Vasashi17 wrote:I found something really interesting pertaining to the Boozer trade hype at the trading deadline.LA Times:Remember that absurd Carlos Boozer-for-Caron Butler, Devean George and Vlade Divac trade "rumor" over the All-Star break? It looks as though it may have originated with the Boozer camp. On top of Boozer's struggles and those of the team, Jazz owner Larry Miller acknowledged that Boozer's wife, CeCe, didn't like Salt Lake City. "She was concerned about how she felt they had been received, welcomed in the community," said Miller, "but she has since said, unsolicited, that they've settled in and she's glad they're here." There were concerns CeCe's husband wasn't crazy about the place, either. On Feb. 10, Miller publicly questioned Boozer's effort and toughness. On Feb. 14, Boozer went out for the season because of a foot injury. On April 21, the day after the season ended, Boozer said he was sound again. Nevertheless, Miller says all is forgiven. "I don't have any regrets about him at all," he said. "From today's viewpoint, I would say clearly he will be here at least through the term of his contract."
bigsleepy wrote:Vasashi17 wrote:I found something really interesting pertaining to the Boozer trade hype at the trading deadline.LA Times:Remember that absurd Carlos Boozer-for-Caron Butler, Devean George and Vlade Divac trade "rumor" over the All-Star break? It looks as though it may have originated with the Boozer camp. On top of Boozer's struggles and those of the team, Jazz owner Larry Miller acknowledged that Boozer's wife, CeCe, didn't like Salt Lake City. "She was concerned about how she felt they had been received, welcomed in the community," said Miller, "but she has since said, unsolicited, that they've settled in and she's glad they're here." There were concerns CeCe's husband wasn't crazy about the place, either. On Feb. 10, Miller publicly questioned Boozer's effort and toughness. On Feb. 14, Boozer went out for the season because of a foot injury. On April 21, the day after the season ended, Boozer said he was sound again. Nevertheless, Miller says all is forgiven. "I don't have any regrets about him at all," he said. "From today's viewpoint, I would say clearly he will be here at least through the term of his contract."
I saw that too.. good find Vas.
Now won't you all please let it go???
JbOi112 wrote:I barely come here that often because of school, but I do remember emplay even reporting that while Miller insists that Boozer and the UTAH org are all swell and fine, Boozer seems to express otherwise.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
He is overpaid for sure BUT if the Lakers can get him we should do it in a heartbeat. Boozer is a top 10 PF in the league and we need a big body desperately.echo nation wrote:does anyone else think that boozer was kind of a bust at his price?

echo nation wrote:does anyone else think that boozer was kind of a bust at his price?
abeer3 wrote:echo nation wrote:does anyone else think that boozer was kind of a bust at his price?
considering that utah is a small market team, they could have probably spent more wisely. but the lakers need talent so badly that they are willing to overpay.
k0pr0phage wrote:abeer3 wrote:echo nation wrote:does anyone else think that boozer was kind of a bust at his price?
considering that utah is a small market team, they could have probably spent more wisely. but the lakers need talent so badly that they are willing to overpay.
I don't think he's overpriced (relative to his sport). He's 18, 9, and almost 3 assists at 52% shooting and can at least hold his own defensively. If there is a way to get him at 4, with Odom at 3, Kobe at 2, we can get by with Mihm and a rookie PG. It's a playoff team. I really like Boozer's game.
He might be slightly overpaid but he is a 18/11/4 player :man7: He is worth his money more or less, how could you NOT be excited with one of the 10 best PFs on earth.echo nation wrote:lakers cant make the same mistake the knicks make and overpay a player because we supposedly need them
i like boozer, but between his salary and the way he left Cleveland, im not exactly excited

echo nation wrote:because over paying him while tempting, is hardly exciting
k0pr0phage wrote:echo nation wrote:because over paying him while tempting, is hardly exciting
How much do you think is too much for him? Here's a list of some salaries from hoopshype:
Mutombo 18.8M
Allen Houston 17.5
C Webber 17.5
Penny 14.6
Abdur-Rahim 14.6
Grant Hill 14.5
Spree 14.6
Van Horn 14.5
Jalen Rose 14.5
Eddie Jones 13.5
B Grant 13.2
Boozer 10.9
Odom 10.5
I think that everyone on that list is overpaid...but if you look at basketball as a whole, I think that Boozer is getting paid the appropriate amount, relative to the sport. He should be making right about the same amount as Odom, I think. He can play PF a little better, scores a bit more, can rebound about the same, shoots a slightly higher %, but isn't as quick and doesn't have the handles. I'd pay him 10.9 no problem.



echo nation wrote:since when does pointing out other overpaid players to justify over playing a player?
im not knocking his game... just saying we'd be overpaying

KB8 till infinity wrote:echo nation wrote:since when does pointing out other overpaid players to justify over playing a player?
im not knocking his game... just saying we'd be overpaying
If you think any franchise is going to offer us an underrated/underpaid young all-star PF then good luck with that.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
We are in a situation where we have to take contracts that are not the best.Boozer IS worth 8-10 mio.$$$ and I can live with overpaying him 1-2 mio
Return to Trade and Signing Ideas
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests