An Idea for boozer and KG

LUUUKE · by **LUUUKE** on Sun May 21, 2006 12:29 am

just tried this out and look at this..it crazy

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=2748~267~2886~549~617~2027~1703~306~2522~622~70~261&teams=16~26~26~26~16~26~13~16~16~16~26~13

dreamvibes · by **dreamvibes** on Sun May 21, 2006 12:41 am

Call Buss, than say about the trade, u r gonna be the new GM of the Lakers! :jam2:

trips · by **trips** on Sun May 21, 2006 12:53 am

Why would we want Boozer if we got KG?

LakerWraith · by **LakerWraith** on Sun May 21, 2006 12:58 am

hm...very interesting...heh...boozer off the bench would be killer...lol...and i guess depends on matchups with teams...start KG at center and boozer at pf...lol...

KB24 · by **KB24** on Sun May 21, 2006 1:15 am

I take Boozer over KG

why?
He makes half the money means more flexibility
He is a lot younger
We wouldn´t have to give up any significant player in order to sign him.

TaniBoyz · by **TaniBoyz** on Sun May 21, 2006 1:42 am

I'd take Odom over Boozer

Mr. Sampton · by **Mr. Sampton** on Sun May 21, 2006 2:12 am

Why would Utah make that trade? They would be worse off. In addition, the trade would not be possible for the Lakers. They would have to do too much sign and trade. Bad deal.

Klewfish · by **Klewfish** on Sun May 21, 2006 9:55 am

Why would Utah want to get 2 Centers in Mihm/Blount?
Why would Minny want 2 SF's in Odom/Harpring?
Why would the Lakers want two power fowards in KG/Boozer?

Outlaw101 · by **Outlaw101** on Sun May 21, 2006 11:01 am

look at my trade

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/t ... 6~16~13~13

and look at this

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/t ... eams=16~13

and this

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/t ... teams=7~13

low · by **low** on Sun May 21, 2006 1:56 pm

KB8@CL wrote:I take Boozer over KG

why?
He makes half the money means more flexibility
He is a lot younger
We wouldn´t have to give up any significant player in order to sign him.

totally agree.I would love to see kobe and kg together but we wouldn't have flexibility to get a good supporting cast and without one we can't go all the way.

The Laker Link · by **The Laker Link** on Sun May 21, 2006 2:03 pm

LUUUKE wrote:just tried this out and look at this..it crazy

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=2748~267~2886~549~617~2027~1703~306~2522~622~70~261&teams=16~26~26~26~16~26~13~16~16~16~26~13

Not bad...kind of like it...

but...

What about this idea...that plays off of yours and we get Fisher back....and ditch Smush but keep Sasha and some other people???

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=1703~306~2522~622~632~70~261~496~2748~267~2886~372~539~549~617~1823~2027~246&teams=13~16~16~16~9~26~13~9~16~26~26~9~16~26~16~9~26~13

Might be too big of a trade and we might be getting a little screwed in the deal so...but hey...it is an idea....

no_dont · by **no_dont** on Sun May 21, 2006 4:11 pm

Adding Booz and a defensive guard would give us plenty of talent to win rings

strikemode14 · by **strikemode14** on Sun May 21, 2006 4:45 pm

Utah does this becuase of???
Minny does that becuase of??
We do that becuase of???

LUUUKE · by **LUUUKE** on Sun May 21, 2006 4:54 pm

well yea i knew it was a bad trade..i was just testint that thing out

An Idea for boozer and KG

An Idea for boozer and KG

Re: An Idea for boozer and KG

Re: An Idea for boozer and KG

Who is online