
KB8@CL wrote:if Bynum was not included it would be a rape from us...now it seems to be fair somehow but I would first try Kwame for Zach Randolph..he is more inside player than KG, younger and also we would be able to keep Odom and Bynum...
I can´t deny losing Sasha and Cook is awesome.
but Odom/Bynum/Zach >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KG...
Odom Light: Less filling, Wastes great
crucifixion wrote:KB8@CL wrote:if Bynum was not included it would be a rape from us...now it seems to be fair somehow but I would first try Kwame for Zach Randolph..he is more inside player than KG, younger and also we would be able to keep Odom and Bynum...
I can´t deny losing Sasha and Cook is awesome.
but Odom/Bynum/Zach >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KG...
Possibly, but Zach came off microfracture and Odom just another surgery.
Plus, the intimidation factor is great if is Kobe/KG as opposed to Kobe/Zach/Odom/Bynum
Not to mention I dont see why they'd only want an expiring for Zach.
Also, Zach isn't as good a defender as KG, so thats ever more weak D on our part.

\
Flatlyner wrote:Yeah, you take out the draft pick coming back to us and I dont like the deal. With it in, I can certainly live with it. We could easily get a big man with #7 (Thornton, JianLian, Hawes) or a SF (Brewer, Wright, Green).
KB8@CL wrote:if Bynum was not included it would be a rape from us...now it seems to be fair somehow but I would first try Kwame for Zach Randolph..he is more inside player than KG, younger and also we would be able to keep Odom and Bynum...
I can´t deny losing Sasha and Cook is awesome.
but Odom/Bynum/Zach >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KG...
xXXInvisibleXXx wrote:I tend to believe you Maverick. but we have gone through this every summer i hope you're finally the one who breaks something.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest