Radner wrote:^^^ And don't forget about Buss. You know he wants to keep his money flowing throughout 2010+.
People shouldn't be surprised if we end up with a lottery pick if the Bobcats' deal somehow falls through.
Savory Griddles wrote:Radner wrote:^^^ And don't forget about Buss. You know he wants to keep his money flowing throughout 2010+.
People shouldn't be surprised if we end up with a lottery pick if the Bobcats' deal somehow falls through.
You mean a straight up trade of Odom for the 9th pick? I think that only happens if Artest is a guarantee as far as opting out and signing with us. And if Odom is getting shipped out (Artest loves Odom) there's no way he's gonna guarantee that with us.

Don't most SF average 5-6 rebounds per game? And aren't most SF's out of position for rebounds?Lakerjones wrote:westcoast21 wrote:Gerald Wallace is the defensive player we need at the three. But basically we would be taking on a big contract for more defense and less rebounds, take a look at the career averages for both Odom and Wallace:
Wallace
11.6 ppg
5.0 rpg
1.8 apg
47% field goal percentage
30% 3-point percentage
66% from the free throw line
Odom
15.6 ppg
8.9 rpg
4.4 apg
46% field goal percentage
31% 3-point percentage
70% from the free throw line
The only think Wallace has over Lamar is his defensive ability. So because of that, Odom for Wallace should not be done. Even though we need defensive, there has to be a better deal for us. Unless the LA, CHA, and NJ 3 way will start up again.
Not a fair assessment. Look at LO's rebounding stats as a SF not a PF. LO dominates the boards, his best attribute for us at the PF position. As a SF his numbers go WAY down. I believe he was averaging about 5-6 a game as SF. He played SF for half a year the first year Phil returned and for his early games this year. At that time this season I remember checking in and seeing him averaging something like 5.3. He was returning from injury, granted, but the real issue is that he was camping out at the 3 point line once again like the last time he played SF for us. He was OUT OF REBOUNDING POSITION AT THE 3. That's the bottom line. He isn't a good fit for us at 3. Wallace is improved Defense at 3 (Lamar can't cover 3's) and still rebounds well.
Here are his numbers at SF at the beginning of the season (2007-2008):
Savory Griddles wrote:Radner wrote:^^^ And don't forget about Buss. You know he wants to keep his money flowing throughout 2010+.
People shouldn't be surprised if we end up with a lottery pick if the Bobcats' deal somehow falls through.
You mean a straight up trade of Odom for the 9th pick? I think that only happens if Artest is a guarantee as far as opting out and signing with us. And if Odom is getting shipped out (Artest loves Odom) there's no way he's gonna guarantee that with us.
Radner wrote:mapabu1 wrote:What is the exact proposed deal since Odom makes more than Wallace
The deal that last stand proposed was this:
Lamar
Vlad
58th pick
for
Wallace
Nazr
38th pick
The Lakers are moving up to draft George Hill though I think they need a big than anything.

He's confusing Buss with Donald Sterling.Lakerman JSJ wrote:lakefansac wrote:As much as Dr. Buss is a great owner, he also is known as a tightwad, penny pincher who wants to spend as less as possible.
Where the hell did you get that?
Dr. Buss isn't going to just throw away money on a lackluster team because he's an intelligent business man, but he has shown a willingness to go well above the salary cap (& into the luxury tax) if it puts an elite team on the floor as evidenced by our trade for Gasol earlier this year.
If he was such a "tightwad", he wouldn't have given that deal the green light because it is going to result in a TON more salary that he's on the hook for as well as a lot of luxury tax penalty payments.

Are those last years numbers or career?lakerman24 wrote:FabFourLakers wrote:im not really high on this deal....g-wallace cant hit the 3...im not very sure about this...G-wallace isnt battle tested like Lamar...i'd hold off on this deal
Actually Gerald is a better 3 point shooter than Odom.
Odom 27%
Gerald 32%
karlmalonefan wrote:Are those last years numbers or career?lakerman24 wrote:FabFourLakers wrote:im not really high on this deal....g-wallace cant hit the 3...im not very sure about this...G-wallace isnt battle tested like Lamar...i'd hold off on this deal
Actually Gerald is a better 3 point shooter than Odom.
Odom 27%
Gerald 32%


Radner wrote:leakbrewergator wrote:Gerald Wallace would be able to compete with Luke for the role of Barry White.s voice at the Lakers Christmas production.
Wallace has the Pippen voice.

Radner wrote:leakbrewergator wrote:Gerald Wallace would be able to compete with Luke for the role of Barry White.s voice at the Lakers Christmas production.
Wallace has the Pippen voice.
wow what an upgrade in three point shooting.westcoast21 wrote:karlmalonefan wrote:Are those last years numbers or career?lakerman24 wrote:FabFourLakers wrote:im not really high on this deal....g-wallace cant hit the 3...im not very sure about this...G-wallace isnt battle tested like Lamar...i'd hold off on this deal
Actually Gerald is a better 3 point shooter than Odom.
Odom 27%
Gerald 32%
those are last years i believe. The career numbers have Odom at 31% and Wallace at 30% if i remember correctly.

JSM wrote:last stand wrote:i hope larry brown is so in love with odom
they send wallace, mohammed, and the 9th pick
i would cry tears of joy till october
Maybe he and Riley will get in a bidding war.

khmrP wrote:man you guys are funny you call G. Walls glass man but yet when have we had Odom for an entire season?
JSM wrote:Cats just traded a future first to the Nuggets for the 20th pick.
Does that mean the 9th coming to LA? Probably not, but it's fun to speculate until we are let down tomorrow night.


Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests