yes please!EDIT: on second thought.... We should probably make damn sure we have a serviceable backup point guard if we do this, as Nash will probably only play 30-32 minutes a night.
yes please!kray28 wrote:This whole deal is BS....made up "heard it on the radio" BS.

KeepBynum wrote:kray28 wrote:If this is true (and I have my doubts), who's our second string PG?
Goudelock.
Its like Dr. Buss is guarding the Celtic rim this second half. Nothings dropping
trodgers wrote:KeepBynum wrote:kray28 wrote:If this is true (and I have my doubts), who's our second string PG?
Goudelock.
I think Goudelock is a so-so backup SG. As a backup PG, he's a nightmare.

KeepBynum wrote:trodgers wrote:I think Goudelock is a so-so backup SG. As a backup PG, he's a nightmare.
Blake isn't any better. G-Lock is a MUCH better player. He gave us what Blake did in about half the time.
Its like Dr. Buss is guarding the Celtic rim this second half. Nothings dropping
KeepBynum wrote:trodgers wrote:KeepBynum wrote:Goudelock.
I think Goudelock is a so-so backup SG. As a backup PG, he's a nightmare.
Blake isn't any better.
KeepBynum wrote:kray28 wrote:This whole deal is BS....made up "heard it on the radio" BS.
No it's not.

KeepBynum wrote:Sign both Hills and Jamison.
Nash/G-Lock
Kobe/Mayo
MWP/G-Hill
Pau/Jamison
Drew/J-Hill
My goodness.

trodgers wrote:KeepBynum wrote:trodgers wrote:I think Goudelock is a so-so backup SG. As a backup PG, he's a nightmare.
Blake isn't any better. G-Lock is a MUCH better player. He gave us what Blake did in about half the time.
Of course he is.

Its like Dr. Buss is guarding the Celtic rim this second half. Nothings dropping
KeepBynum wrote:Stats say otherwise.
Glock - 4 ppg in 10 mpg
Blake - 5 ppg in 23 mpg
Blake only averages 1 more ppg and he plays 13 more mpg.
Its like Dr. Buss is guarding the Celtic rim this second half. Nothings dropping

trodgers wrote:KeepBynum wrote:Stats say otherwise.
Glock - 4 ppg in 10 mpg
Blake - 5 ppg in 23 mpg
Blake only averages 1 more ppg and he plays 13 more mpg.
You just used points per minute as your entire argument that a player is better than another? Isn't that staggeringly asinine?
Jeff Goldblum @TheJeffGoldblum
Using ppm to decide if player x > player y is 98.542% asinine.

KeepBynum wrote:We need offense. Glock provides that, Blake doesn't. He sucks and needs to go. Those stats are very deceiving because of the minutes played. Blake plays more so of course his assist numbers are gonna be higher.
Its like Dr. Buss is guarding the Celtic rim this second half. Nothings dropping
GoldHammish wrote:trodgers wrote:KeepBynum wrote:Stats say otherwise.
Glock - 4 ppg in 10 mpg
Blake - 5 ppg in 23 mpg
Blake only averages 1 more ppg and he plays 13 more mpg.
You just used points per minute as your entire argument that a player is better than another? Isn't that staggeringly asinine?Jeff Goldblum @TheJeffGoldblum
Using ppm to decide if player x > player y is 98.542% asinine.

Its like Dr. Buss is guarding the Celtic rim this second half. Nothings dropping
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests