But how do we then regulate what atricles warrant their own thread? Do only LA Times, OC Register, Yahoo, SI, etc articles deserve threads, how do we know what's worthwhile and what to lock? Do only Bresnahan and plaschke articles make it, not Simers? Do only Ding articles make it because Carr writes small stuff? Only Woj not Dwyer? That's why IMO most articles about players going in their specific threads works, it can all go there and not have to be decided on about locking or not. Tweets, blogs, articles, they all get to go there no matter how important or silly. Some articles already so get their own threads though, not everything gets put in those threads for certain players. And then team articles always get their own threads too. So I don't know, I think things are done pretty close to perfectly now, if every article gets it's own thread there's clutter, if threads get locked for being less important articles and to keep the place more organized people get mad, can't please everyone. Lastly I have to say I browse this site I would say at least 75% of the time from my iPhone, and I haven't encountered any of the issues you bring up, I never have an issue finding an article or tweet or anything like that after a quick browse, and most of the time the current most important articles and the page numbers they're on is posted in a thread title.