Fisher or Blake

Which player brings more to the table?

Would you welcome Fish back as back up point and play over Blake as a safety net

silversurfer.

Who cares.

Neither... But if I had to choose at this point in their career its black all day. I love Fish, but he can't guard anyone. I would gladly take Fish back as to play spot minutes like he did in OKC as long as the Lakers had a legit starter and a capable backup. But if you are talking extended minutes played its Blake, even though that isn't exactly a wonderful solution.

we have nash, i dont want another 38 yr old joining our team to back up our 38 year old starting PG.



we need young legs, our back court is too old. get a young PG, a solid one.



all in all, i would take fisher for blake. my god how did he miss that game winner during that OKC series? he was miles away from ANY defender.

it was almost just as bad as when courtney lee missed that layup during game 2 of the finals.

Blake has more potential to be good. He is quicker and a little longer, but he never shoots and seems to be a decoy out there. Both of them are ultimate scrubs, but I'll take Fisher.

lakerfan2 wrote:silversurfer.

Doberman

the MDE wrote:Blake has more potential to be good. He is quicker and a little longer, but he never shoots and seems to be a decoy out there. Both of them are ultimate scrubs, but I'll take Fisher.

been 2yrs, Blake got no potential, he sucks end of story.

khmrP wrote:

the MDE wrote:Blake has more potential to be good. He is quicker and a little longer, but he never shoots and seems to be a decoy out there. Both of them are ultimate scrubs, but I'll take Fisher.

been 2yrs, Blake got no potential, he sucks end of story.

lol this is a joke, more potential? his prime was over since he got to the lakers.

him not shooting alot, but having a high 3pt % was a perk for him, but it was fools gold, although it seemed like an upgrade from farmar who took alot of shots, but atleast farmar can make those shots, esp the clutch ones and he can penetrate, and atleast keep up with the younger guards.


steve blake? a decoy? lmao thats funny bro.

lol fisher a scrub? do you forget what hes done for this organization and us the fans for over the past 10 years? he hes goddamn 38 of course hes not going to be playing on the same level when he was in his 20s.

steve blake was a bust. all he does is sit out and camp the 3 point like like vujacic and than pass up open 3 pointers.

what a great pg we have.