LAKERS/KNICKS TRADE NOT MARBURY

why?

We need another PG and Mihm will clearly not be on the team next year. Nate torches the Lakers when he plays us. We have a problem with little PG's. I love Chris he is one of the good really good guys in the NBA, but he is not being used becasue we have Josh Powell. Powell is more athletic.

Nate demands playing time. We need a guy that will do what Yue does, but better than him.

But since he's young, we don't really need another one. Not to mention we've got one or two guys in the DL.

Farmar demands a good chunk of time, Fisher is still a starter. Where does Nate fit in?

NATE IS ACTUALLY A GOOD PLAYER WHY WOULD ANYONE GIVE UP A GOOD PLAYER FOR PLAYER WHO WAS NEVER GOOD AT ANY POINT IN HIS CAREER

Why not try and get Eddy Curry? Get a big to help in the rotation. Take a flyer on him and see how he works out. If you can get him for VladRad, which he fits nicely in the Knicks offense, and gives the Lakers better rotations, I'd say take a flyer and see how it works out.

sho wrote:Why not try and get Eddy Curry? Get a big to help in the rotation. Take a flyer on him and see how he works out. If you can get him for VladRad, which he fits nicely in the Knicks offense, and gives the Lakers better rotations, I'd say take a flyer and see how it works out.

Heeeeeell no.

Think of the millions Jerry Buss would spend on food alone! That is worse than the luxury tax...

^^^hahahha....anyways Nate is succeeding because of the system as well, hes a CHUCKER and what better system to be a CHUCKER then Nelly/Di Antoni.

And the Knicks do this why?

^^^its the Knicks lol...oh wait Isiah not their GM anymore