


Rooscooter wrote:Completely different games and products.... The NFL puts a fantastic product on the field (recent events excluded) while the NBA has concentrated talent in just a few locations..... The overall skill level of the NBA is watered down by the number of teams and the HS kids that have physical talent but no fundamental game nor work ethic to gain the skills.... Contraction of 4 teams and a minimum draft age of 21 would make a much more competitive league IMO....
You can re-work your roster in the NFL in one or two off seasons from a poor team to a contender.... that just doesn't happen in the NBA often if at all....
The games have evolved differently as well..... The NBA game can be absolutely dominated by one player out of 5.... The NFL game cannot.... in fact without a complete team few teams and individuals find consistent success. One Superstar in the NBA gets you to the playoffs most years..... you can have two or three and not even be .500 in the NFL because of the "team" nature of the sport.
I've played both games quite a bit (played college football) and enjoy watching both about equally. I was better as a player on the football field but always liked basketball a little more....
Finally the comment and thought that a NBA player because of his athletic prowess could step on the football field at the NFL level and even compete is not based in the reality of the difference of the games...... Physical ability has little to do with overall value in the NFL.... it's a factor but not a decider in who is great and who's a bust....... go look at the "combine" stats from year to year and then overlay that with the All-Pro and Pro-Bowl picks in a given year and you'll see what I mean. 4.3 speed means jack if you can't run predictable routes and catch while taking a hit.......
The Original 81 wrote:I think football its more appealing to the average person. One game a week, high intensity, fast paced, just more exciting to that person rather than watching a basketball game thats on 3-4 times a week. I agree with your point about football being played a lot less being a negative, but I think that also works in their favor.
I think basketball absolutely takes more skill than football. Football is definitely more demanding physically for obvious reasons. I can only imagine how their bodies feel after a game.
I do like football but its not comparable to my love for basketball.
Football Games Have 11 Minutes of Action
According to a Wall Street Journal study of four recent broadcasts, and similar estimates by researchers, the average amount of time the ball is in play on the field during an NFL game is about 11 minutes.
In other words, if you tally up everything that happens between the time the ball is snapped and the play is whistled dead by the officials, there's barely enough time to prepare a hard-boiled egg. In fact, the average telecast devotes 56% more time to showing replays.
So what do the networks do with the other 174 minutes in a typical broadcast? Not surprisingly, commercials take up about an hour. As many as 75 minutes, or about 60% of the total air time, excluding commercials, is spent on shots of players huddling, standing at the line of scrimmage or just generally milling about between snaps. In the four broadcasts The Journal studied, injured players got six more seconds of camera time than celebrating players. While the network announcers showed up on screen for just 30 seconds, shots of the head coaches and referees took up about 7% of the average show.


Finwë wrote:I don't know what's objectively better, but I LOVE the NBA, and I don't watch football.
Philliekb8 wrote:The Original 81 wrote:I think football its more appealing to the average person. One game a week, high intensity, fast paced, just more exciting to that person rather than watching a basketball game thats on 3-4 times a week. I agree with your point about football being played a lot less being a negative, but I think that also works in their favor.
I think basketball absolutely takes more skill than football. Football is definitely more demanding physically for obvious reasons. I can only imagine how their bodies feel after a game.
I do like football but its not comparable to my love for basketball.

Showtime.Revival.05 wrote:i'd rather watch the lakers over any nfl game for the most part, unless comparing the superbowl or postseason to a regular season lakers game. but overall i gotta go with the nfl. i love the parity, especially this season. i think there was a record set for how many teams started 1-1 this year & just going through a list of all the teams theres only a handful that i would consider bad overall. put it this way i'd way rather watch a bengals v redskins game like last weekend than something like bucks v raptors
also fantasy football is awesome
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 7 guests