

Lakers8899 wrote:You don't even understand what rhythm is and you say I haven't played/watched a game?Any superstar that could shoot the fadeaway could have made the shot that Kobe made. There wasn't even an attempt to soft-double him.

Lakers8899 wrote:Freakout wrote:Funny because everyone knows who's the best player out there yet fellow Laker fans bash him.
One shot in a scrimmage game does not make one the best player. No way in hell any team would allow that many dribbles and separation without help in a real game.
Cody wrote:Lakers8899 wrote:You don't even understand what rhythm is and you say I haven't played/watched a game?Any superstar that could shoot the fadeaway could have made the shot that Kobe made. There wasn't even an attempt to soft-double him.
Okay, have you played competitive basketball before?
I said that your argument for rhythm can be used for ANY player and most game-winning shots... and you come back with this? The fact is, most players would have missed that shot.
Why would you double Kobe Bryant at the top of the trey, when all that would do is leave someone WIDE OPEN.... that is, with SIX SECONDS left in the game.
Let me help you, six seconds is more than enough time that, if you double Kobe Bean Bryant, you've got someone WIDE OPEN. That means no one is guarding the person and he is WIDE OPEN and will more than likely nail the shot. Because no one would be guarding that person.
Get it?
L4L wrote:two0one7 wrote:Kob3eight wrote:My schedule shows the game will be replayed at 7pm on FSN again.
If thats true, I'm watching it again. Who's with me?
I'm watching it for the first time on NBATV!!! I watched on sopcast but it was the crappiest signal ever. Still, it worked when it counted and I saw the 3 shots by Kobe in the 4th!!
GO LAKERS!
Lakers8899 wrote:Cody wrote:Lakers8899 wrote:You don't even understand what rhythm is and you say I haven't played/watched a game?Any superstar that could shoot the fadeaway could have made the shot that Kobe made. There wasn't even an attempt to soft-double him.
Okay, have you played competitive basketball before?
I said that your argument for rhythm can be used for ANY player and most game-winning shots... and you come back with this? The fact is, most players would have missed that shot.
Why would you double Kobe Bryant at the top of the trey, when all that would do is leave someone WIDE OPEN.... that is, with SIX SECONDS left in the game.
Let me help you, six seconds is more than enough time that, if you double Kobe Bean Bryant, you've got someone WIDE OPEN. That means no one is guarding the person and he is WIDE OPEN and will more than likely nail the shot. Because no one would be guarding that person.
Get it?
If you've actually watched a basketball game, you'd know that a well-timed double doesn't necessarily leave someone wide open.


air_bryant08 wrote:heres a pic![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Cody wrote:Lakers8899 wrote:Cody wrote:Lakers8899 wrote:You don't even understand what rhythm is and you say I haven't played/watched a game?Any superstar that could shoot the fadeaway could have made the shot that Kobe made. There wasn't even an attempt to soft-double him.
Okay, have you played competitive basketball before?
I said that your argument for rhythm can be used for ANY player and most game-winning shots... and you come back with this? The fact is, most players would have missed that shot.
Why would you double Kobe Bryant at the top of the trey, when all that would do is leave someone WIDE OPEN.... that is, with SIX SECONDS left in the game.
Let me help you, six seconds is more than enough time that, if you double Kobe Bean Bryant, you've got someone WIDE OPEN. That means no one is guarding the person and he is WIDE OPEN and will more than likely nail the shot. Because no one would be guarding that person.
Get it?
If you've actually watched a basketball game, you'd know that a well-timed double doesn't necessarily leave someone wide open.
You seriously think that they could have doubled Kobe Bryant without leaving someone wide open? Especially with 10-6 seconds left?
What's your argument anyway? That anyway could make a game-winning shot like Kobe Bryant because he had rhythm, spacing and shot over Jkidd. Well, anyone that can shoot a fadeaway? He didn't even fade that much on his shot.
JKsnoots wrote:I like how everyone starts saying Team USA will win gold after Kobe's game winner. I love Kobe but lets not get carried away. Teams have caught up with U.S. basketball, plain and simple. We should stop talking about blowing out people and concentrate on playing like a team.
TooSexyForMyShirt wrote:JKsnoots wrote:I like how everyone starts saying Team USA will win gold after Kobe's game winner. I love Kobe but lets not get carried away. Teams have caught up with U.S. basketball, plain and simple. We should stop talking about blowing out people and concentrate on playing like a team.
Teams haven't caught up with USA. You send an NBA scrub to Europe and he dominates and win MVPs. You send the best player from Europe and he *might* be the 6th man.
It's all about adjusting to the International play and rules.
Lakers8899 wrote:Cody wrote:Lakers8899 wrote:Cody wrote:Lakers8899 wrote:You don't even understand what rhythm is and you say I haven't played/watched a game?Any superstar that could shoot the fadeaway could have made the shot that Kobe made. There wasn't even an attempt to soft-double him.
Okay, have you played competitive basketball before?
I said that your argument for rhythm can be used for ANY player and most game-winning shots... and you come back with this? The fact is, most players would have missed that shot.
Why would you double Kobe Bryant at the top of the trey, when all that would do is leave someone WIDE OPEN.... that is, with SIX SECONDS left in the game.
Let me help you, six seconds is more than enough time that, if you double Kobe Bean Bryant, you've got someone WIDE OPEN. That means no one is guarding the person and he is WIDE OPEN and will more than likely nail the shot. Because no one would be guarding that person.
Get it?
If you've actually watched a basketball game, you'd know that a well-timed double doesn't necessarily leave someone wide open.
You seriously think that they could have doubled Kobe Bryant without leaving someone wide open? Especially with 10-6 seconds left?
What's your argument anyway? That anyway could make a game-winning shot like Kobe Bryant because he had rhythm, spacing and shot over Jkidd. Well, anyone that can shoot a fadeaway? He didn't even fade that much on his shot.
I'm saying that it's not going to be that easy in a real game. In a real game, first they'll try hard to deny him the ball. If he does catch it, it'll likely be to the side where he'll have a lot less options. If he does get into that position, most likely, they'll help just right he looks like he was about to shoot, unless Prince was playing perfect defense, which he was not.
Force wrote:You're acting as if Kobe has yet to prove that he can make a game winner in real NBA game. Does it really bother you that much that he made a game winning shot or have you recieved a message from God telling you to discredit Kobe whenever the oppurtunity presents itself?
hgo wrote:
you said it ... crazy
did they watch Melo's game ?
nbafan wrote:hgo wrote:
you said it ... crazy
did they watch Melo's game ?
it's pretty simple.. some people would rather lose than have Kobe "save the day"..
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest