive end others need to create for him.... with the make-up of our team I don't think we can afford a SF that has deficiencies in his game like that. In the NBA most SF's can create shots and shoot....

Who knows maybe he's got it in him to improve..... but he squandered a great opportunity IMO this year.... I'd move on personally or at the very least let the rest of the league set the price for him..... closing a roster spot this early with him doesn't seem to really be in our best interests and tells me that the team wants to go into next year with a MWP/Ebanks depth chart at the SF.... that's taking a step back at that position..... and that's hard to do because we had the worst SF play in the league.....
"If the past sits in judgment on the present, the future will be lost." Winston Churchill

“The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present - and is gravely to be regarded." Dwight Eisenhower

"Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it" Thomas Sowell
User avatar
Rooscooter

 
Posts: 23106
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 4:25 pm
Location: Chandler AZ and Andalué

Re: Darius Morris signs QO to stay a Laker - pg 4

Postby trodgers on Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:15 am

Why is this thread discussing Barnes OR Ebanks? It's a Morris thread!

Cool discussion, but not the place for it. Move it elsewhere and I'll even chime in.
twitter.com/lakersballtweet lakersball.com
User avatar
trodgers
Site Manager
 
Posts: 46636
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 6:31 pm
Location: Orlando

Re: Darius Morris signs QO to stay a Laker - pg 4

Postby puffyusaf#2 on Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:13 pm

^what do you mean? Aren't people supposed to talk about other things in topics that they don't have to do with.... Speaking of which.... How about those Bears?
I don't always bring down the hammer but when I do it is usually to a troll! Stay TROLL FREE my freinds!
User avatar
puffyusaf#2
Clublakers Moderator
 
Posts: 31167
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 3:15 pm
Location: Making folks sexy with dancin'

Re: Darius Morris signs QO to stay a Laker - pg 4

Postby V.V.V.V.V. on Wed Jul 04, 2012 6:57 pm

If Sesh moves on looking for a starting spot, it's time for Morris to step up.
Vi Veri Vniversum Vivus Vici
V.V.V.V.V.

 
Posts: 3141
Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 11:59 pm
Location: Hollywood

PreviousNext

Return to NBA Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 10 guests

cron
Advertise Here | Privacy Policy | ©2008 Sculu Sports. Come Strong.